Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Waddaya Think Of These Two?  
User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 3486 times:

I'd like to think these would make a nice (and welcome) addition to the database, but I'm interested as to what you all think before I bring my acceptance ratio down a few more notches...

http://www.nycaviation.com/hosting/8...sh8_N998HA_INFLIGHTgeardown_BF.jpg
http://www.nycaviation.com/hosting/8...sh8_N998HA_INFLIGHTgeardown_BF.jpg

And, for the record, this one is already sitting in the queue. Pull it or praise it?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ash8_N998HA_INFLIGHTsunrise_BF.jpg

Thanks,

Brian


What the FUTT?
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJAT74L From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 618 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3466 times:

Stunning.

The second of the two gear shots is best to my eye and the prop shot is out of this world.

It would be a loss if not accepted.

John



I like trains just as much as planes but trains don't like the Atlantic!
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3457 times:

Nice attempts but (my opinion) they fall short on quality. Too much noise and very low contrast...sorta has a hazy look to it like too much brightness has been applied. The tires should be black or very close to it. I like the 3rd shot but I forsee a badmotive. I would say try reworking or keeping them for the collection.

Mike


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3446 times:

Quoting JAT74L (Reply 1):
Stunning.

Thanks, John, I'm glad you like them!

Quoting Mikephotos (Reply 2):
Nice attempts but (my opinion) they fall short on quality. Too much noise and very low contrast...sorta has a hazy look to it like too much brightness has been applied. The tires should be black or very close to it. I like the 3rd shot but I forsee a badmotive. I would say try reworking or keeping them for the collection.

Hey Mike, nice to hear from you. I actually agree with your comments on the first two shots...definitely not top-quality and I suppose a bit soft (even blurry), but I did not apply much, if any brightness to the image. The exposures were on the order of 1-2 seconds, so that's probably where the hazyness came from.

I'm curious, though, as to what you see badmotive about the third shot. Any suggestions?

Brian



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 3437 times:

Maybe a hint of sharpening on the prop, other than that, OYE!!!!

The gear shots could stand some contrast though.


User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 3434 times:

Quoting Futterman (Reply 3):
I'm curious, though, as to what you see badmotive about the third shot. Any suggestions?

To me, the chopping of the top of the props seems to kill the shot. I know it is was probably impossible get more of it in the shot so you did you best.

Mike


User currently offlineJavibi From Spain, joined Oct 2004, 1371 posts, RR: 41
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3390 times:

Lovely shots!!!!

In the prop one try this and see if you like it better:
Layer>New Adjustment Layer>Selective color>Blacks>Black 5-10%

Cheers

j



"Be prepared to engage in constructive debate". Are YOU prepared?
User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 41
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3379 times:

Brian,

I fear that all these photos will be rejected for quality and motiv at least. Mike has already said the important issues for the first two.

I´d love the Prop shot, if it was centered and sharper, but i know that this will be extremely difficult, or even impossible to achive with the Dash 8.

regards,

Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineChrisH From Sweden, joined Jul 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3372 times:

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 7):
I´d love the Prop shot, if it was centered

How do you mean centered? I think the composition is bang on.


very nice shots, too bad about the noise... =(



what seems to be the officer, problem?
User currently offlineJavibi From Spain, joined Oct 2004, 1371 posts, RR: 41
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3369 times:

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 7):
it was centered and sharper

Allow me to disagree, IMHO composition is nice and well balanced, unlike the shots we all submit to comply with the stupid "center" rule. As for sharpness it is virtually impossible to get THAT kind of shot sharper than that.

It deserves to be in the DB if Brian edits it just a bit better, IMO that is, which counts as nothing, of course.

Cheers

j



"Be prepared to engage in constructive debate". Are YOU prepared?
User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 41
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3355 times:

Quoting Javibi (Reply 9):
Allow me to disagree



Quoting ChrisH (Reply 8):
I think the composition is bang on.

No, problem with your disagreement, i´d just say it would look nicer to my eyes, if the prop was a little bit lower in the frame. Almost all Attention is currently drawn to that dark upper left corner, which is dominating the shot. However that´s just my opinion.

Quoting Javibi (Reply 9):
It deserves to be in the DB if Brian edits it just a bit better



Quoting Javibi (Reply 9):
it is virtually impossible to get THAT kind of shot sharper than that.

I know, i know, trust me.... Smile However, if Brian is able to solve quality issues with some postprocessing it might have a chance.

At last, let me say i really like these kinds of shots, i appreciate that people try to push the envelope instead of uploading relatively "safe" shots.

Pushing that envelope however might harm your acceptance ratio, if you care about that...

Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3324 times:

SHIT...I was just writing a big huge reply, but hit the back button and lost it. Crap damn aw man! Stay tuned for my responses.

Thanks so far!

Brian



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3321 times:

Quoting Futterman (Reply 11):
SHIT...I was just writing a big huge reply, but hit the back button and lost it. Crap damn aw man! Stay tuned for my responses.

After a couple of those incidents I've started to (on long replies) select-all and copy before hitting the "Post" button...just to be safe.....

Mike


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3291 times:

Thanks again for all the replies so far. To have photographers of such a high caliber enjoy my photography really means a lot...all the exclamation marks put a smile on my face, too.  Wink

Now down to business.

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 4):
The gear shots could stand some contrast though.

While more contrast may liven up the colors a bit, it'll make the gear pitch black (silhouetted), defeating the purpose of the shot. They're just as bright and in-need-of-contrast in the original.

I will say, though, that watching the gear just about fall out of its compartment was freakin' awesome! Touchdown was even better, seeing the tires burn and struts compress...after we finished bouncing, there were even a few sparks in the brakes!

Quoting Mikephotos (Reply 5):
To me, the chopping of the top of the props seems to kill the shot. I know it is was probably impossible get more of it in the shot so you did you best.

I did manage to take a few vertical shots showing consideraby more of the prop (but not all of it). However, I feel they lack the 'oomph' the first image has, with the sun rising and city lights whizzing by. Judge for yourself:

http://www.nycaviation.com/hosting/8...essDash8_N998HA_INFLIGHTsunrise_BF

17mm, f4.0 at ISO800 and -1/3EV for a 4 second handheld exposure. You can clearly see how difficult it is to get it all in the frame...nearly impossible, in fact, to get it without some sort of reflection from the window (I don't even think the window is tall enough to SEE the whole prop!). Kinda like trying to get the whole engine in the frame when you take an over-the-wing shot out of an A320 or 737. Just won't work.

Quoting Javibi (Reply 6):
Lovely shots!!!!

In the prop one try this and see if you like it better:
Layer>New Adjustment Layer>Selective color>Blacks>Black 5-10%

Thanks, Javier! (Slow shutterspeeds rock!) I just gave this a try in PS and noticed nothing more than an ever-so-slight darkening of the image. However, I do like how it makes the colors more vibrant (a la Eric's suggestion to add more contrast). Planning to come back up to the Big Apple any time soon?

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 7):
I fear that all these photos will be rejected for quality and motiv at least. Mike has already said the important issues for the first two.

I´d love the Prop shot, if it was centered and sharper, but i know that this will be extremely difficult, or even impossible to achive with the Dash 8.

I'll disagree with you, just as the others have.

Quality: While I admit that the shots are neither grainless nor extraordinarily crisp, I've always been under the impression that screeners considered the artistic merit and photographic difficulty involved in taking out-of-the-box photos like this, effectively lowering the standards in the photographer's favor. Unfortunately, I've been disappointed as of late (see this badblurry rejection...any suggestions?). If you speak of my shots being rejected due to "quality" because the ISO grain has been accentuated by sharpening, then maybe I can fix that with another edit...but I can't fix the grain itself.

Motiv: I'll preface this with the usual I'm-not-bashing-the-photographers-and-I-love-the-screeners disclaimer. So...I'm not bashing the photographers and I love the screeners.

Now, if your only bone to pick with motiv is the "chopping of the top of the props" (which has been shown to be unavoidable), I'd like to show you these shots:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dustin J. Wywrot
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andras Sobester



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andras Sobester
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter Liander



Quoting Javibi (Reply 9):
Allow me to disagree, IMHO composition is nice and well balanced, unlike the shots we all submit to comply with the stupid "center" rule. As for sharpness it is virtually impossible to get THAT kind of shot sharper than that.

Thanks again, J. I don't think the centering here is anything too exceptional. Yes, I could have moved further back in the plane to fill more of the frame with the engine and prop, but that would have made the entire top third just black... As for sharpness, perhaps I can throw in a small hit of USM in certain places, but I really don't feel that it's necessary.

Quoting Javibi (Reply 9):
It deserves to be in the DB if Brian edits it just a bit better, IMO that is, which counts as nothing, of course.

I'm opened to any editing critique and suggestion. Your opinion, Javier, is nothing only to the photographer who doesn't push the envelope. Check your email.

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 10):
Almost all Attention is currently drawn to that dark upper left corner, which is dominating the shot. However that´s just my opinion.

Like I just stated in my reply to Javier's post, the entire top of the frame would be pitch-black if I had centered it the way you (appear to) describe.

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 10):
However, if Brian is able to solve quality issues with some postprocessing it might have a chance.

Again, I'd like to know what I could possibly do in terms of postprocessing to avoid these quality issues you are all speaking of. Is the grain the only hot topic? Or is there something else?

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 10):
At last, let me say i really like these kinds of shots, i appreciate that people try to push the envelope instead of uploading relatively "safe" shots.

Pushing that envelope however might harm your acceptance ratio, if you care about that...

Pushing the envelope my harm my acceptance ratio, but not pushing the envelope will harm me as a photographer. I'll keep uploading.

Quoting Mikephotos (Reply 12):
After a couple of those incidents I've started to (on long replies) select-all and copy before hitting the "Post" button...just to be safe.....

Not quite as idiot-proof as you'd think. I always do this (am doing it right now...Ctrl+A, Crtl+C, Crtl+V in Notepad...alright, back to typing), but it just so happened that I was C&P'ing something within the reply and accidentally hit the back button on the mouse, leaving only a few words - and not the whole reply - in my clipboard (who the hell puts a back button on the mouse?!). Anyway, as you can see, I just retyped it and it's all here...new and improved.

Thanks again, guys,

Brian



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3282 times:

Quoting Futterman (Reply 13):
I did manage to take a few vertical shots showing consideraby more of the prop (but not all of it). However, I feel they lack the 'oomph' the first image has, with the sun rising and city lights whizzing by. Judge for yourself:

http://www.nycaviation.com/hosting/8...se_BF

Agreed, the first example/composition is the better of the two. It's just a tough shot and might (my non-screener point of view) have 'motiv' issues.

Quoting Futterman (Reply 13):
Not quite as idiot-proof as you'd think.

It's idiot-proof, just not Futter-proof  Smile

Mike


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3272 times:

Quoting Mikephotos (Reply 14):
It's idiot-proof, just not Futter-proof  Smile

My last name begins with "F-U" for a reason, Mike.  Wink



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3251 times:

Quoting Futterman (Reply 15):
My last name begins with "F-U" for a reason, Mike.

F'in Ugly? Failing PhUtographer? Frustated Uploader? Hahahaha  Smile Just busting B@alls. Good luck with the image in the upload Q, let us know how it goes.

Mike


User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3233 times:

Touche! Hahaha...

Looking forward to seeing how the shot fairs in the queue...or am I?

Brian



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 41
Reply 18, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3210 times:

Hi again,

Quoting Futterman (Reply 13):
Pushing the envelope my harm my acceptance ratio, but not pushing the envelope will harm me as a photographer. I'll keep uploading.

Brian, that´s excactly what i meant to say: keep uploading, keep pushing the envelope

Quoting Futterman (Reply 13):
17mm, f4.0 at ISO800 and -1/3EV for a 4 second handheld exposure.

I´m still trying to figure out how many G&T i would need to get a hand steady enough for a 4 second exposure.  drunk 
That´s a nice shot!

Quoting Futterman (Reply 13):
I've always been under the impression that screeners considered the artistic merit and photographic difficulty involved in taking out-of-the-box photos like this, effectively lowering the standards in the photographer's favor.

That´s true, a new perspective, rare sights, difficult surroundings are taken into account for the favor of the photographer, but there are limits.

A difficult situation doesn´t guarantee an Acceptance.

Quoting Mikephotos (Reply 12):
Now, if your only bone to pick with motiv is the "chopping of the top of the props"

That´s not my bone to to pick, i just don´t really like it. And i´m not saying that it won´t get accepted, or that there are no other similar photos out there.
I was just giving you my own personal opinion.
Anyway, i´m more a jet guy, after all  Smile

To sum it up, please don´t be offended by what i said, it wasn´t meant to sound that way. I know your shots are hard to achive and i appreciate you are taking these kind of shots. If you choose to upload one of those, go ahead, i´ll be happy with you if it get´s accepted.

best regards,

Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 19, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3175 times:

Denis, just be careful with the quote tool. I (mikephotos) didn't say what you listed as me saying above.

Mike


User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 41
Reply 20, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3149 times:

Mike,
that´s strange. That quote was taken directly from Brians post. No idea why it shows your name and reply....


Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 44
Reply 21, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3142 times:

Quoting Mikephotos (Reply 19):
Mike,
that´s strange. That quote was taken directly from Brians post. No idea why it shows your name and reply....

I think it works like this he highlights what one person says and presses the quote from another reply hence the wrong name in the quote.
Its a simple mistake and could happen to anyone.
Sorry for this Mike I was just trying to show my point.
Mike did not say the above quote in my post.
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 41
Reply 22, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3140 times:

Ah, i see, nice to know...

Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 23, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3115 times:

no problem at all, just making sure you're aware for future use. no worries guys!

mike


User currently offlineJohnJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1690 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3110 times:

Neat shots, and riding mid-cabin in a Dash-8 is indeed a cool experience with the main landing gear extension/retraction sequence. The last few I've taken on US Airways Express, the windows have been so filthy you could barely see outside, much less get a decent picture.

User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Reply 25, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2992 times:

Well, the prop shot got badquality, badblurry, and badsoft. Triple threat!  Smile

Thanks again for all the comments.

Brian



What the FUTT?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Do You Think Of These DC-3 Shots? posted Tue Oct 24 2006 05:11:12 by San747
What Do You Think Of These Shots? posted Wed Jun 14 2006 00:41:33 by Airplanenut
What Do You Think Of These Snaps? posted Thu Jun 30 2005 16:50:01 by SignalOne
What Do You Think Of These Pics? posted Sun Jul 11 2004 20:24:18 by NWA742
Tell Me What You Think Of These Photos posted Sat Apr 17 2004 21:26:04 by A3204eva
What Do You Think Of These? Good Enough For A.net? posted Tue Apr 29 2003 01:41:14 by Benoit9999
What Do You Think Of These Pics? posted Tue Aug 6 2002 02:48:49 by Benoit9999
What Do You Think Of These Pics? posted Tue Jul 24 2001 00:49:07 by OH-LZA
Help With These Two Rejections posted Thu Nov 16 2006 21:11:41 by JoeIro
Any Of These A.net Worthy? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 11:18:26 by KBFIspotter