Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Blurry?  
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1064 times:

This one (and 2 others like it) got rejected for being "very blurry". Any thoughts?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=316223&size=lg



I wish I were flying
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1010 times:

J.T.,

That pictures does look pretty blurry. How does the original look - better? Did you scan a film/slide or a print? What kind of film did you use?

Charles


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 998 times:

Oops, I didn't scroll down far enough. Sensia 100 on an F80 should give you a much better result than this. As I said, is the original well in-focus?

Charles


User currently offlineJan Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 999 times:

Yes it is blurry.
/JM



AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 996 times:

Weird. On my screen there is no bad blur at all. Everything is sharp when checking with a loup (as well as the 30MB scanfile).



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5568 posts, RR: 64
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 991 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi

If it does not look blurry to you, you may need to get new glasses.

Very blurry to my eyes.

Regards
Gary Watt
Aberdeen, Scotland


User currently offlineGeorge From Netherlands, joined Apr 2000, 115 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 968 times:

Hi,

If you can't read the name of the plane on the nose or the titles "The Flying Dutchman" from that distance then for sure it is blurry.

Kind Regards, George Polfliet


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 950 times:

rescanned with adjusted focus. A lot sharper on the big file (30+MB), still readable on the uploaded one (600+KB)


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineCYKA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 940 times:

I think you should avoid shooting through glass. It introduces refelctions and scatters the light producing soft images.

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 939 times:

This was not taken through glass... Unless you mean the lens on the camera  Smile


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineScreener2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 938 times:

J.T.,

I just saw it. MUCH better. But there is a chance Johan might think it a little dark, especially in the shadows (could be fixed with gamma). We'll see.

Good luck.

S2


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 932 times:

Thanks. It was really that dark on the day. Heavy clouds and occasional showers. The scan may even be a bit brighter than the slide as it is  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSonic99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 926 times:


Could you post a link to the uploaded image? I'd like to sneek a peek at the re-worked photo.

Sonic99


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 13, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 916 times:

same as before, I replaced it. photo.net does sometimes cause some lossy compression so small details may be slightly distorted.


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 14, posted (12 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 894 times:

Guess Johan didn't like it. "poor quality" indeed... Not every day is a sunny day with perfect light...


I wish I were flying
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photos Blurry And I Don't Know Why posted Tue Feb 20 2007 04:12:24 by Jogales
Blurry Rejection Help Please posted Mon Dec 4 2006 18:19:13 by Kukkudrill
Quality Blurry Soft Oversharpened? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 11:58:07 by Andrei
Blurry Thumbnails posted Mon Nov 20 2006 01:56:47 by RobK
Need Help Finding The Blurry posted Wed Oct 25 2006 22:05:29 by DLKAPA
Blurry Rejection Advice Please posted Sun Oct 22 2006 19:58:16 by INNflight
Question For Quality/Blurry Rejection .... posted Sat Sep 16 2006 07:37:03 by TriStar501
Just Had The Rejected For "Blurry" posted Sun Jul 23 2006 22:16:34 by Cosec59
C-17 At SYD, Blurry, Some Guidance! posted Mon May 29 2006 01:28:19 by StealthZ
Being Blurry.....opinions posted Sun Apr 9 2006 18:41:57 by AKE0404AR