Q330 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1460 posts, RR: 21
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1315 times:
Nice shot. The nose gear reminds me of a certain JetBlue A320.
I think your second crop is a bit better, but it still may not work. It's probably one of those things that will come down to the individual screener. It would probably be better if you could crop wider, but it sounds like the first version was uncropped.
The safe option would be to crop close in to the nose, but then you'd lose the nice effect under the starboard engine.
Gary2880 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1310 times:
Quoting Rotate (Reply 5): additional: I would try to show the whole fuselage (also on top) try to crop a bit more on the downside ....
PS: the 1st would be awesome, if cropped correctly.
yea i just checked the original and the one on my Pbase is the dimensions that came out of the camera
i could maybe take a bit more off the top to get rid of the horizontal tail but i think my aspect ratio would go off whack. I think the 2nd option is as much as im happy with taking off the left and right of frame keeping what i wanted in the first place. i liked the framing with the logo and the light on the left wing
P.S. it looks like the spell checker has just gone belly up again so im sorry if that was painful to read.