Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejection For Jaggies  
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2116 times:

I had this one rejected for jaggies. Can someone tell me where they are? I can't see them. Maybe I need a new screen ....

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ons/big/20060221_060211oovlzv1.jpg


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2116 times:

The reg is jagged, the cheatline and the starboardtitle ...

Robin



ABC
User currently offlineMartin21 From Netherlands, joined Aug 2001, 347 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2106 times:

Also the gear doors in the engine. Try reducing the USM.

Martin21



At 30.000 feet, the sun always shines !
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2093 times:

You know, minor sharpening artefacts aside, that looks okay to me. Maybe my work monitor.

You've used 500/0.2/0 haven't you? Some moire / artefacting is impossible to avoid. You can tell I've not uploaded shots like this in a while.

Cheers


James

[Edited 2006-02-22 16:22:27]


It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2089 times:

Quoting Sulman (Reply 3):
You've used 500/0.2/0 haven't you?

Exactly. I can see the jaggies on the gear doors ...



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineRuudonline From Netherlands, joined Feb 2006, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 2055 times:

The next thing is that they reject this photo of Purple Fringe (see the purple and orange colors around the frontwheel)...

Ruud


User currently offlineMartin21 From Netherlands, joined Aug 2001, 347 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 2034 times:

Quoting Ruudonline (Reply 5):
The next thing is that they reject this photo of Purple Fringe (see the purple and orange colors around the frontwheel)...

I think this is caused by the over sharpening.

Martin21



At 30.000 feet, the sun always shines !
User currently offlineRuudOnline From Netherlands, joined Feb 2006, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 1994 times:

Quote:
I think this is caused by the over sharpening.

Nah...its caused by a less quality lens. Which does not matter because I like the photo as it is now (even with does damn jaggies).

Ruud


User currently offlineTom3 From Luxembourg, joined Apr 2004, 240 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 1991 times:

Quoting RuudOnline (Reply 7):
Nah...its caused by a less quality lens.

Less quality lens ?


I've in my mind that Vivion is using a Nikkor 80-400mm , and that's a high quality lens !


Cheers

Tom



Tom Mousel - Lap
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 1986 times:

Quoting Tom3 (Reply 8):
Vivion is using a Nikkor 80-400mm

Yes!I like my lens!



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineMartin21 From Netherlands, joined Aug 2001, 347 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 1983 times:

Quoting Tom3 (Reply 8):
Less quality lens ?


I've in my mind that Vivion is using a Nikkor 80-400mm , and that's a high quality lens !

My thoughts !

Martin21



At 30.000 feet, the sun always shines !
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 1972 times:

Thanks to all for your helpful comments. I have reworked the original with a bit less USM and uploaded it again. Let's see what happens.


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlinePitchul From Luxembourg, joined Jan 2005, 121 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 1962 times:

Good luck viv.

Emmanuel


User currently offlineMartin21 From Netherlands, joined Aug 2001, 347 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 1953 times:

Can you show us your new uploaded version ?

Martin21



At 30.000 feet, the sun always shines !
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1934 times:

Quoting Pitchul (Reply 12):
new uploaded version

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/060211oovlzv2.jpg



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlinePitchul From Luxembourg, joined Jan 2005, 121 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1931 times:

Quoting Viv (Reply 14):
Quoting Pitchul (Reply 12):
new uploaded version

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...2.jpg

Ok the jaggy are now gone  Smile

EMmanuel


User currently offlineGVerbeeck From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 245 posts, RR: 24
Reply 16, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1929 times:

It looks a little soft now to be honest. You should give selective sharpening a try: sharpen your photo as the original, and just remove the jaggies with the eraser brush (with different opacities).

Also, there's a dustspot in the sky down from the reg.

Giovanni


User currently offlineMartin21 From Netherlands, joined Aug 2001, 347 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

Have to agree with Giovanni, although I wouldn't go with the sharpen first one like he suggests. Use the usm again and go right in between the first and second. That should do it. Good luck.

martin21



At 30.000 feet, the sun always shines !
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 18, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1914 times:

Thank you both. Will try again.


Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineRuudOnline From Netherlands, joined Feb 2006, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1914 times:

Looks soft indeed. I liked the first one better.

And sorry I called your Nikkor 80-400mm a less quality lens  ashamed 


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 20, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 1901 times:

Quoting RuudOnline (Reply 19):
sorry I called your Nikkor 80-400mm a less quality lens

That's ok! It's lesser quality than some other lenses!



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 21, posted (8 years 6 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1840 times:

Viv if you look at where the De icing boot meets with the wing on the bottom you can see some jaggies they are also highlighted due to the sharpening .
All the best with the rework



On a wing and a prayer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejection For Bad Info And Quality posted Sun Sep 3 2006 19:50:06 by Coninpa
Rejection For Soft - New Version Ok? posted Wed Aug 30 2006 11:00:07 by Coninpa
Rejection For 'Info'. posted Mon Jul 3 2006 17:51:52 by Viv
Rejection For Bad Quality posted Sun Apr 23 2006 12:48:02 by A388
Rejection For "Motive" posted Thu Apr 13 2006 09:13:24 by Coninpa
Rejection For Bad Centered, Need Help posted Tue Mar 7 2006 04:55:33 by A388
Angle Rejection For An Accepted Pic - Help posted Sun Feb 19 2006 06:09:38 by GoBoeing
Feedback On Rejection For Bad Quality posted Thu Mar 31 2005 15:47:20 by Fultod
Rejection For Blurry Pic? posted Sun Jun 30 2002 23:29:50 by Lewis
Looking For Help Concerning 'soft' Rejection posted Tue Dec 5 2006 19:23:01 by Maiznblu_757