Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Help On A Quality Rejection!  
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, RR: 51
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3483 times:

Hi,

Just now I got a rejection, linked below. Reason is quality.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0060208_C_FFYM_hhuo8472_060128.jpg

Screener who was screening this shot dropped a message to me - "poor detail on main wheels". Could anyone give me some suggestions about how to further improve this shot, especially for the main wheels?

Thanks in advance,
_Hongyin_  wave 

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 65
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3474 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Looks pretty good to me, but perhaps there was some lightening of the area around the main gear? Can't really tell, my eyes are tired Smile

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineTom3 From Luxembourg, joined Apr 2004, 240 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3460 times:

Quoting Bubbles (Thread starter):
"poor detail on main wheels"

 Confused


Looks very good the picture ! Why Bad Quality  banghead 

IMO reupload the shot and it will be get accepted !

Cheers

Tom



Tom Mousel - Lap
User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 43
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3459 times:

Quoting Tom3 (Reply 2):
IMO reupload the shot and it will be get accepted !

or try to appeal it. that´s a good option, too.

Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineTom3 From Luxembourg, joined Apr 2004, 240 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3447 times:

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 3):
or try to appeal it. that´s a good option, too.

Oder so !  bigthumbsup 


Tom



Tom Mousel - Lap
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 33
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3441 times:

Hongyin,

There's some blurring/fringing around the main gear tyres. Unusual, because the rest of the aircraft is really nice and sharp. You might be able to pull a bit more detail out with very careful use of the dodge tool.

Quoting Tom3 (Reply 2):
IMO reupload the shot and it will be get accepted !

They shoot people for that.



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 41
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3435 times:

Clearly bad quality. The serial number identiplates on the nose landing gear strut are a bit soft, and unreadable.  

Keep trying though!

Seriously - great shot, I'd appeal that sucker. There should be some kind of message generated to a screener when one of his rejections is accepted in the appeal process. I wonder if that would get our point across.

Drew  

[Edited 2006-02-09 01:27:43]


I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1193 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3419 times:

Thank you all for your comments! I will carefully consider what I should do for this shot.  Smile

Appeal failure will consume my acceptance ratio by 2% more. I have been aware of another thread currently in this forum, talking about acceptance ratio. I feel embarrassed to even see myself one.  embarrassed 

Thanks again!

_Hongyin_  wave 


User currently offlineChristhurtell From Australia, joined Apr 2004, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3411 times:

Quoting Sulman (Reply 5):

There's some blurring/fringing around the main gear tyres. Unusual, because the rest of the aircraft is really nice and sharp. You might be able to pull a bit more detail out with very careful use of the dodge tool.

I'd be more inclined to think that was heat dispertion from the engines causing that effect. Just my 2c


User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3383 times:

I personally would kill the jaggies on the following:

1. Rear stabiliser.
2. "Air Canada" on the front.
3. The doors - top of front and rear.
4. Leading edge of wing.

Then re-upload. Then it SHOULD be accepted. But then again...


User currently offlineAdministrator From Sweden, joined May 1999, 3251 posts.
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3343 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
SITE ADMIN

That one should definitely be accepted - we only have one other shot of this aircraft in the database! Appeal, it's an immediate acceptance. The screener must have made a mistake rejecting.

Regards,
Johan



Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright (1997-2007)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help With Quality Rejection posted Fri Sep 29 2006 11:38:26 by UnattendedBag
Help With 'quality ' Rejection Please. posted Sun Sep 24 2006 12:30:39 by Nucky
Help On Colour Rejection Please! posted Sun May 7 2006 00:46:07 by ZSOFN
Help On Quality Needed posted Thu May 4 2006 18:34:55 by OlegShv
Help On Quality posted Sun Apr 16 2006 20:39:27 by Flamedude707
Advice On A Quality Rejection posted Mon Jan 2 2006 01:58:24 by DC10Tim
Your Thoughts On A Quality Rejection posted Fri Dec 30 2005 12:21:13 by Psych
Advice On Quality Rejection? posted Thu Dec 29 2005 15:02:57 by Jran225
Help On This Rejection posted Sat Nov 19 2005 00:40:04 by Work4bmi
Help With Quality Rejection posted Mon Oct 31 2005 01:43:51 by FUAirliner