Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejected For Size, So Can I Reupload?  
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2393 times:

This just got size, so if I up it, will it get in now?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060309_c5pit.jpg


Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6814 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2391 times:

How big was the original?


wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2385 times:

Quoting Oly720man (Reply 1):
How big was the original?

1000x759



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineFlyfisher1976 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 804 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Quoting Cadet57 (Thread starter):
will it get in now?

Unfortunately, the quality of this photo is below what would probably be accepted here. Most folks upload their shots at 1024 x 683 (or something similar). Unless a shot is of exceptional quality, I wouldn't bother uploading any bigger than this.


User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 3):
Unfortunately, the quality of this photo is below what would probably be accepted here.

Then why was it not thrown for quality and just size? Im being sincere, It really does not make sense to me..



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2372 times:

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 4):
Then why was it not thrown for quality and just size? Im being sincere, It really does not make sense to me..

It's a one strike and your out ballgame. If the screener's were to list all the defects in a photo like that it would take quite a while. Once they have something that qualifies it as a reject, it's over. They have mentioned this probably 20 or 30 times that I remember reading.

As to the photo....the aspect ratio is wrong, it's almost square. The big glare spot is a killer. It does not appear level. It is not sharp, either you moved, or the focus was not on the right object.


User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6814 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2372 times:

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 4):
Then why was it not thrown for quality and just size? Im being sincere, It really does not make sense to me..

That's a screener question. You aren't the first to get a rejection then a different one after re-uploading.

I would assume bad quality was not given because the photo was obviously too small so there was no point in ticking any other boxes.

To me, too many of the instruments are blurred because the focus point is on the throttle warning plate, and there's too much flash reflection.

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 2):
1000x759

Odd size for the original. Was that out of the camera?



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2370 times:

Quoting Oly720man (Reply 6):
Odd size for the original. Was that out of the camera?

no, I cropped it a bit, as the Captains yolk was off center.



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejected For Quality - Can It Be Fixed? posted Wed Nov 2 2005 03:19:03 by Mr Spaceman
Rejected For Quality posted Tue Nov 21 2006 16:54:07 by Acontador
Would This Be Rejected For Motive? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 20:47:41 by San747
Accident Pic Rejected For "personal" posted Wed Sep 20 2006 23:44:05 by EZYAirbus
Rejected For Common, On First Visit? posted Sat Aug 12 2006 08:47:05 by EWS
Rejected For Being "to Close" ;-) posted Fri Aug 11 2006 21:16:13 by Maiznblu_757
Just Had The Rejected For "Blurry" posted Sun Jul 23 2006 22:16:34 by Cosec59
Rejected For Soft... Really? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 14:51:17 by Ptrjong
Argh! - Rejected For Being Common. posted Mon Jul 17 2006 18:49:02 by AirbusA346
Rejected For Contrast - Advice Requested posted Fri Jun 30 2006 15:58:22 by D L X