Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Quality Rejection  
User currently offlineA346Dude From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 7
Posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1552 times:

Hey,

I am kind of disappointed about this most recent rejection:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20051224_C-GNON2_121705_Wywrot2.JPG

What do you think, is there any chance for improvement or is it another one for the personal collection?

Thanks for your input,

Dustin


You know the gear is up and locked when it takes full throttle to taxi to the terminal.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyfisher1976 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 804 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 1494 times:

I'd be disappointed too...awesome shot! Can't see any quality issues here.

User currently offline113312 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 574 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1404 times:

I like this kind of inflight window view shot. I especially appreciate a slow enough shutter to give motion to the propeller. Having shot my whole life with conventional film, I see a small depth of field issue. THe ground is sharply in focus yet the small decals on the engine nacelle are not. Digital cameras usually have better depth of field and get results with both near and far being sharp. However, I would love to see this shot in the database as is:Great.

User currently offlineA346Dude From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 1350 times:

Thanks for the input and compliments. I think I will give it one more edit and hope for the best!


You know the gear is up and locked when it takes full throttle to taxi to the terminal.
User currently offlineRunway27Right From United States of America, joined May 2004, 131 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

You're dealing with a group of anal retentive screeners there in my opinion.

There is NO quality issues. Awesome shot!



Keeping PHL Spotting Alive Daily!
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1277 times:



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AF 772 - Quality Rejection posted Sat Jan 13 2007 13:39:47 by Flyingaway
Quality Rejection Questions? posted Mon Jan 8 2007 22:26:25 by LOCsta
Quality Rejection posted Sun Dec 31 2006 19:17:19 by Paulinbna
Quality Rejection Advice Requested posted Sat Dec 23 2006 11:30:05 by Walter2222
Incorrect Missing Info? & Quality Rejection Help. posted Mon Dec 11 2006 20:24:25 by Pride
Quality Rejection - Your Thoughts Please! posted Mon Nov 27 2006 14:44:59 by ZSOFN
Quality Rejection posted Mon Nov 27 2006 09:55:31 by FYODOR
Quality Rejection Help Requested posted Mon Oct 30 2006 00:52:36 by Ptrjong
Quality Rejection Advice posted Sun Oct 22 2006 19:34:08 by Linco22
Quality Rejection: Not Level? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 23:32:17 by KBFIspotter