Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection Help...  
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 13
Posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 1468 times:

Hey guys, had a couple overview/terminal rejections from GRB recently. The first one was this:


It got badinfo, was that because there is a Northwest DC9 in the shot and I failed to include that in the airline/aircraft info?

Second is this one, this one for badmotiv which had me shaking my head:


Are terminal views no longer being accepted? I have an ORD terminal shot from last year with tons of people in it. Was this one just not interesting enough? It is a very nice terminal that the city of Green Bay should be proud of.

Here is the ORD shot I was talking about:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Danny Fritsche - Airplanespotters


Bring back Bethune!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBmiBaby737 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1975 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1449 times:


I'm not expert for sure! But I agree with the rejection of Motive for your shot, purely because I don't see a point behind the photo, with the photo you have already got accepted there is something to look at, with the one you recently got rejected, it's just an empty part of the building,

Some A.netters will be able to help with that more I'm sure,


User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1387 times:

I don't see why that would be. I think the motive is clear, as its in the comment. Which you can't see. I was showing the new concourse at GRB. I would point out quite a few empty terminal shots but we know how that goes. Any suggestions as to whether or not I should have included the reg. of the NWA DC9 in the 1st shot?


Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1331 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

Ya, the info could be from that. I don't know what you included for the airport field, but I assume that is correct. As far as motive, I personally think the first is ok. I have seen shots like this and they have been accepted. But the pic is blurry at the bottom of the frame, see the taxiway lighting. I don't know if boring = motive, but that is what the 2nd shot is saying. It could also be the fat red exit sign at the top. Who knows, motvie is sometimes a hard one to pin down. I like the accepted shot, it shows the life of an airport. The rejected shot definitely has that lacking.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Info Rejection Help Please posted Mon Nov 27 2006 18:00:22 by Kukkudrill
Puzzling Rejection - Help Needed posted Sat Nov 18 2006 19:40:59 by Chukcha
Rejection Help posted Thu Nov 2 2006 21:19:55 by Nbseer
Rejection Help - Info And Category posted Thu Nov 2 2006 11:16:26 by UA935
Quality Rejection Help Requested posted Mon Oct 30 2006 00:52:36 by Ptrjong
Soft Rejection Help posted Fri Oct 27 2006 22:54:51 by D L X
Rejection Help: Colour & Dark posted Fri Oct 27 2006 03:35:17 by TransIsland
Motion Blur Rejection - Help Please! posted Wed Oct 18 2006 00:44:13 by QantasA332
Rejection Help posted Sun Oct 8 2006 15:23:26 by TransIsland
Motiv Rejection Help posted Wed Sep 27 2006 12:00:48 by Raptors