WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1308 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3619 times:
First I'd downsize from 1600 pixels to 1024. The quality at that size is not there. It also looks soft as well. And has a dull appearance in the color. It would be easier to see if the shot can make it if we saw the original file.
Walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1306 posts, RR: 27
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3536 times:
Thanks for your replies (JeffM & Wake Turbulence)!
As soon as I have my own PC repaired (it crashed on Friday, 13th), I will follow your advise (starting again from the original - which is on my PC - and limit it to 1024pix - then have a look again!). I am currently working from the kids' PC, which lacks my originals and which has a lower quality screen... so, I will refrain from uploading from this station! (I had the idea that at 1600pix, more detail from the original would remain, but I see now that rejection is also more likely at that size!).