Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Long Exposures  
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1297 posts, RR: 16
Posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1681 times:

Can a screener/photog tell me where Anet stands on these types of shots? I had recently seen these two added,

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dna
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Juha-Matti Vähälummukka

which are both great shots, and I would like to see more of the long exposures on Anet. After seeing these I uploaded the shots below and had them rejected for motive. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/MattW-11-3-05-BA744.jpg
and this was rejected on appeal as well...
http://img434.imageshack.us/my.php?image=mattw11305emb120moon9rp.jpg
How does Anet feel about these types of photos because I am confused at the moment. Is it the 'overall motive' or a specific part of the frame that should not be in there? Thanks for any help.
-Matt


Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1297 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1597 times:

I was also waiting to see if this photo got in, it is similar to the shots I am talking about. I am glad to see it got in, personally I thought for sure it would be rejected for motive.
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Samples - CFI-CFII-MEI

Anyone have thoughts on any of these pics and Anet's stance on them? Thanks
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1591 times:

A quick search would reveal there are many of these types of photos in the database. Based on that I would say they are ok.

[Edited 2005-11-14 17:11:09]

User currently offlineAtomother From United States of America, joined May 1999, 440 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

My shot did get rejected, I appealed it and 5 min later it was in. I have one more in the queue that is apparently waiting for Johan. Hopefully it goes too.

Here is the one still waiting, wish it luck.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/196_9685.JPG


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help Please With Long Exposures On Digital Camera! posted Sat Jan 17 2004 01:56:41 by MartinairYYZ
Long Exposures During Night Shots. posted Fri Jan 26 2001 06:23:26 by BO__einG
Ultra High Exposures posted Fri Dec 1 2006 16:44:25 by LIPH
LON-MAD - A Stop In ZRH - Long Enough To Shoot? posted Sun Oct 1 2006 15:00:44 by Glennstewart
EOS350D Long Loading Time Via USB posted Mon Aug 21 2006 15:32:50 by GeorgL
How Long Does The Appeal Process Take posted Wed Jul 19 2006 14:00:51 by Parsival
How Long Does Priority Screening Take? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 12:55:16 by LHRSIMON
Spotting In Long Beach Klgb posted Fri Jul 7 2006 18:08:37 by Glapira
Long Exposure Any Chance? posted Sun Jun 25 2006 09:53:26 by JumboJim747
Flying W/ Long Lenses. Any Security Hassles? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 03:02:16 by Eksath