Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejected - Question?  
User currently offlineWork4bmi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1057 times:

Hello,

First of all, I accept every rejection with understanding and aid to improve. However, the worst rejection for me to possibly get is this one, "badcommon"... The main reason is, my local airport (EMA) has very limited possibilities for areas to shoot from.

I have had the following rejected, which bother me slightly because my upload ratio will go down now due to commonality issue and not a quality issue.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...hoto.main?filename=GBVKD.1.20D.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...hoto.main?filename=GBVKB.1.20D.jpg

To be fare, I appreciate the screeners view to some degree, "oh yes another baby shot he has taken before from this location"... I can see their point, but I get the impression that if "joe bloggs" had uploaded it, it would be accepted because its a different photographer, dispite the same shot?

In other words, its not the photo thats the issue as such, just the fact the same photographer had uploaded an aircraft in a similer view as before on more than one occasion?

Please dont feel am all angry, and bitter towards the screenes - am totally not, its just I'd like to know if anybody else has any views on this? Either way, I'll do my best to improve and hope a.net accept the future photos  Smile

Thanks folks!

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMhodgson From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2002, 5047 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1046 times:

Unless you already have the same type of shot in the database, I think the rejection is a little unfair - the Duty... Free aircraft is hardly in the same colour scheme


No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced
User currently offlineDcrusafon From Spain, joined Apr 2004, 333 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1044 times:

Hello Aaron,

I think that the rejections are totally right and correct.

For the first rejection, you have 10 pic from that registration in EMA and the rejected pic is very similar to these two pics.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Aaron Lupton - WorldAirlineImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Aaron Lupton - WorldAirlineImages



For the second one, I found this pic in database very very similar and it is yours Smile

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Aaron Lupton - WorldAirlineImages



BTW, very nice shoots  Smile

All the best,

DARIO


User currently offlineWork4bmi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1034 times:

Yep, I agree really... Suppose its just hard sometimes to accept it when you spend hours outside, and cant change the vantage point much  Smile

Thanks for liking the pics though...


User currently offlineAIHTOURS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1031 times:

I'm at East Midlands Airport as well, and I understand exactly what Aaron says about the commonality of some Aircraft.

I had G-BYZJ rejected for badcommon. It is disappointing as it's not a rejection I think is in my control as much as the others.

I did get one of G-BVKD on though.

Anyway, goodluck!


User currently offlineCruiser From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1001 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1030 times:

I personally am getting a lot of noa_common lately, and most of the time, there really is not a similar shot in the database (puff of smoke on landing). I think that it is more a case of there are 60 shots of the plane with a blue background in the database, so it is considered to be a common aircraft, and therefore, not wanted in the database. I honestly have a problem with this, but I don't see it changing anytime soon. I think that there is one screener who is using the Noa_Common for any picture they do not want added for any reason.

James



Leahy on Per Seat Costs: "Have you seen the B-2 fly-by at almost US$1bn a copy? It has only 2 seats!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejected For Softness + Question To Screeners posted Wed May 17 2006 09:03:17 by Coninpa
Rejected Photo, Question To Screener posted Wed May 8 2002 01:42:24 by Wietse
LHR Runway Usage Question posted Sun Dec 10 2006 17:51:59 by EMA747
Canon 30D - Early Problems Question posted Sat Dec 9 2006 16:53:40 by Sabena 690
Compact Flash Question posted Sat Dec 9 2006 09:24:13 by FXfan
Motive Question... posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:55:16 by Eadster
Manchester Southside Question posted Wed Dec 6 2006 20:50:50 by Donder10
Rejection/Motiv Question posted Tue Dec 5 2006 23:56:10 by Vzlet
Info Question posted Thu Nov 30 2006 21:34:11 by JohnJ
Waterspraying Rejected .. A Dream. posted Mon Nov 27 2006 21:07:32 by Guido