Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Motive Question  
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2801 times:

Got this rejected.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ions/big/B742_PH-BUK_CRW_b3326.jpg

Quality isn't great which is the result of a dull day and the rejection itself did not surprise me until I received the email.
These photo(s) show a motive that is not accepted by Airliners.net....
I don't want to argue the rejection as I don't care about it but just looking for some info to prevent future mistakes.

t.i.a.
Willem


The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2791 times:

Quoting Aviopic (Thread starter):
I don't want to argue the rejection as I don't care about it

Then why start a thread about it?  Big grin  Wink


User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3987 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2784 times:

Well, because he's

Quoting Aviopic (Thread starter):
just looking for some info to prevent future mistakes.

I think this is an obvious case of:


DOH !


User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2742 times:

Quoting 9VSPO (Reply 1):
Then why start a thread about it?

Because I would like to learn what's wrong with this motive.
Some time soon this engine will be put back in place and of course I will be around to shoot it.
Also I would like to upload one or two if I know what engine motive is acceptable otherwise I am wasting everybody's precious time including my own.

Quoting AirKas1 (Reply 2):
I think this is an obvious case of:

UUhh Kas.... what is so obvious of DOH ?
Guess I am getting old and forgetting all the short cuts Big grin


Willem



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3987 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2733 times:

Quoting Aviopic (Reply 3):
Guess I am getting old and forgetting all the short cuts

Homer Simpson-wise: DOH  Big grin


User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2733 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Willem

We don't accept these unmounted engines. Try your luck after you attach it Wink

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 6, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2731 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Actually Kas, that would be D'OH Smile

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2730 times:

Ok, sorry Aviopic. Just trying to add some humour and failed.

My first thoughts when I look at the pic are that I think it is poorly cropped (framed), secondly, the sky is too 'white' and thirdly there are obvious signs of grain around the engine.

Just my opinion. I do love the shot, but I just don't think the quality is there.


User currently offlineAirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3987 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2704 times:

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 6):
Actually Kas, that would be D'OH

Ah damn.... You must be a bigger fan than I am? Big grin


(my defense: I was in a hurry  Silly )


User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 9, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2702 times:

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 5):
We don't accept these unmounted engines. Try your luck after you attach it

Ok, thanks Tim.
That's all I wanted to hear.

Quoting AirKas1 (Reply 4):
Homer Simpson-wise: DOH



Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 6):
Actually Kas, that would be D'OH

Sorry guys, no time for the tele.
Never mind though.


Willem



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 10, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2697 times:

A tech section on Anet wouldn't hurt anyone and would open the gates to great shots as this one here by Kas.
Anet why not spread your wings to bluer skies.?

Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 11, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2683 times:

A tech section on Anet wouldn't hurt anyone and would open the gates to great shots as this one here by Wiliam
Anet why not spread your wings to bluer skies.?

Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2668 times:

Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 11):
A tech section on Anet wouldn't hurt anyone and would open the gates to great shots

MyAviation.net takes those shots. Personally I don't want to start seeing pictures of airplane parts unassembled. Where would you draw the line on what is and isn't acceptable?

"Here is a screw from the upper anti-collision light" or "this is the nut behind the stick...." Oops, we already have pilot pictures on here. Well, you get the drift.........


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 13, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2650 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 12):
MyAviation.net takes those shots. Personally I don't want to start seeing pictures of airplane parts unassembled. Where would you draw the line on what is and isn't acceptable?

The line can be drawn at the same allocations as we already do for any other shot in the DB motive has to be clear and precise.
Maybe a lot wont mind it maybe a lot will.
Just an opinion for the future if this site decides it wants to inject new material into the Db.
Sooner or later people will cry out for something fresh to see what better example can we suggest then a tech or artistic category .
Sorry about the double post above .
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 14, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2549 times:

Hmm I still like those "unmounted" engines Big grin


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Balint Bartfai
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Petr Popelar



Have fun,
Willem



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineAJO From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 575 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2548 times:

Quoting JeffM (Reply 12):
"this is the nut behind the stick...." Oops, we already have pilot pictures on here.

LOL!!!  rotfl 



Ryanair: never again!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Motive Question - Ramp Shot posted Fri Jun 2 2006 09:32:00 by ZSOFN
Motive Question.. Smoke posted Thu Mar 30 2006 04:54:26 by StealthZ
Another Motive Question... posted Tue Feb 21 2006 01:27:03 by CanadianNorth
Motive Question For Cockpit Shots posted Tue Feb 14 2006 23:08:30 by ElpinDAB
First Night Shot And Motive Question posted Wed Feb 1 2006 19:32:59 by Phxplanes
Motive Question posted Thu Nov 3 2005 20:46:50 by Aviopic
Motive Question (Inc Photo).. posted Thu Oct 20 2005 18:50:28 by TFSPhoto
A Question About Doubles And Motive posted Sun Oct 15 2006 14:49:31 by Psych
Motive And Sharpening Question posted Fri Sep 15 2006 06:13:29 by MarkJBeckwith
Question Of Motive posted Sat Dec 3 2005 06:14:51 by AdamWright