Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Help With Quality Issues  
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1297 posts, RR: 16
Posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2617 times:

These rejections were all for quality. I took them with a 300D and a 70-200 f/4 L lens. I assume I am messing up the post processing, but I really don't know. If anyone wants to see the originals I can email them to you. Thanks.
-Matt
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/MattW-10-8-05-CC-CBJ.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/MattW-10-8-05-PP-VTJ.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/MattW-10-8-05-VH-OEC.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/MattW-10-8-05-N121UA.jpg


Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2595 times:

I seem to recognize all of those shots.  Big grin

They look pretty darn good to me, but what I think has nothing to do with A.net's formula.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineEdoca From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 688 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2583 times:

Hi Matt,

Not sure if I can diagnose correctly, but I do see a few issues. The LAN is badly compressed as far as I can see, making it soft and blurry.
The other 3 all have some haze or jaggies, look at the tails for example. I am unsure whether this can be corrected by sharpening (USM), or whether it is a heat effect. From the looks of it, it was a warm day with much turbulence right?
How do you sharpen images? Unsharp Mask in progressive steps?

Other than that, great images indeed!


User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2581 times:

Quoting Edoca (Reply 2):
From the looks of it, it was a warm day with much turbulence right?

It was nice and cool with only a light breeze IIRC. Then again, maybe it was different on the tarmac. I have several of the same shots on my computer and they look similar to WT's (350D).



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1297 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2578 times:

Interesting remark about compression. I have never had issues with that before. It might just be heat haze, but I am unsure. I always sharpen in 1 step with USM at 0.3 radius, 0 threshhold, and depending on the photo between 50-150%. I apply USM only to the aircraft and objects, but not the sky. The originals look a lot better than the final image. Here is the original LAN shot.
http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img3467small7se.jpg
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineEdoca From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 688 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2571 times:

Matt, I had another look at the LAN shot you just posted, and the full-size version. In my view that full-size version needs more sharpening (I'm using the approach of several passes of 50%). What I always do is resize them to 1024 or similar size first, and then apply USM sharpening. That might help?

In any case, the original one above and the one on imageshack (not the full version) have jaggies. Since the full-size one doesn't have it, I thought it was due to the compression of the size (so I didn't mean jpeg-compression).


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2570 times:

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 4):
The originals look a lot better than the final image.

?? Then why process them? I'd say your exposures are whacked. The sky is a different color in each one. That should tell you something all by itself.


User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2566 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 6):
Then why process them? I'd say your exposures are whacked

That's a little harsh, but it still had me LOL.

Quoting JeffM (Reply 6):
The sky is a different color in each one. That should tell you something all by itself.

Yeah, it should tell you to upload only one photo at a time.  Big grin



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1297 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2561 times:

Wow, I am so cunfused at the moment. First, Edoca, I always use the same workflow, which I think I got from Fergul of Ireland. It is very simple, and has worked for 125 shots of mine. Second, Jeff, what are you getting at, I am not clear on your remark. If the originals looks ok, than the final should look ok too. The originals look good because they are huge, when resized the quality does not stay the same on my monitor. It might be because I am on such a high resolution monitor. As far as the exposures, it was partly cloudy with some haze, so the lighting changed, plus these shots were taken over about 4 hours. The sky color is not going to be the same as well as the exposure. Please clarify what you are saying.
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineFlyfisher1976 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 804 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2560 times:

Quoting SATX (Reply 7):
Yeah, it should tell you to upload only one photo at a time.

 checkmark 


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 44
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2558 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 6):
sky is a different color in each one. That should tell you something all by itself.

I notice that the sky changes colour when i point the lens in different directions a few degrees up from this horizon is enough to change the colour sometimes .
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help With Quality Rejection posted Fri Sep 29 2006 11:38:26 by UnattendedBag
Help With 'quality ' Rejection Please. posted Sun Sep 24 2006 12:30:39 by Nucky
Some Help With Quality posted Fri Jul 28 2006 17:09:10 by WakeTurbulence
Help With Quality And Crop, Please! posted Sun Jan 15 2006 10:22:23 by Frippe
Please Help With Quality / Size Rejection posted Thu Dec 15 2005 21:37:54 by The
Help With Quality Rejection posted Mon Oct 31 2005 01:43:51 by FUAirliner
Help Needed - Quality Issues posted Wed Aug 31 2005 21:44:20 by 747 4-ever
Need Some Help With Quality posted Sun Apr 4 2004 14:34:51 by A3204eva
Help Needed With Quality Rejection posted Sat May 6 2006 12:43:47 by GBOAB
Quality Issues With This One? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 22:40:34 by MarkJBeckwith