Flyfisher1976 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 804 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3693 times:
Great shot! However, I can see why this was rejected for badquality. The details on the aircraft appear to be a bit washed out, like the photo was improperly processed for noise reduction (neatimage?). While I understand the motivation behind including the fire truck, it doesn't really adda anything to the shot, and it is rather distracting from the main subject. I think you would have had a better shot with this one if you had waited for the aircraft to start turning left onto the runway, producing a more interesting shot(with the fedex colors visible). From the front this aircraft is really just another white airplane.
Cruiser From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1001 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3647 times:
I am work currently, but I will post the original when I get home. Do you guys think that I should just ditch the shot if I cannot get it accepted with the fire truck in it? That was my whole reason for uploading that picture.
Leahy on Per Seat Costs: "Have you seen the B-2 fly-by at almost US$1bn a copy? It has only 2 seats!"
A few tips.
- Shoot in RAW(you have one of the best cams available so why limit yourself)
- Don't shoot in sRGB(convert from Adobe to sRGB before you upload)
- 1/50s at 200mm without a tripod ? is difficult, your 20D does not produce major noise at iso 200 so why not using it(you paid for it)
The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist