Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Getting A New Lens For Christmas... Dilema  
User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2032 posts, RR: 10
Posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3895 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey everyone,

This year for Christmas my parents have offered to get me a new lens (basically they've given me a price of $1200 +/- $150 to purchase a new lens.

I've been looking at several options and am curious to hear what other people thinking for my Digital Rebel, really my only uses are for aviation photography, although every once in a while I'll use it for something else.

A) A 70-200 f/2.8 (Non-IS): http://www.normancamera.com/shop/SearchResults.asp?ProdStock=2569a004

B) A 70-200 f/4.0: http://www.normancamera.com/shop/SearchResults.asp?ProdStock=2578a002

and

17-40L: http://www.normancamera.com/shop/SearchResults.asp?ProdStock=canon1740

or

28-135 IS: http://www.normancamera.com/shop/SearchResults.asp?ProdStock=2562a002

or other accessories

C) Or any other combination from that retailer (my parents told me they'd like to get the equipment there, then if there is any problems I can take it back to them, and they are local (my mom owns a local business and prefers doing business locally))

I currently have a Digital Rebel, Battey Grip, 2 Batteries, 18-55 Kit Lens, 75-300 IS, 100-300 and several compact flash cards. (All Canon Lenses)

Also, I would consider other brands provided they would have the same quality or better as the Canon glass.

Thanks for your help everyone!

-Charlie  wave 

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3883 times:

Charles
If you want a good lens all round you cant go past the 70-200 L IS version the one you posted is the non IS but still up there with the quality.
I would defiantly go with this choice.
The f4 is a lot cheaper and is just as good but lacks in low light conditions.
The 28-135 i have no experience with but i personally wouldn't choose this lens as its not L glass and if you are going to spend the money spend it on the L series .
But that's if 200mm is good enough for you im thinking of going that way soon.
The 100-400 mm L IS is Olso a great lens and one that im suing at the moment if you want to conceder that option for around the same price as the IS version of the 70-200mm.
Anyway good luck with your choice and all the best.
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2032 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3865 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for the input Jim, my only problem is that the 702-- f/2.8 IS is out of my price range by about $500. I completely forgot the 100-400, but if I can come up with the extra $200, then I'll probably go that route.

-Charlie


User currently offlineF9Widebody From United States of America, joined exactly 11 years ago today! , 1604 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3810 times:

Get the 100-400. They are around $1350 on buydig.com, which is a reputable Canon dealer (the rebate will work).

Regards



YES URLS in signature!!!
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3794 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes go for a 100-400 unless you spend a lot of time on the ramp in which case I'd go for a 17-40 + 70-200.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3783 times:

What about a 300/4 IS?

Staffan


User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3726 times:

I would go for the 70-200 F4, and the 17-40. That would give you quite a bit of flexibility! (He DOES spend a lot of time on the ramp!!!)  bigthumbsup 

Drew



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3697 times:

Charlie,

There are two lenses I recommend to you. In terms of flexiblity, I would go for the 100-400mm. You cannot beat it.    It has its downfalls (slightly soft at 400mm, push pull which I dont see as a minus, but some do) but the good outweighs the bad, and I think it's highly recommended by most of the photographers on this board.

Another lens I would suggest you look at is the Canon 28-105mm F/3.5.4.5 USM II. Dont confuse it with the 4.5-5.6 version. This one is built much better and is quite sharp.

Now, I do own the 70-200mm F/4 L and its a doozy. I will use that over the 100-400mm when I don't need 201-400mm. Does you're shooting require the added mm? If it does, and you also want an affordable short lens, the 100-400mm and the 28-105mm (mk2) are excellent options to consider.

Good luck with you're decision.

Edit: There is a $50 rebate on the 100-400mm.

[Edited 2005-12-13 10:35:41]

User currently offlineSyncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2032 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3687 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Maiznblu_757 (Reply 7):
Another lens I would suggest you look at is the Canon 28-105mm F/3.5.4.5 USM II

Do you have any shots online anywhere that were taken with this lens?

Quoting Maiznblu_757 (Reply 7):
Does you're shooting require the added mm?

A year ago I would have said yes. But not really much any more.

Do any of your have any experience with the 17-40L?

Thanks for everyones input, its greatly appreciated.

-Charlie


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3683 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chad Thomas - Jetwash Images
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chad Thomas - Jetwash Images



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chad Thomas - Jetwash Images
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chad Thomas - Jetwash Images



And others...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Islam Chen
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kenneth Olsen



User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3681 times:

Quoting Syncmaster (Thread starter):
I currently have a Digital Rebel, Battey Grip, 2 Batteries, 18-55 Kit Lens, 75-300 IS, 100-300

If you get the 100-400mm, you can sell the 75-300mm and the 100-300mm and put it toward a 70-200mm F/4 L.

You would have the 18-55mm,28-105mm (if you decide on that), 70-200mm F/4 L, and the 100-400mm L IS...


Chad

[Edited 2005-12-13 11:46:10]

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3663 times:

give me such parents... Mine have capped presents at €100 for the last decade or more (after upping them from about half that to account for inflation).


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineScottieprecord From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1363 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3552 times:

I got about the same amount for purchasing a lens this year as well. I've pretty much decided on the 100-400 (201-400 is usually needed at KSAT). I already own the 70-200 f/4L and 17-40 f/4L. Both of these lenses are pretty sharp and I highly recommend them. You get a lot for your money.

Here are two taken with the 70-200:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike Paschal
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike Paschal



P.S. JumboJim originally recommended the 17-40 to me last summer. So thanks Jim! Def a good buy.

EDIT: I neglected to mention that I've had problems with the 70-200 f/4L in low-light conditions... but I still recommend it.

-Mike

[Edited 2005-12-27 07:24:58]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Getting Any New Photo Toys For Christmas? posted Mon Dec 22 2003 22:07:53 by JFKTOWERFAN
Looking For A New Lens..28-300.. Or What? posted Wed Jun 8 2005 23:01:37 by GRZ-AIR
500usd Lens For My New D30? Ancient Or New? posted Mon Feb 23 2004 12:59:00 by Vaman
Getting A New Canon EF Lens posted Sat Jan 3 2004 00:43:21 by Apuneger
Rejects With New Lens posted Sun Nov 5 2006 18:43:13 by Manc
Thinking About A New Lens. posted Fri Oct 27 2006 07:52:50 by Avsfan
Camera And Lens For A Novice Photographer... posted Sun Sep 17 2006 22:11:06 by Longhornmaniac
Results With New Lens posted Sat Sep 2 2006 23:31:06 by Psyops
Help Processing With A New Lens! posted Sun Jul 16 2006 11:48:38 by Dazbo5
Few Shots - New Location For Me posted Thu Apr 20 2006 14:54:04 by Soudave