Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Scanning Films On Flatbed Scanner  
User currently offlineAriis From Poland, joined Sep 2004, 441 posts, RR: 2
Posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3182 times:

Hi there,

I want to hear your opinions on scanning negative/positive films on flatbed scanners (with such features). Do any of you do this? What results do you get? What scanner models would you recommend for this purpose?

In particular, do you have any experience with these: EPSON Perfection 3590 Photo, HP ScanJet 4890, Canon CS4200F?

Yes, I know there are 35mm film scanners that do the job much better, but they are much more expensive (I say too expensive), on the other hand apparently flatbed scanners have quite high optical resolutions nowadays. And I would like to do occasionally some regular sheet scanning as well.

Thank you in advance

FAO - Flight Activities Officer
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineNorfolkjohn From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 251 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3164 times:


I would not recommend scanning of 35mm film as a way of producing present day digital images but it works quite well for old pictures taken in the pre-digital days. The results are certainly nothing like as good as you get from a present day digital camera but for old slides / negatives acceptance on A.Net is usually achievable provided the original film shot was in focus and reasonably well exposed.

I have been using an EPSON Perfection 3200 flat-bed scanner which has a max optical resolution of 3200 ppi. This has given perfectly acceptable results when scanning 35mm negatives at a resolution of 2900 ppi. Using 2900 gives a slightly faster scan and also seems to pick up a bit less grain in some cases.

After scanning I crop, correct exposure, remove any color cast, sharpen, repair (scratches and dust marks) and resize to 1024 wide using PS elements. If the shot is particularly grainy I will run it through Neat Image to reduce the grain but the result sometimes looks rather unnatural.

This link will let you see a scan from a 35mm neg which was originally shot on a horrible wet day back in 1988 which I processed as described above.


The EPSON 3590 should be better than the old 3200 I am using so I would expect you would be able to get fairly good results from it.

Hope this is of some help.


One thorn of experience is worth a whole wilderness of warning.
User currently offlineAriis From Poland, joined Sep 2004, 441 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3142 times:

Quoting Norfolkjohn (Reply 1):

Hey, that is not a bad photo at all!  Smile

Of course, as you say, it will definitely be difficult to get close to recent digital cameras' quality, but still, the photo above shows that you really can get decent results from a 35mm w/flatbed.

Thank you for your reply, it was really helpful.


FAO - Flight Activities Officer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Comments On Slide Scanner Vs Flatbed: Cost/benefit posted Thu Mar 27 2003 03:55:58 by Mirrodie
Questions On Slide Adapter For Flatbed Scanner posted Mon Feb 26 2001 14:58:36 by Tomh
New 'liquid' Flatbed Scanner From Epson posted Wed Sep 13 2006 22:09:09 by 9VSPO
Flatbed Scanner Advice posted Wed Feb 26 2003 21:52:47 by BA777
Advice On A Film Scanner posted Thu Apr 4 2002 17:47:12 by MDL_777
Help On Buying A Scanner. posted Tue Jan 29 2002 14:51:47 by Cx flyboy
Looking For Opinions On A Slide-scanner posted Tue Jan 29 2002 14:12:40 by EDDP
Any Info On Microtech Scanner?s posted Fri Jun 15 2001 05:10:01 by MightyFalcon
Scanning Slides With A Plustek Scanner posted Sun Oct 29 2000 11:02:31 by OO-VEG
Help On Scanning Please posted Thu Feb 5 2004 04:28:20 by Britman