LHSebi From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 1049 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted
Fri Aug 26 2005 20:52:39 UTC (9 years 5 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3060 times:
No, sorry. That will most certainly get badmotiv here!
I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
Boeingfan71 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 96 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted
Fri Aug 26 2005 22:04:54 UTC (9 years 5 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3018 times:
yep i have to go with LHSebi on this one i got a hooters air 757 at
MCO and it fell victim to badmotive. cheers drake f.
MNeo From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2004, 776 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted
Fri Aug 26 2005 22:11:55 UTC (9 years 5 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3013 times:
Would it matter that it is at a airport that dosent have much pictures in the
DB and will soon be replaced by a new terminal?
Powered by Maina
UA777222 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3348 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted
Fri Aug 26 2005 23:35:40 UTC (9 years 5 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2993 times:
The overall standard is that if anything is blocking the aircraft it will be branded Badmotiv. The meaning behind the picture has little impact on the screening unless it's an incident or one of a kind event.
"It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark."
Scbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 13084 posts, RR: 46
Reply 5, posted
Sat Aug 27 2005 00:46:04 UTC (9 years 5 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2983 times:
If it was an old classic not already in the db, then it would probably get in. Alternatively, if you had a photo of a plane preparing for a flight on which it crashed, then it might be of historical interest and be acceptable.
Unfortunately, a LH A321 doesn't qualify as a classic just yet.
Je Suis Charlie
N907CL From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 255 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted
Sat Aug 27 2005 03:02:44 UTC (9 years 5 months 4 days ago) and read 2962 times:
O please quit saying its badmotive, when photos like this do get in the database. View Large View Medium Photo © Peter Unmuth - VAP
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9674 posts, RR: 67
Reply 7, posted
Sat Aug 27 2005 08:25:42 UTC (9 years 5 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2938 times:
Thats a great shot of that
MD-11. Sad to see it parked up like that.
Edoca From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 688 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted
Sat Aug 27 2005 15:50:18 UTC (9 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2901 times:
When I saw N907CL's post, I though hell was going to break loose again. Luckily, either people were asleep, or smart enough not to start another fight.
That put aside: I would have answered in the same line as the first 5 replies. Now I'm not so sure any more. So: what's the final answer to MNeo's question, if I may ask?
TFSPhoto From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted
Sat Aug 27 2005 15:59:09 UTC (9 years 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2899 times:
Quoting N907CL ( Reply 6): O please quit saying its badmotive, when photos like this do get in the database.
But thats Peter's shot.. anything goes remember?