Both pics show EC-JDU and have been accepted on May 21, 2005. To me they look really the same and one pic shouldn't have made it in the database at mid 2005. A different thing would be the beginning but only 10 months ago the standards were against such doubles already. The photo-id is also only one digit away from the other.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks for "listening"
Georg
P.S.: I decided to post it here after I read this thread.
TransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2032 posts, RR: 11 Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2151 times:
It looks to me as if they are of two different landings, as it appears to be different times of day and different weather conditions (different runway even?).
I believe that, as they are the same plane but on different flights, the rule may not apply as strictly as if they were two pictures out of the same sequence.
I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
JumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2462 posts, RR: 50 Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2118 times:
Quoting TransIsland (Reply 2): I believe that, as they are the same plane but on different flights,
I wish someone would clarify this rule for everyone here .
I too am confused about this rule i have some great shots of the same planes that i already have in the database.
But i don't upload them because i have the same reg with the same motive in the Database already.
I'm not a big fan of uploading the same motive of the same reg over and over but a clear cut explanation would be nice.
Cheers
Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3144 posts, RR: 9 Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2062 times:
Quoting TransIsland (Reply 2): It looks to me as if they are of two different landings, as it appears to be different times of day and different weather conditions (different runway even?).
No, if you look closely you'll see a white line behind the plane. Definitely the same rwy. And I've been to LEJ last week. It's the same spot and rwy. If you know LEJ, you would know that it's almost impossible to have more than one Futura at one day.
Quoting JumboJim747 (Reply 3): I wish someone would clarify this rule for everyone here .
Yes, I got once one pic rejected for double which showed the right side of the plane while the accepted showed the left side...
Rotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1480 posts, RR: 18 Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2043 times:
Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 6): Nope. Would be better to mail the screeners about such issues. Not nice against the photographer to do it in public.
We are only saying that it is a double, not complaining about quality or whatever so I dont think the photog would have a problem with it, addiotional -even better: he gets extra exposure ...
anyway, would like to hear what screeners think, cause I ve found a lot more baddoubles ....
Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3144 posts, RR: 9 Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1998 times:
Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 6): Nope. Would be better to mail the screeners about such issues. Not nice against the photographer to do it in public.
Peter
So I should've mailed this issue to screeners@airliners.net ?
Sponsor Message: 
From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3144 posts, 
From India, joined May 2005, 450 posts, 
From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2032 posts, 
From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2462 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1480 posts, 
From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
