Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection Advise Required.  
User currently offlineStu1978 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 125 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1779 times:

Need a bit of advice on the following to see if its saveable.

The pic in question.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ons/big/20051230_IMG_03811play.jpg

Was originally rejected for being soft.....received a personal message from screener say to sharpen it by just a bit.

So I did and reuploaded it.

To then find it had been rejected again this time for being ....quality,angle and blurry.

So im slightly bemused as to what to do.......scrap it and start again or keep for personal collection .

Any advice or tips welcome.

Cheers

Stu

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1746 times:

Stu,

I would say it needs a little CCW rotation (judging by the plane's direction of travel the runway should be more angled). To me the photo looks sharp enough overall, but maybe a little more selective sharpening is needed on the tail.

I'd say it's worth persevering with this photo. It's a superbly timed shot.



Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1724 times:

Stu,

I don't understand why that was rejected. Brilliant shot. Could possibly need a little bit of sharpness around the tail. I'd be a little concerned about the small amount of grain in the sky there but other than those few things a great photo and wrongly rejected in my opinion.


User currently offlinePsyops From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1708 times:

Stu;

Often re-uploads are rejected with different reasons than the first rejection had listed. Not sure why this is, could be multiple different screeners who do not know why the shot was rejected the first time, if the know it was previously rejected at all.

For this shot, I'd say it deserves in but hey I'm not a screener.

For future if you get a rejection on a shot like this (i.e. not every shot that gets rejected but a real "winner" in your mind) then maybe post in forum for assistance prior to re-upload?

Pete


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1695 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello Stu,

This is a very interesting photo and, if it were mine, I would definitely persevere with another edit.

There are a few things that I can suggest that you might find increases its chances:

* Level - I think it needs over 1 degree CCW rotation. With the angle you are to the runway, there should be more of a slant to the runway surface. It should slope down more from the right to the left side of the photo. I would suggest using that 'grass' horizon in the far background as your horizontal reference, and that should do the trick.

* Crop - for me I would say that a 3:2 crop would suit the image better - that way there would be less 'dead' space, particularly the grass below the aircraft.

* Size - given the small quality issues I would strongly suggest a 1024 x 683 sized crop. I think things like the sharpness will then look better.

With these adjustments I would think it has a really good chance.

If you feel it would help you to have a look at an alternate edit feel free to get in touch and I will give it a go and show you the outcome.

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineStu1978 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 125 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

Thanks for the feedback

I'll rework the image and try again taking on board what has been mentioned.

Thanks

Stu


User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1639 times:

Any chance someone could tell me what's up with these two pics rejected for quality?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060101_ECHJP1.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060101_ECHJP.jpg


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bad Motive Rejection Advise Required. posted Wed Oct 26 2005 19:50:16 by Stu1978
And Another Motiv Rejection - Advise Please? posted Thu Sep 14 2006 18:34:22 by Acontador
Quality Rejection - Help Required posted Thu Jul 27 2006 22:34:20 by FUAirliner
Wrong Rejection? Advise Please posted Wed Nov 16 2005 23:11:59 by DRAIGONAIR
Rejection Assistance Required posted Tue Oct 11 2005 11:24:58 by Pumaknight
Low Quality Rejection Help Required posted Sun Dec 19 2004 12:55:54 by LHRSIMON
Need Some Rejection Advise posted Fri Oct 22 2004 14:36:11 by Paulianer
Help Required On A Rejection posted Thu Mar 30 2006 14:15:56 by JumboJim747
Urgent Advise On Print Sale Required! posted Tue Dec 7 2004 21:20:59 by LHRSIMON
Puzzled About "Double" Rejection posted Tue Dec 12 2006 07:00:40 by Walter2222