WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 18 Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 6 hours ago) and read 1986 times:
First I'd downsize from 1600 pixels to 1024. The quality at that size is not there. It also looks soft as well. And has a dull appearance in the color. It would be easier to see if the shot can make it if we saw the original file.
-Matt
Walter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, RR: 30 Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1903 times:
Thanks for your replies (JeffM & Wake Turbulence)!
As soon as I have my own PC repaired (it crashed on Friday, 13th), I will follow your advise (starting again from the original - which is on my PC - and limit it to 1024pix - then have a look again!). I am currently working from the kids' PC, which lacks my originals and which has a lower quality screen... so, I will refrain from uploading from this station! (I had the idea that at 1600pix, more detail from the original would remain, but I see now that rejection is also more likely at that size!).
Sponsor Message: 
From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1272 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1288 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
