Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM  
User currently offlineTRVYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 6630 times:

This is the refined version of the old 75-300mm IS lens, one of A.net's popular lenses.
FM has shown some good reviews on it. I feel tempted to buy this as I cannot afford the L lens and I would like the "IS" factor. It has an additional IS mode also(compared to its older model). It costs almost the same (slightly less) as 70-200mm F/4L. I would like to know how much would I be missing if I opted this Non "L" "IS" over the F/4L.

I searched A.net database for this lens and found no match. Any body on A.net happen to use it, please describe your experience.

Thanks

SF

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 6588 times:

Hi Santhosh,

I use the 70-300mm DO IS lens if that is the one you're talking about.

If it is, then the results are certainly far better than the other two lenses I use, but not as good as 'L' glass. Very small and compact and generally I have no complaints.

Tim.



Obviously missing something....
User currently offlineTRVYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6566 times:

Quoting DC10Tim (Reply 1):
I use the 70-300mm DO IS lens if that is the one you're talking about.

No, I know the "diffractive optics", that costs double than the one I am talking about.

This is a very new lens http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...?product=294&sort=7&cat=all&page=8

I noticed this one at the Henry's Photographic Exhibition, last Sunday.

Thanks for your reply.

Regards

SF

[Edited 2005-10-19 03:03:51]

User currently offlineF9Widebody From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1604 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 6546 times:

Read Justin Wood's (Jkw777) thread about his new lens. The new 70-300 comes up and the general consensus is spend the slight extra to get the 70-200. L glass makes a HUGE difference compared to the difference between two non L lenses.

Regards



YES URLS in signature!!!
User currently offlineTRVYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 6517 times:

Quoting F9Widebody (Reply 3):
The new 70-300 comes up and the general consensus is spend the slight extra to get the 70-200 L.

In the discussions,the thread was started by DAVIDYYC, although he mentioned about 70-300mm IS, all the replies and sample photos were about 75-300mm IS.


User currently offlineDC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 6480 times:

Wow, I wasn't aware there was a new 70-300mm IS lens. There's nothing on Canon UK's website  Smile It seems like quite an attractive buy.

Tim.



Obviously missing something....
User currently offlineGmonney From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2159 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 6371 times:

Wow, That lense looks pretty good, I will have to wait and see if its any good, I wonder what Henry's will give me for my 75-300 USM III? I am looking to get the 70-200L IS 2.8 but I don't think I want to fork over $2500 plus CDN taxes for it. As well, by the time i get a filter for the damn thing i will be over $3000... I may get all of what I am looking for in this new lense? Any word on the price?


Drive it like you stole it!
User currently offlineTRVYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6340 times:

Quoting Gmonney (Reply 6):
Any word on the price?

Yup, C$799 at Henry's and 30$ rebate at Vistek downtown. http://www.vistek.ca/details/detail_...p?eCode=221914&TYPE=&Specs=N&Box=N


User currently offlineGmonney From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2159 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 6285 times:

Is it worth it? I think guys are happy with the IS on the 75-300? For the same price you can get the 70-200L F4? which is a better lens... obviously the -300mm is longer but for what we use these lenses for, on a more than often basis, is it worth losing -100mm to gain one stop?

Grant



Drive it like you stole it!
User currently offlineLewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3592 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 14 hours ago) and read 6267 times:

This lens was recently released along with the 24-105mm L. First samples look very promising. All 75-300mm Canon lenses were a bit soft at the tele end but many people that have used this lens say that its better than the previous model for image quality and better IS.

User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (8 years 6 months 12 hours ago) and read 6253 times:

I wonder if it really is better at 300mm, or whether the improved IS just makes it seem that way.


James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineTRVYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1369 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 months 9 hours ago) and read 6257 times:

Quoting Gmonney (Reply 8):
Is it worth it?

That's the real question. The diference between this and its oder model is
1) It's got a UD lens element
2) Second IS mode for Panning.
3) Circular Aperture (I don't know if the other one was different, this I am writing from the Canon Catalog I got)
4) 70mm instaed of 75mm at the lower end.

Advantage over F/4 L is

1) IS allowing shot without blur at 1/60secs at 300mm and also panning.

Ofcourse Quality is not to be "L" level, but wait to see some actual pics from Anetters.

The question is whether Picture and quality is closer to 75-300mm IS(old model) or the 70-200F/4L.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM Review Wanted posted Thu Apr 6 2006 12:01:46 by Deaphen
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Wed Mar 16 2005 01:57:38 by APFPilot1985
Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 Is USM posted Tue Jul 9 2002 14:59:50 by Granite
Canon EF-S 17-85mm 1:4-5.6 Is USM posted Mon Jul 17 2006 13:41:22 by FlyingZacko
The Canon EF 70-200mm F/4L USM posted Mon Jul 3 2006 03:35:04 by Aero145
The Canon EF 70-200mm 1:4L USM posted Mon Apr 17 2006 00:57:27 by Flyingzacko
Comments On The Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 III Usm? posted Thu Jul 25 2002 17:19:00 by OH-LZA
Canon EF 28-300mm F/3.5-5.6L Is USM posted Thu Aug 24 2006 00:51:24 by Brick
New Canon 70-300mm Is With Do Elements posted Sun Feb 1 2004 07:21:31 by Hkg_clk
For Sale: Canon 70-300mm Is + 350D + Grip posted Thu Jul 27 2006 21:44:00 by Manc