Johndm1957 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 141 posts, RR: 0 Posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2512 times:
Just wondering if there is an absolute limit to the number of pictures of a specific aircraft that would be accepted from a single Photog?
I'm aware of the common and quality rules as numbers in the DB rise (I've had plenty of rejects for those), but exceptional pictures will hopefully always make it on.
So how many do you have accepted of a single aircraft?
Ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3766 posts, RR: 20 Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2470 times:
Hi John,
I've got some baddouble rejections for uploading two shots of rare Indonesian airliners on rare airfields.
You've got nineteen shots accepted of this Spit - three shot on October 2, two on July 16, three on July 3, and so on. I've no problems with that as they are nice photos, but you really shouldn't be suprised to get rejections.
Peter
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
TransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2031 posts, RR: 11 Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2463 times:
I've had one common rejection so far: a side-on of a Virgin B744.
There's only one a/c that I have more than 2 pics of in the d/b, that's a Cessna 172. The scandalous thing is, they were all taken the same day! However, one is me standing on the ground while the plane is landing, the other two are window shots that are IMHO different enough to waive the baddouble rule...
Ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3766 posts, RR: 20 Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 2435 times:
Sorry, it seems I misread John's post - he isn't being surprised or complaining.
There are three airframes of which I have three shots on. In one of these cases, two shots were taken on the same day. It's not a take-off and a landing shot, so I guess I did qualify for baddouble.
Some great examples of doing very different things with the same aircraft. Don't forget also that the aircraft changed scheme, and that some rules have changed since acceptance (eg. the two "September 7, 2002" shots would be baddouble these days).
TZ
TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
Andz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8298 posts, RR: 11 Reply 12, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2174 times:
My point was the similarity of the pictures, look at the clouds, and the pole in front, it is obvious that both pictures were taken at the same time. In fact, isn't the left one badcentre?
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
Malandan From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 380 posts, RR: 16 Reply 13, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2166 times:
Sorry John, it's Bad Centre and my wife wants to know why people are allowed to put her name on their aircraft!
Seriously, great pictures, beats me with my measly two of this one.
What about a cockpit shot to complete the set?
Or join the in crowd and try the artistic direction along these lines
Johndm1957 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 141 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2152 times:
Hi Malcolm,
I purposely cropped this one with the wings not equal to the borders, I imagined a line through the centre of the fuselage to centre the aircraft....honest..
Cockpit and artsy shots coming, I've already had a few accepted like these,
And as I've just discovered that as a Photo Section Member at Old Warden, I'm allowed airside before the display, I might well soon be seen crawling around underneath those parked on the flightline!
Oh, strange name your wife has....how do you pronounce.. NNA?
Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3141 posts, RR: 9 Reply 15, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2130 times:
Quoting Andz (Reply 12): My point was the similarity of the pictures, look at the clouds, and the pole in front, it is obvious that both pictures were taken at the same time. In fact, isn't the left one badcentre?
Sorry, I missunderstood you. To me both look well centered...that can't be
Sponsor Message: 
From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 141 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3766 posts, 
From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2031 posts, 
From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2214 posts, 
From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3141 posts, 
From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8298 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
