Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aww Common, Rejection  
User currently offlineAitek From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 60 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1943 times:

i know this isnt THE sharpest pic ever but id say its pretty good, got rejected for sharpness, you guys think so or what?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...in?filename=102305-b2-af821068.jpg

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

Quoting Aitek (Thread starter):
got rejected for sharpness

You mean it got rejected for jagged or for soft?



-
User currently offlineGary2880 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1914 times:

Quoting Aitek (Thread starter):
id say its pretty good

no questioning that! great shot

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 1):
You mean it got rejected for jagged or for soft?

if you can't tell should he appeal?  Wink


User currently offlineJay767 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 223 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1908 times:

I thinks it worthy of the database, just my  twocents 


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1895 times:

Quoting Gary2880 (Reply 2):
if you can't tell should he appeal?

No but it would be fine if there was the exact reason stated, as we don't have NOA_sharpness  Wink



-
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

I think it's a fantastic shot! But it looks very grainy around the back end.  Smile

I just wish I could get a shot like that!


User currently offlineBrettdespain From United States of America, joined May 2005, 178 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1852 times:

Wow, nice shot!
I personally didn't see any jagged edges. Maybe try sharpening just the plane so the detail lines show a bit more? You definitely have to keep trying on this one.  Smile



V1...Rotate.
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1815 times:

Quoting Aitek (Thread starter):
i know this isnt THE sharpest pic ever

It's soft, and overexposed. No reason for an 'exception'. Fix it, or appeal it. If you like it that much, i'd say fix it and re-upload it. It is way to soft for an appeal.


User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5578 posts, RR: 63
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1792 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Chris

Nice image but needs some sharpening. Looks a little soft.

NOA stands for NOt Airliners.net material. The NOA will be changed very soon......watch your rejection messages!

Regards

Gary


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1736 times:

Quoting Granite (Reply 8):
The NOA will be changed very soon

How soon?? The last rejection I received did not have NOA on it!


User currently offlineAitek From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1707 times:

heres what my email said:

"These photo(s) have a "soft" appearance. This does not mean they are
blurry or out of focus, but that they need an extra kick of sharpness."

and i said it got denied for sharpness meaning that it wasnt sharp enough, sorry bad communication there. ill sharpen it some more and hopefully itll make it through this time, as for it being over exposed id disagree with you there, its a little on the high side but not over.


User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1196 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1701 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting Eadster (Reply 9):
How soon??

Hi Martin,

Just like what Aitek said, I think it's probably the rejection reasons have been changed to be without 'NOA', because I just checked the reasons for all shots in my 'Rejected Photos' page, and found all reasons had no NOA any longer. If a shot has two or more reasons, there might be a space in between. E.g., one of my shot was given "Reject reason: personal angle".

I do not know if this is the final stage as Gary meant. However, at least this is what I observed!

_Hongyin_  wave 


User currently offlineAitek From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

this photo look oversharpened now? its in the queue, should i just pull this?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/102305-b2-af821068.jpg


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1564 times:

I would, you filled the sky with grain. Why did you sharpen the whole picture, when just parts of the plane needed it?

User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1485 times:

I'm surprised it didn't get rejected "Bad Jaggy" - isn't it SUPPOSED to look like that!?  bigthumbsup 

Use USM - not sharpening. If the sky begins to get too spotty, you can brush it out with a soften brush, or just go over the aircraft with a very mild sharpening brush.

Drew



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bad Quality/common Rejection, Need Help posted Fri May 12 2006 00:23:05 by A388
Puzzled About "Double" Rejection posted Tue Dec 12 2006 07:00:40 by Walter2222
"Dark" Rejection - What To Do? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 02:07:33 by Walter2222
Help With A Level Rejection posted Thu Dec 7 2006 22:35:45 by Lnglive1011yyz
Some Rejection Input, Please posted Wed Dec 6 2006 04:12:14 by Futterman
Rejection/Motiv Question posted Tue Dec 5 2006 23:56:10 by Vzlet
Looking For Help Concerning 'soft' Rejection posted Tue Dec 5 2006 19:23:01 by Maiznblu_757
Centring Rejection Feedback posted Tue Dec 5 2006 00:35:20 by Aussie18
Blurry Rejection Help Please posted Mon Dec 4 2006 18:19:13 by Kukkudrill
"Double" Rejection posted Sun Dec 3 2006 23:47:14 by Ander