DLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2366 times:
Quoting JayDavis (Thread starter): Please give me all the reasons for the photo being rejected?
NOA_Photo:
The photo shows a photo that does not exist. This could mean that you got lazy and decided not to upload anything, or that you decided to send something but then forgot to send it, then forgot that you forgot to send anything. In any case, there appears to be no photo here.
AirKas1 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2003, 3853 posts, RR: 57 Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2349 times:
Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 1): NOA_Photo:
The photo shows a photo that does not exist. This could mean that you got lazy and decided not to upload anything, or that you decided to send something but then forgot to send it, then forgot that you forgot to send anything. In any case, there appears to be no photo here.
JayDavis From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 17 Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2334 times:
I'm sorry, but to me, there is nothing worse than a "smart-ass" reply to an honest question. I did not realize that Comedy Central was having open auditions.
I also did not realize that after I appealed the shots, they would no longer be able to be linked to. So here are the two shots................hosted by another site.........
WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1288 posts, RR: 18 Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2321 times:
First, Eric was just attempting some light hearted humor. I thought it was funny. Second, the photos are really backlit, the sky is blown out, and all the levels look whacked. It would have been a sweet shot from the other side of the aircraft. I don't know if these can be saved, we'd have to see the originals.
-Matt
JayDavis From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 17 Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2318 times:
So, how do you change the backlevels?
There was no way to get on the other side of the runway, it was active.......
These are GREAT shots and if I can work on them in PS2 to meet the strict, severe, almost impossible guidelines of this site, I'd like to upload them.....
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 53 Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2292 times:
Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 15 Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2269 times:
Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 1): NOA_Photo:
The photo shows a photo that does not exist. This could mean that you got lazy and decided not to upload anything, or that you decided to send something but then forgot to send it, then forgot that you forgot to send anything. In any case, there appears to be no photo here
Sorry but you need to chill out a bit. That was very creative and alot of thought went into that!! Top points to DLKAPA!!!
But to the subject at hand, they are backlit, which is a problem. The shots are quite good actually, but the backlit problem will not help them nor will the softness.
JayDavis From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 17 Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2221 times:
I'm having somebody help me with the backlit problem.
No, I didn't take any taxiing shots of the 747. We were already positioned
at the end of the runway. It was a crap shoot more or less, you either
got the view I have with the rotation right in front of you, or you could have gone with Tim and shot as the bird got higher into the sky with no backlighting whatsoever. We just weren't able to get on the other side of this runway as it is an active taxiiway.