Codeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted
Sat Feb 18 2006 23:14:10 UTC (9 years 3 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4429 times:
Since you use a Canon, I think, you might look at the Canon 17-40 f/4 L lens. It will be fine for the aviation needs.
I use a Nikon and a 18-35 mm lens with that. Works good.
How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
Interpaul From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 409 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted
Sat Feb 18 2006 23:39:27 UTC (9 years 3 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 4415 times:
I currently use the 24-70 2.8 L and I'm very pleased with it. It's still wide enough with the 1.3 crop factor.
I'm still looking for a 15mm diagonal fisheye, though.
UA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 612 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted
Sat Feb 18 2006 23:44:58 UTC (9 years 3 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 4414 times:
I use the 17-40L and I love it.
Live every second like you mean it
Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 00:25:43 UTC (9 years 3 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 4394 times:
Sigma 18-35 DC lens is the one for me currently.
Looking to go wider in the near future.
Ryan h From Australia, joined Aug 2001, 1596 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 00:49:35 UTC (9 years 3 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4386 times:
I use the Canon EFS 17-85
South Australian Spotter
Gmonney From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2160 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 01:56:19 UTC (9 years 3 months 5 days ago) and read 4378 times:
17-40L is fantastic... hard to get it stuff throught he fence... 77mm Diameter... but i get by zoomed in at 40mm
Drive it like you stole it!
INNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3781 posts, RR: 59
Reply 7, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 02:25:37 UTC (9 years 3 months 5 days ago) and read 4369 times:
17-40L user over here - And loving it!
IMO, one of the best lenses in terms of price vs. quality.
Love to shoot with a polarizer on it, excellent (non-av)-stuff.
DC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1406 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 02:43:02 UTC (9 years 3 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4364 times:
I use the standard Canon 18-55 EFS lens that came with my 300D. Despite it's critics, I've had no problems at all with it.
Obviously missing something....
JetAv8r From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 03:47:30 UTC (9 years 3 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4359 times:
Sigma 10-20, but I haven't really had a chance to put it to use yet so I can't tell you whether or not I recommend it, but let me just say I'm glad I didn't settle for 17mm! I can't wait to try it out on a few panels.
WhyWhyZed From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 914 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 04:46:24 UTC (9 years 3 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4352 times:
I have the 17-40L f/4 and the 18-55 kit lens. I mostly use the 17-40L though. If I do need the little bit extra mm's then I use my 50mm f/1.8
- Jason DePodesta
GFKbored From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 29 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 05:48:50 UTC (9 years 3 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4344 times:
the Canon 17-40L is a good lens but for those of us that have to keep lens costs within the real world, I suggest either the Canon 17-85
IS USM, or the Sigma 17-35 2.8-4.
Tin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 08:14:41 UTC (9 years 3 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4332 times:
I use a EF17-40 f/4 L and EF24-70 f/2.8 L. Both excellent lenses and highly recommended.
Mfz From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 260 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted
Sun Feb 19 2006 12:30:15 UTC (9 years 3 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4308 times:
I can only confirm the other comments regarding the Canon EF 17-40L f/4 which I also find an excellent lens and I am 100% happy with it. However, I am looking for an addition to my lens-collection which is even wider and am seriously considering the Sigma EX 12-24. As I want to use the lens on both DSLR as well as analog SLR the Canon EF-S 10-22 is no option for me. Does anyone have experience with the Sigma 12-24? Can you recommend it?
Thanks for any info! Cheers,
Extra Bavariam non est vita et si est non est ita! --- My flights: http://my.flightmemory.com/mfz