Glennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2542 times:
At work with a crappy LCD screen instead of my screening beast at home... but I concur with Gary...
* Centre: The centre should be around the aircraft as a whole. A lot of people make the mistake of centering the fuselage, but depending upon angle the shot is taken and the type, this can cause the whole shot to be un-centered. In the case of this shot, you probably want to bring the aircraft down just a little...
* Sharpness: Should be pin-sharp without going to the point of creating jaggies. This is especially true for Digital SLR's, which often require slightly more sharpening that non DSLR's by default (later model DSLR's are more often being configured with slightly higher internal sharpening settings - e.g. 10D vs 20D)
Everything else looks fine... especially the colour.
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3070 posts, RR: 57
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2464 times:
For me the key here is still the centering. I am in full agreement with Glenn that the whole aircraft should be centered for it to look right. In this case that means that there will be roughly the same amount of space above the top of the tail as there will be below the nosewheel. At present - even in the new version - there is still a lot of 'dead' taxiway beneath the plane that is not balanced by sky above the tail.
In your position I would be anxious about a rejection for this here.