Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question For LAX Spotters  
User currently offlineCaptainJon From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 2 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 5696 times:

i was recently in LAX and stayed at the radisson on w century blvd. even though i was in the middle of rwy 6R/7L i saw a lot of planes on final approach, where was the good spot to take pictures i seen on this site. apparently i read they were taken from the lounge upstairs, but theres full of windows and the outside deck is for smokers as its a small area facing i think 7L.

any help is appreciated for next time.
thanks

49 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDlx737200 From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1891 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 5689 times:

What is your question? The Radisson is a great location for landings on 24L/R.


The public: They always know better, even though they often know nothing
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 5689 times:

Go to the In-N-Out Burger right off the end of Runway 24R, almost touch the landers


Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5689 times:

Im going to LA tommorrow so ill have a look for lots of new places to shoot from! Im staying at the raddison too so im sure i can find somewhere to shoot from.

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5689 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 2):
Go to the In-N-Out Burger right off the end of Runway 24R, almost touch the landers

IN-N-OUT is only good in the summer. That spot will most likely be backlit this time of year.

I was just at LAX and stayed at the Radisson. Go to the back of the lounge and walk out the door.. To get arrivals on 24R you have to actually walk on the roof to get the shot. It's not hard, just step up and walk out a ways. I would sit in the lounge and listen to my transceiver. When something good was coming in I would walk on the roof and shoot it. Here are one of my shots.

http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-12/905683/virginnikv.jpg

Nobody gives you any trouble up there and you meet good people who come up to spot.


User currently offlineSouthpaw8669 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 141 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5689 times:

Let me just say one thing about this spot, make sure that you are a guest of the hotel or you may be asked to leave. When I was there last, we did have a police encounter. We were able to stay after showing identification and Room keys. I would also not recommend going out onto the roof, you should be able to get good shots from the small outdoor area there is.


Eric



@southpawcapture
User currently offlineJakbar From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 442 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5688 times:

I agree with Eric. If you are not a guest of the hotel, you should definitely be prepared to leave if they ask. And do not go out on the roof itself...you can get plenty of good shots from the little outdoor area. I spent a lot of time up there on my recent LAX trip, and my pictures came out great. If you go out on the roof, and they catch you up there, you risk ruining things for hotel guests who go up there to watch the airplanes. The best thing to do is hang out inside in the lounge, and when you see something in the distance, go outside and shoot it quickly, and then come back inside and sit in one of the chairs. The policeman who came up and hassled us said that he could see us hanging around in the outdoor area when he was driving around on the street, and that it looked suspicious. Since it is private property, it's better to be safe than sorry.

[Edited 2006-02-15 22:44:35]

User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5679 times:

Quoting Chris78cpr (Reply 3):
Im going to LA tommorrow

Really? I Hadnt noticed...

Funnily enough... so am i... :P



Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineQANTAS077 From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5825 posts, RR: 41
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5676 times:

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 6):
I agree with Eric. If you are not a guest of the hotel, you should definitely be prepared to leave if they ask. And do not go out on the roof itself...you can get plenty of good shots from the little outdoor area. I spent a lot of time up there on my recent LAX trip, and my pictures came out great. If you go out on the roof, and they catch you up there, you risk ruining things for hotel guests who go up there to watch the airplanes. The best thing to do is hang out inside in the lounge, and when you see something in the distance, go outside and shoot it quickly, and then come back inside and sit in one of the chairs. The policeman who came up and hassled us said that he could see us hanging around in the outdoor area when he was driving around on the street, and that it looked suspicious. Since it is private property, it's better to be safe than sorry.

exactly what he said, they'll make you buy something when the bar is setup also!



a true friend is someone who sees the pain in your eyes, while everyone else believes the smile on your face.
User currently offlineCaptainJon From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5661 times:

well when i was there, the roof/lounge was closed and opend at 5. the
deck access from what i remember was small and seemed to accomonidate
only smokers. the lounge itself was surrounded by glass and didnt want
to take through glass.


User currently offlineF9Widebody From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1604 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5654 times:

Quoting Chris78cpr (Reply 3):
Im going to LA tommorrow so ill have a look for lots of new places to shoot from! Im staying at the raddison too so im sure i can find somewhere to shoot from.

Great to see you shooting/uploading again. I will be waiting for those shots!

Regards



YES URLS in signature!!!
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5651 times:

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 6):
And do not go out on the roof itself...you can get plenty of good shots from the little outdoor area. I spent a lot of time up there on my recent LAX trip, and my pictures came out great. If you go out on the roof, and they catch you up there, you risk ruining things for hotel guests who go up there to watch the airplanes.

Well Mr. Akbar the night before I asked a bartender and then the person at the desk and they were fine with it as long as I didn't go too far out on the roof or hang out on the roof for a long period of time. I explained that I would only walk out a ways and get the shot and return to the lounge. Which if you read my post a little more carefully you would have seen this. Instead of being in a hurry to accuse me of irresponsible spotting. I know as far as you are concerned I am reckless when it comes to spotting but this is not the case.

I do agree with Eric as to being a guest of the hotel but as long as you make your intentions known and act properly I see nothing wrong with stepping on the roof and getting a better angle shot of 24R arrivals.

Quoting QANTAS077 (Reply 8):
they'll make you buy something when the bar is setup also!

No stress, I had a few VO and 7s while I was there!  biggrin 

Quoting CaptainJon (Reply 9):
well when i was there, the roof/lounge was closed and opend at 5. the
deck access from what i remember was small and seemed to accomonidate
only smokers. the lounge itself was surrounded by glass and didnt want
to take through glass.

You can hang out in the lounge before they open, there was many people coming up and some had cameras and some did not. One guy had binoculars and was writing down tail #s. Outside. Mr. Akbar was well intentioned with this advice but don't let it scare you from a nice day of spotting, as I have said if you make you are a guest and make your intentions known you can go up there.


User currently offlineDLX737200 From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1891 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5628 times:

Quoting F9Widebody (Reply 10):
Great to see you shooting/uploading again. I will be waiting for those shots!

Not to speak for him but Chris has been shooting quite a lot lately. He has told me he's just rather backlogged in his editing. From what I know, he still has to edit MCO (when I met him in Sept), SXM, LAX (when I hung out with him a month ago again), and INN recently. Chris has done a lot of shooting. We hung out at LAX on the 13th (January) together all day and shot quite a lot. I guess this weekend he'll have a little more time to shoot than last. Enjoy Chris!

-Justin



The public: They always know better, even though they often know nothing
User currently offlineJakbar From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 442 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5619 times:

Give it a rest, Nick. No need to get defensive, and particularly no need to start with attitude. I have never said you were an irresponsible spotter, but your advocating that people climb out onto the roof of a hotel -- and I do mean "climb", because that is exactly what you have to do to get from the designated area onto the actual roof -- is beginning to point me in that direction.

Regardless of what kind of sage advice you may want to impart in this thread, the simple fact is that we were approached by police and the head of security for the hotel -- not some schlub at the bar or a lackey checking people in -- and were told unequivocally not to go out on the roof. Just because someone who pours drinks for a living or is great at asking whether you want a smoking or non-smoking room gives you their oh-so-informed opinion as to whether it is OK to go out on the roof, that doesn't mean you should do it. You need to use a little common sense and ask yourself "Hmmm...do I think the hotel really wants people climbing onto the actual roof, and do they want me preaching to 1000s of people on the internet to do the same?"

The police and the hotel security officer permitted us to continue shooting in the outside area only because we were guests of the hotel, and they also made it very clear that they did not want us out on that roof due to the liability issues. So despite your advice, I issue a strong word of caution to anyone who reserves a room at the Radisson and decides to do some shooting from the outdoor area on the top floor: do not go out on the roof or else you will risk screwing things up for yourself and others. Don't get me wrong -- you can have an awesome time spotting up there in the designated outdoor area, and you can get some damn nice pictures. But just keep in mind that you are on private property, and exercise a little common sense.

When we are at LAX a few weeks ago, five of us were able to stand outside at the designated area and get pictures just like the one you posted above, including with the very same building in the picture. And none of us had to climb onto the roof to get it.


User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5600 times:

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 13):
Give it a rest, Nick. No need to get defensive, and particularly no need to start with attitude

Not getting defensive at all, just pointing out that your statements are not accurate and for the most part are biased.

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 13):
I have never said you were an irresponsible spotter, but your advocating that people climb out onto the roof of a hotel -- and I do mean "climb", because that is exactly what you have to do to get from the designated area onto the actual roof -- is beginning to point me in that direction.

You did try to paint me as irresponsible. What you talk about with your local pals is one thing. Here I am going to defend myself. I am not advocating anything. I merely gave some advice to a person who is going to shoot there.

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 13):
not some schlub at the bar or a lackey checking people in --

I have to say this comment is typical. Not everybody can be a lawyer Josh. To degrade two working men like this is sad. A totally tasteless and unnecessary comment.

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 13):
Just because someone who pours drinks for a living or is great at asking whether you want a smoking or non-smoking room gives you their oh-so-informed opinion as to whether it is OK to go out on the roof, that doesn't mean you should do it.

Again Josh I don't understand your disdain for the working man, and how do you know the person behind the front desk was not a manager or something? That is funny but I never took you for an elitist. If you want to respond to me please do, but cease the digs at the hotel employees, they have no way to defend themselves and quite frankly to insult them like you have is pretty lame.

Of course I feel you are overreacting to my taking pictures on the roof as nothing more than a opening to take a dig at me. I know full well that the hotel is private property Josh. I wasn't born yesterday and contrary to your belief I can conduct myself properly when I spot.

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 13):
The police and the hotel security Officer permitted us to continue shooting in the outside area only because we were guests of the hotel, and they also made it very clear that they did not want us out on that roof due to the liability issues. So despite your advice, I issue a strong word of caution to anyone who reserves a room at the Radisson and decides to do some shooting from the outdoor area on the top floor: do not go out on the roof or else you will risk screwing things up for yourself and others. Don't get me wrong -- you can have an awesome time spotting up there in the designated outdoor area, and you can get some damn nice pictures. But just keep in mind that you are on private property, and exercise a little common sense.

Great advice Josh, I find this encounter with local PD and hotel security strange though. I was up there literally all day and nothing remotely close to your encounter happened. Did you say a police Officer saw you from Century? When I was there at least 30 people came through, some shot, some spotted some where outside and nothing happened. Sounds like you are embellishing it a bit.

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 13):
When we are at LAX a few weeks ago, five of us were able to stand outside at the designated area and get pictures just like the one you posted above, including with the very same building in the picture. And none of us had to climb onto the roof to get it.

I tend to doubt that Josh, if my memory serves me right that shot is impossible from that area you speak of. If you shoot from the little smoking area outside the door the angle will not be the same.

[Edited 2006-02-16 05:00:33]

User currently offlineQANTAS077 From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5825 posts, RR: 41
Reply 15, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5594 times:

right...it's like this, go on the roof and you risk messing it up for others, stay off it! police found them without any effort, if police managed to spot us then the area must under some sort of watch...stay off the roof! plain and simple, even the barman on my first visit at the Radisson said to stay off..this was around 3pm when they arrived to setup.

The balcony area where the smokers bin is setup has a metal baracade, it's obvious what it's in place for..i took a few from the roof, when i was told not to go back on it i didn't. this happend to me once in my first visit and to Josh et al on there visit.



a true friend is someone who sees the pain in your eyes, while everyone else believes the smile on your face.
User currently offlineJakbar From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 442 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5587 times:

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 14):
Again Josh I don't understand your disdain for the working man

The "working man"? Give me a break! What I have disdain for is promoting on this website -- a website where thousands of people visit every day -- that people should climb out onto the roof of a hotel to shoot pictures. That is irresponsible, and if a decision-maker from Radisson saw what you were advocating, they'd probably prohibit people from going out to the outdoor area with cameras altogether or at least put up a tall obstructive fence that prevents people from getting on the roof and also gets in the way of the pictures. What I think is particularly bad advice is to tell people that because the person behind the bar, or the guy at the front desk, told you it was OK, then it must be OK. This is, of course, notwithstanding the fact that it strains common sense to rely on the "authority" of such a person to give you that permission and that it strains common sense that you'd be allowed onto the roof of a hotel in any event. And to correct your misapprehension about my intentions, this is not meant at a dig at you personally; if Phil, Art or anyone else was making such comments, I would respond just the same.

If I may offer you a piece of advice, it is bad form to always assume that people are out to get you or that they have ulterior motives. While that may be true for others on this site, it is not true for me, and my only goal here is to temper your initial comments with a bit of practical advice so that the person who posted the original post can understand that it's not necessarily perfectly OK to go climbing out on the roof.

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 14):
Sounds like you are embellishing it a bit.

The policeman told us he could see us "from the ground" and that he came up because it looked suspicious. We were not even on the roof, but instead merely standing at the outdoor area. Sorry, no embellishment there.

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 14):
I tend to doubt that Josh

Doubt it all you want. I have pictures like that.


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 45
Reply 17, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5578 times:

You're completely missing the point, Nick. For someone who is so gung-ho about fighting for spotter rights and having a good time out at the airport, you don't seem to realize that beggars can't be choosers.

The LAX Radisson is extending a HUGE courtesy to everybody - not just guests - by keeping the lounge open and available past the restaurant's hours of operation (and even during, provided you buy something). To take advantage of their tolerance towards aviation enthusiasm by jumping the fence and walking on to their roof is quite the slap in the face, whether that's what you intend for it to be or not. As far as I'm concerned, they've offered you a hand and you're taking the whole damn arm.

They've prettymuch given us free unsupervised reign up there, and the only way we can show our appreciation is by being sensible and responsible adults - not impulsive and desperate aviation photographers. Always remember that the ripple effect is a major part of this hobby; it just takes one person acting irresponsibly to put the entire population at a disadvantage. If you - or anybody - do anything to adversely affect one of the most popular spots at LAX, you will most definitely lose most (if not all) of whatever credibility, respect, and friends you have gained since you started. To me, it's not worth it.

Frankly, if you show the people at the Radisson the same lack of respect you're showing us in this thread, I fear for us all.

Brian

[Edited 2006-02-16 06:18:43]


What the FUTT?
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5575 times:

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 16):
The "working man"? Give me a break!

I did, I asked why you would insult two people you never even met like that, thanks for not anwering the question.

Quoting Jakbar (Reply 16):
What I have disdain for is promoting on this website -- a website where thousands of people visit every day -- that people should climb out onto the roof of a hotel to shoot pictures. That is irresponsible, and if a decision-maker from Radisson saw what you were advocating, they'd probably prohibit people from going out to the outdoor area with cameras altogether or at least put up a tall obstructive fence that prevents people from getting on the roof and also gets in the way of the pictures. What I think is particularly bad advice is to tell people that because the person behind the bar, or the guy at the front desk, told you it was OK, then it must be OK. This is, of course, notwithstanding the fact that it strains common sense to rely on the "authority" of such a person to give you that permission and that it strains common sense that you'd be allowed onto the roof of a hotel in any event.

I doubt the Radisson will be erecting a big wall tomorrow Josh. I respect your concern for the spotting public but I doubt my shooting from the spot I shot at is as dire as you make it.


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 45
Reply 19, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5571 times:

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 18):
I doubt my shooting from the spot I shot at is as dire as you make it.

While you may doubt it, Josh, Monty, Smith, and myself are all sure. When the LAPD and certain members of the Radisson staff expressed an apprehension towards our being out taking photos from behind the rail, it's downright stupid to assume that they wouldn't have a problem with someone running around on the roof.

Let me ask you, Nick: what would your initial thoughts be if you saw someone on the roof of a hotel at an airport? Or at a marina? Or a train station?

As Josh said before, it is a massive liability for the hotel. If break your leg up there, take a wild guess as to what will happen to the spot. I forget which airport it was at, but a very popular and legitimate spotting location was closed off after a girl was raped, and despite the fact that the incident is unrelated to spotting, it's obvious that it had a profound effect.

Brian



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5541 times:

Quoting Futterman (Reply 19):
While you may doubt it, Josh, Monty, Smith, and myself are all sure. When the LAPD and certain members of the Radisson staff expressed an apprehension towards our being out taking photos from behind the rail, it's downright stupid to assume that they wouldn't have a problem with someone running around on the roof.

Again Brian I was not "running around on the roof" I would attempt to explain it to you but it would be a waste of good oyxgen. I don't know what happened to you and your little group and quite frankly I don't care. I know that the staff that I dealth was fine with me grabbing a few shots from the roof and I made the effort to tell hotel staff what I was doing. I know as far as your buddy Josh is concerned these means nothing since one served drinks for a living and the other worked behind the desk but I had none of these problems you encountered.

Quoting Futterman (Reply 19):
Let me ask you, Nick: what would your initial thoughts be if you saw someone on the roof of a hotel at an airport? Or at a marina? Or a train station?

Nothing at all Brian. If someone wanted to harm a plane, train or boat I was going to get on they sure would not be on a roof in plain view.

Quoting Futterman (Reply 19):
As Josh said before, it is a massive liability for the hotel. If break your leg up there, take a wild guess as to what will happen to the spot. I forget which airport it was at, but a very popular and legitimate spotting location was closed off after a girl was raped, and despite the fact that the incident is unrelated to spotting, it's obvious that it had a profound effect.

Profound effect? I would guess it had something to do with the location of the rape and most likely happened at an obscure hour. Don't worry Brian next time I am at the Radisson I won't rape anybody up there.


User currently offlineQANTAS077 From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5825 posts, RR: 41
Reply 21, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5535 times:

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 20):
I don't know what happened to you and your little group and quite frankly I don't care.

nothing happend to us, i said a time and a place and you weren't there, i rang around to the guys in LA to see if they knew your location and they didn't...i was in the exact spot, at the exact time i said i would be! one thing to learn, i wait for nobody! if my instructions weren't obvious and clear enough then sobeit.

as for the hotel, feel free to go on the roof, if they shut it down we'll know who to drop over the edge from the top floor. Think of the spotters from LA that use it before thinking of yourselves.



a true friend is someone who sees the pain in your eyes, while everyone else believes the smile on your face.
User currently offlineJAT74L From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 618 posts, RR: 15
Reply 22, posted (8 years 2 months 4 days ago) and read 5509 times:

On a slightly lighter note...

Nick,

What mm lens is advisable for the roof (oops sorry I mean lounge) at the Radisson?  wink 

John



I like trains just as much as planes but trains don't like the Atlantic!
User currently offlineBigphilnyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4076 posts, RR: 54
Reply 23, posted (8 years 2 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5494 times:

Like with any spotting location, I think it’s important that a balance between legality, personal safety, and social consideration for other spotters be maintained at all times. This means that each and every spotter has the responsibility to not only follow the law, but to act in a way that fairly represents the entire hobby of aviation enthusiasm so to not destroy or create a negative reputation of us, or affect our ability to utilize spots that we enjoy.

This means not abusing property rules and abiding by permissions granted only by genuine authority figures of that location. Bottom line.

If there is a spotting location that has some kind of risk, it’s important that people not push the button without the clear, expressed consent of those who are an authority of that location. This does not mean bending the rules or creating excuses so that one can get away with getting a good shot, while putting at risk their own personal safety, and the integrity of enthusiasts in general.

As for the Radisson specifically, I think it’s a great spot that can easily get out of hand if people abuse it. It’s a location that offers easy abuse in the sense that it would not take much to anger someone or have the police called, even in a comfortable spotting airport like LAX.

I think people who want to utilize that spot should be guests at the hotel and stay within the designated walking area outside of those doors, unless they have specific consent from hotel management on a case by case basis. I don’t think that a bartender is of enough authority to grant such permission. I also feel that walking out onto that roof can be a risk to one’s personal safety at times.

All we need to remember is that it’s important that we do what we should be doing and be considerate of other spotters. This argument that has started here is completely unnecessary and works against what we are all here to do…..enjoy our passion for commercial aviation.



Phil Derner Jr.
User currently offlineFallingeese From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2097 posts, RR: 18
Reply 24, posted (8 years 2 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5475 times:

Quoting Bigphilnyc (Reply 23):
All we need to remember is that it’s important that we do what we should be doing and be considerate of other spotters. This argument that has started here is completely unnecessary and works against what we are all here to do…..enjoy our passion for commercial aviation.

Well said Phil. I will be in LAX tomorrow and enjoying the Radisson. That being said I and the other individuals who are going down are competent spotters and respectful to the situation.

Why on earth people would go around the barrier on the deck is beyond me. There is a barrier in place for a specific reason.

NIKV69 - Honestly your attitude sucks and you seem to be well beyond the understanding of reason.



Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
25 Post contains links and images AviatorTJ : I'll pick this up for Nick. Narrowbodies are about full frame in a 300mm neighborhood. Widebodies are 150-200mm depending on left or right runway. Vi
26 BigPhilNYC : I would like to carify that I'm not bashing Nick's argument, nor Josh's. Both of them know each other and I know that they wouldn't let this kind ofco
27 Post contains images JAT74L : I'm glad you added that Phil. I agree that we shouldn't abuse priviledges and maybe it wasn't such a good idea to advise folks that it's ok to go on
28 BigPhilNYC : . Philler[Edited 2006-02-16 20:45:05]
29 NIKV69 : If you are referring to leaving me at LAS Monty, you told me you were picking up your rental at the Alamo counter after you landed. I was at that cou
30 BigPhilNYC : Regardless of who said what, I think the tangent of drama that has been going on here should be kept to a private forum. No one pays $5 a month to rea
31 JAT74L : Let's put a lid on this then. Anyhow, I've just found out that good old Virgin Atlantic can get me out to LAX in Upper Class on miles but can't get me
32 Post contains images NIKV69 : My schedule is a little crazy in May John but I will try to get free and shoot with you. Worst case is we can throw a few back that night!
33 JAT74L : If that's the worst case scenario Nick it'll do for me!! Is there a good hotel for views just in case I don't get to meet up during the day? I'll mail
34 Post contains links NIKV69 : JFK is your best bet. On foot it will be tough but I will try to get free and drive you around. Here is a link from Art Brett's site. It shows the goo
35 TWAMD-80 : So is there a dedicated outside observation area, or is it just the roof? I am planning on staying at the Radisson in the next couple of days and I'd
36 Benyhone : Tim, There is a small, fenced, outdoor patio/walkway adjacent to the rooftop bar. Just go up to the bar and you'll see the door leading outside. It's
37 Runway23 : I'd be careful of standing on the roof as you are visible miles out (infact could see people on the roof on my last two departures from LAX without an
38 Post contains images SATX : I'm one blind mofo... Stayed at the Radisson, went up to the bar area one night, didn't notice any door, got a whisky sour, glanced around, still didn
39 Jid : I shall tell you from someone who has just come back from the Radisson. Some of the hotel security staff do not mind you going out on to the roof, tak
40 Post contains images NIKV69 : Yes you are! That door is quite easy to see. Glad you didn't cave into the fear mongers here (see reply 6 and 13) and went about things the same way
41 UA935 : Although you might have one hell of a suntan!
42 Fallingeese : It isn't much of a challenge to see people up there at all. We were on Imperial Hill and we knew who we were looking at on the top of the Radisson. S
43 Post contains images NIKV69 : Granted, there were many people up there while I was up there. Some with cameras and some just writing down regis. It is not a big deal. LOL, yes. Th
44 QANTAS077 : for those who need it spelt out to them, why you ask was it so easy for them to spot us, give you 1 guess? no i won't, i'll answer it for you! El Al
45 Mxp : Hi people, suggestions for an hotel near the In-N-Out Burger on Selpuveda Boulevard? I hope to came in end of May and want to stay one day in LAX spot
46 NIKV69 : This will never happen Mr. Monty. I doubt there is going to be this rash of spotters who are going to run out on the roof and yell "Hey Nick from ane
47 QANTAS077 : read my last reply, i was actually asked to not go on the roof on my first visit to the Radisson of which i was a guest, that was 10 days before the
48 Jid : As Monty says .. When El Al is due they WILL know you are there and if they assess you as a threat they WILL take action. "They" not necessarily meani
49 MattWS : Nick, if you are in any doubt how visible you (or anyone else) can be on the roof I have a shot taken from right under the 24R glideslope on Sepulveda
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Another Question For ZRH Spotters! posted Tue May 6 2003 11:36:10 by Spotterboy
Question For Hardcore Spotters/enthusiasts posted Thu Apr 10 2003 23:08:54 by ANA777master
A Question For DEN Spotters posted Tue Oct 1 2002 08:46:22 by An-225
Question For The Dutch Spotters posted Fri Sep 29 2006 13:38:22 by Spotterke
LAX SPOTTERS: Help For Dads Retirement posted Sat Aug 28 2004 19:54:01 by Smithfly114
A Question For Boeing Employees About Spotters. posted Wed Aug 21 2002 22:10:13 by ExitRow
Question For Quality/Blurry Rejection .... posted Sat Sep 16 2006 07:37:03 by TriStar501
Question For CLT A.netters posted Sat Aug 26 2006 23:12:20 by Nirmalmakadia
A Question For Screeners... posted Wed May 17 2006 11:57:41 by Chris78cpr
Calling On All LAX Spotters posted Fri Apr 28 2006 16:03:21 by Singapore_Air
A Question For DEN Spotters posted Tue Oct 1 2002 08:46:22 by An-225
Question For The Dutch Spotters posted Fri Sep 29 2006 13:38:22 by Spotterke
LAX SPOTTERS: Help For Dads Retirement posted Sat Aug 28 2004 19:54:01 by Smithfly114
A Question For Boeing Employees About Spotters. posted Wed Aug 21 2002 22:10:13 by ExitRow
Question For MXP Spotters posted Mon May 9 2011 04:02:28 by dennys