Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection Time: Motive, Quality, Angle  
User currently offlineVasanthd From India, joined May 2005, 450 posts, RR: 9
Posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2245 times:

Hi all,
Help needed...in improving the following pictures...

Rejected for Bad Quality
==================
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...name=champ_n294as_090305_DFW_1.jpg

Rejected for Bad Angle
=================
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ilename=aa_n39365_090305_DFW_1.jpg

Rejected for Bad Quality, Motive
=======================
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ilename=aa_n572aa_090305_DFW_1.jpg

Is the MDs partial sticker a bad motive?

Thanks.
--Vasanth


One Lucky shot deserves another!
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2241 times:

#1 - Not too sure, maybe a little sharp
#2 - Could use some CW rotation
#3 - Motive could be the focus on the pilot or leaving on the 'n' in American.
Hope this helps.
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 972 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

Almost the same as Matt,

1. Oversharp/heat distortion - noise - slight lack of contrast

2. Some CW rotation.

3. Soft - noise - a little CW rotation - happy looking pilot for the motive.

Keep at it - Jid



G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
User currently offlineVasanthd From India, joined May 2005, 450 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2191 times:

Hi Matt and Jid,
I will adjust 1 and 2. BUt regarding the 3rd one, i thgt showing a pilot will not yield to bad motive. I will re-edit the 3rd one by showing the whole American sticker.

Thanks guys.
--Vas



One Lucky shot deserves another!
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2188 times:

1) jaggies on the fuselage
2) angle - look at the tower-loking structure behind the nose and the lampost behind the tail
3) a bit soft, as for motiv - there seems to be nothing special here, or is there ?



How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlineFlyingZacko From Germany, joined May 2005, 583 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2178 times:

Number 2 definitely needs CW rotation judging by the tower on the left. And also I would crop it since it seems bad center to me.

Cheers,
Sebastian



Canon 40D + 24-70 f/2.8 L + 70-200 f/4 L + Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2160 times:

Quoting Jid (Reply 2):
happy looking pilot for the motive.

Are you kidding me?

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 4):
there seems to be nothing special here, or is there

It's a photo of a plane. Guess there's nothing special about that.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2131 times:

SATX,

I totally agree with you. Sometimes I really don't understand the reasons behind some rejections. And I guess we never will.

Vasanthd,

As for the third photo, unless there is something there to show like a dented area, or an interesting sticker etc, pics like that will be rejected.

Hope this helps.


User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 972 posts, RR: 32
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2106 times:

Quoting SATX (Reply 6):
Quoting Jid (Reply 2):
happy looking pilot for the motive.

Are you kidding me?

Nope .. the pilots face is in full view. I did not say I agreed with it but you may find that is your reason for NOA_Motive.

Jid.



G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
User currently offlineVasanthd From India, joined May 2005, 450 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2065 times:

Quoting Jid (Reply 8):
the pilots face is in full view

OK..guys...Bad luck for the pilot...I now reuploaded another picture of the same aircraft...without the "HAPPY LOOKIN GUY"  Smile
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/aa_n572aa_090305_DFW_2.jpg
Is this OK?

I am re-working on the other two...and will post after its done..
Thanks for ur repiles..
--Vasanth



One Lucky shot deserves another!
User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2058 times:

Quoting Jid (Reply 8):
Nope .. the pilots face is in full view. I did not say I agreed with it but you may find that is your reason for NOA_Motive.

What kind of fascist screening process requires smiling faces on people we don't even know? Anyone who wants to see a bunch of giggling morons should go to Disneyland and leave A.net alone.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 972 posts, RR: 32
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2062 times:

Unfortunately its too dark, adjust your levels to lighten it up. It will also stand a very small amount of USM. I do like the crop.

Cheers .. Jid



G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejection For Bad Quality posted Sun Apr 23 2006 12:48:02 by A388
Rejection Post-mortem: Quality And Blurry? posted Sat Feb 18 2006 16:55:01 by D L X
Rejection Time....Halp! posted Wed Nov 2 2005 20:24:57 by Vasanthd
Motive & Angle posted Sat Sep 10 2005 14:56:24 by Cruiser
Feedback On Rejection For Bad Quality posted Thu Mar 31 2005 15:47:20 by Fultod
Rejection Advice - Image Quality? posted Tue Jul 1 2003 10:44:55 by Manzoori
Rejection Help Please: Motive, People & Quality... posted Wed Sep 13 2006 12:38:58 by EDDL
Motive Rejection..clarification Please? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 14:40:46 by BrianW999
Quality Rejection - Your Thoughts Please! posted Mon Nov 27 2006 14:44:59 by ZSOFN
Quality Rejection posted Mon Nov 27 2006 09:55:31 by FYODOR