Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon 28-300mm Lens  
User currently offlineBrettdespain From United States of America, joined May 2005, 178 posts, RR: 11
Posted (8 years 8 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4109 times:

Hi all,

Does anyone have any experience with and/or own a Canon 28-300 IS L lens? I've been looking at this lens and also the canon 100-400mm IS lens as well.

Any pro's and con's that I should be aware of? Perhaps you wouldn't mind sharing where you bought your lens and the purchase price? Your comments are appreciated.

- Brett


V1...Rotate.
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRG828 From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4028 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Brett,
I have a 100-400 and just ordered a 28-300, which I should receive in January  hissyfit .

I can't tell you how it behaves - yet - but from the research I did (plenty!) it seems to be a marked improvement over the 100-400 in terms of zoom action (push-pull, you get used to it) and most importantly for me, the IS.

There are a couple of photogs here who use it, it would be nice to know first-hand about its performance.



I dont know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everyone
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4027 times:

Quoting RG828 (Reply 1):
it seems to be a marked improvement over the 100-400 in terms of zoom action

?? What's wrong with the 100-400's "zoom action"? You can't get much easier then a one touch push pull.


User currently offlineRG828 From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4024 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting JeffM (Reply 2):
?? What's wrong with the 100-400's "zoom action"? You can't get much easier then a one touch push pull.

Nothing wrong with it, but apparently the 28-300 is a lot smoother! Hell, I once tried a Vivitar 100-400 that was plenty smoother than my 100-400.



I dont know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everyone
User currently offlineDC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4016 times:

Hi Brett,

I use a 70-300mm DO IS lens, that has had mixed reviews. For me it does the job, but if I were to go out and spend the money again, I might be tempted to pay a few hundreds pounds more and get the 100-400 L IS.

Other than not wanting to spend that much, the main criticisms I have of the 100-400 is that a lot of the time I am close to aircraft and have difficulty fitting them in the frame at 70mm, let alone 100mm. The other thing is, if you're shooting through a mesh perimeter fence, the diameter of the lens is such that you get a dark line running across some part of the shot.

Regards,

Tim.



Obviously missing something....
User currently offlineBrettdespain From United States of America, joined May 2005, 178 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4003 times:

Thanks everyone for your comments. Very informational.

I do most of my shooting from within an airplane so I'm a little leary of swinging around a large lens in a small space. My other concern is that I'm limited on the amount of camera gear I can take with me. Because of that, I'm looking to pack a single lens with a good range that will give me normal to telephoto ranges with the Canon 10D. My first impression is that the 28-300mm IS L would fit the bill, but would empty my bank of other bills  Wink

I'm open to more suggestions, if you have any.

Thanks,

Brett



V1...Rotate.
User currently offlineJavibi From Spain, joined Oct 2004, 1371 posts, RR: 42
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3977 times:

Try contacting Bailey through one of his pics, he owns one of those.

j



"Be prepared to engage in constructive debate". Are YOU prepared?
User currently offlineJid From Barbados, joined Dec 2004, 972 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3965 times:

You can always look for a 35-350mm 'L', they are not made anymore and don't have IS. I would never be without mine and you do still see them on the secondhand market.

Jid



G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
User currently offlineMinoeke From Belgium, joined Jan 2005, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3964 times:

Hi Brett,
If you want to see some pictures, just search under my name (wim callaert - Brussels aviation photography). All pictures taken since august 29th 2004 are with the 28-300L lens. I can assure you that it's a great lens.
Greetings,
Wim


User currently offlineJhribar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3941 times:

Hi Brett,

I'm the happy owner of a 28-300 L and I must say it's a real "allrounder".
Just browse through the database to see some results.
Most of my shots from the past year I took with this lens (I added a comment about the lens most of the time).

The main advantage of this lens is the great flexibility you get.
Shooting 300mm approach shots on one runway and 28 mm side-ons only seconds later on the taxiway without changing lenses!
Cloning dust particles away is history with this lens  Smile

some pro's:
1.) great zoom range
2.) good optical performance
3.) no lens changing needed
4.) it's an "L"  Smile

Of course there are some cons as well:
1.) its price
2.) you have to stop down a little more at 28mm to get best performance...from f/7.1 will do.

Nevertheless if you have $2500 to spend and you need a versatile lens, this is probably the lens you want to buy.


User currently offlineBrettdespain From United States of America, joined May 2005, 178 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3909 times:

Wow, thanks very much to all who have replied to this thread!

It looks to me based on all of your responses that I can't go wrong with either the 100-400mm or the 28-300mm.

RG828:
I hope your lens gets to you soon. Let me know what you think when you get it.

Jid:
I called my local camera stores and no one has a used 35-350mmL. I'll continue to look and thanks for the tip.

Javibi:
Thanks for the tip. I'll send him a note.

Minoeke & Jhribar:
Thank you both for your input. I think I'm leaning more towards the 28-300mm lens. It looks like you're both getting great results.


BTW everyone, I checked out your photos - great work!  Smile

Regards,

Brett



V1...Rotate.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Using A Teleconverter With The Canon 75-300mm Lens posted Sun Feb 24 2002 11:36:28 by Hkg_clk
Canon EF 28-300mm F/3.5-5.6L Is USM posted Thu Aug 24 2006 00:51:24 by Brick
Anyone Use Sigma 28-300mm With Their Canon? posted Fri Aug 12 2005 20:33:59 by Simon Cooper
Sigma Lens 28-300mm Or Nikkor 70-300mm? posted Sun Jul 31 2005 19:54:43 by Airline7322
Lens Trouble! Canon 28-135, 28-105, Tamron 28-105 posted Mon Dec 27 2004 09:34:43 by Lhrsunriser
Opinions On The Canon 28-300 L Is Lens posted Fri Jun 25 2004 11:46:36 by Paulianer
Cosina 28-300mm F/4-6.3 (canon Fit)? posted Mon Jun 23 2003 20:23:33 by EGGD
Canon - 75-300mm F/4.0-5.6 II/III USM EF Lens posted Sat Nov 23 2002 21:57:44 by Airplanetire
Whats A Good 75-300MM Lens Under $250 For A Canon? posted Sun Jan 7 2001 00:45:41 by BA
For Sale: Canon 70-300mm Is + 350D + Grip posted Thu Jul 27 2006 21:44:00 by Manc