Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Another Rejection...  
User currently offlineGlapira From Spain, joined Feb 2005, 186 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Hello everybody! Just got this rejections this morning, together with some more acceptances thanks to god.

Bad Contrast

http://www.airliners.net/uf/view.fil...8285&filename=1143968782LBSEHn.jpg

Bad Level

http://www.airliners.net/uf/view.fil...8285&filename=1143968870s4XGUE.jpg


Kind Regards, Radial360
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMygind66 From Spain, joined May 2004, 1058 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Good morning Giorgio...

About the Iberia I don't think is a contrast problem..white is white and black is black but there are some parts overexposed ( wings and fuselage...). If you could reduce exposure in bright parts perhaps the result would be satisfactory enough for an acceptance..

The AA is a hard one.. The position, high over the a/c and the short lens you have used for sure, gives a very subjective decision about what is level or not..

Hope that helps....

Enrique


User currently offlineLinco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1380 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Hi Giorgio,

Nice shots. I'm with Enrique on the first one, overexposure on parts. The second I really like, it doesnt seem unlevel to me. Shame it got rejected, i'd have given it a hit!

Regards
Colin  Smile


User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Glapira have a look at the levels in what ever editing program you are using.
You will see a big "spike" on the right(highlights) side indicating a exposure problem on both of them.

If you rotate the AA somewhere between 2 and 3 degrees ccw it looks more pleasant for the eye but there is also a strange spot(like a flare) in front of engine 2 and you are still left with the exposure problem.

I don't see a rescue possibility for both.

Willem



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineGlapira From Spain, joined Feb 2005, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2372 times:

Thank you guys! Well I though exactly the same.. how is it possible the first one got rejected for bad contrast and not bad exposure... but...this is A.net  Smile

And about the second, the editing is from Paul, who rotated according to the car just on the top left. He also kept in mind the distortion of the 18mm, so the result was quite nice, and I was really surprised it got rejected Sad. Any screener comment? Also Johann rejected them both, for the exact same reasons screeners did.

Thanks guys for you time and help! Will see what I can do.



Kind Regards, Radial360
User currently offlineJavibi From Spain, joined Oct 2004, 1371 posts, RR: 41
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2368 times:

Quoting Glapira (Reply 4):
how is it possible the first one got rejected for bad contrast and not bad exposure

Why did you upload it if you knew it, I wonder?  Wink You overexpose all the shots you take from that position, remember to underexpose some next time (you might use RAW as a safety net as well).

Regards

j



"Be prepared to engage in constructive debate". Are YOU prepared?
User currently offlineGlapira From Spain, joined Feb 2005, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2363 times:

Hey Javi, yes.. you are right! Next week it will be different  Wink I promise... Anyways the light was very strange this day... very early in the morning, and firs time I shooted at this time.


Kind Regards, Radial360
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2363 times:

The Iberia is a bit overexposed, and the AA is OK.

KS/codeshare

edit: typo

[Edited 2006-04-02 15:33:05]


How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offlinePhilhyde From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 678 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2363 times:

Quoting Glapira (Reply 4):
And about the second, the editing is from Paul, who rotated according to the car just on the top left. He also kept in mind the distortion of the 18mm, so the result was quite nice, and I was really surprised it got rejected Sad. Any screener comment? Also Johann rejected them both, for the exact same reasons screeners did.

The badlevel is most likely due to the line on the tarmac at the top of the photo. It looks to me like that line is curved due to the lens, so you may just be out of luck on that one.

Nice photos though, and that shooting perspective is very advantagegous.

cheers,
Phil



HoustonSpotters Admin - Canon junkie - Aviation Nut
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Another Rejection... posted Sun Apr 2 2006 11:10:00 by Glapira
Another Rejection - Advice Please posted Mon Jul 18 2005 23:00:58 by TWAMD-80
Another Rejection (badinfo/angle) Thread posted Thu Jun 2 2005 04:36:41 by Senorcarnival
Another Rejection Question posted Fri May 13 2005 22:31:43 by BRAVO7E7
Yet Another Rejection -badcameraangle Question posted Sun May 8 2005 09:01:03 by StealthZ
Another Rejection Help Thread... posted Sat Apr 24 2004 06:11:09 by Q330
Yet Another Rejection Help Post... posted Wed Oct 8 2003 04:04:30 by Airbus Lover
Another Rejection Question posted Sat Feb 22 2003 21:28:53 by Tpk
Another Rejection posted Thu Jul 18 2002 08:27:14 by Paulc
Another Rejection Question posted Sat Jul 28 2001 11:43:40 by VH-MDK