KFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3263 posts, RR: 33 Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4924 times:
Pepef From Finland, joined Oct 2002, 440 posts, RR: 10 Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4831 times:
I used to be able to get 1 accepted photo per flight, nowadays none. They're too similar. These 4 are from the same flight (3 rejected, didn't even try the 4th).
Skywatch From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 923 posts, RR: 5 Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4812 times:
Here is my favorite...I haven't tried fixing it up and putting it back in yet, but I think it might stand a chance: http://myaviation.net/?pid=00493491
Vzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 820 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 4794 times:
This "bad_motiv" is from 1981 in the skies over West Germany:
A pair of Bitburg "Zulu Alert" F-15s chalk up the sky as they run intercepts on each other. Seen from the cockpit of the E-3A AWACS that was controlling the fighters.
"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
IL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2235 posts, RR: 51 Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4689 times:
I never uploaded it, as I cloned out a very annoying lamppost (I should have walked a bit to the left or right to avoid it). But who cares?!? A 30x45cm print is hanging nicely framed in my house. No sign of the lamppost. hehe...
SkyWestFan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 179 posts, RR: 5 Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4661 times:
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9459 posts, RR: 72 Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4533 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Had this one rejected for NOA_centered. A bit baffling, but I have since recropped it and reuploaded it.
Hopefully it will get on, I don't know the next time I will be able to shoot the first flight of the Boeing 777-200 LR, especially from the roof of the Boeing hangar.
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9459 posts, RR: 72 Reply 23, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4523 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Haha thats because I only uploaded half the plane
Just kidding, maybe the photo is too big for the forums?
JumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2462 posts, RR: 50 Reply 24, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4507 times:
Hey Royal looks nice but who am i to tell a screener what right and whats wrong .
But in saying that i can see why it was rejected for centre as its a little low in the frame.
Cracking shot and hope it makes it after you resubmit.
Cheers
26 Futterman: Florian...wow... Here're a few from my end: BadMotiv BadBlurry Brian
27 QantasA332: Bad motiv, or distance, or centre, or some combination thereof. I was a bit disappointed seeing as there are some other great photos in the db whose a
28 Viv: This one. http://myaviation.net/search/photo_search.php?id=00390590
29 Skidmarks: Only one I can think of to share this exalted thread would be this which is in the "reject" site Andy [Edited 2006-04-07 10:23:40]
30 Skidmarks: Well, that didn't work I'll try again from my home PC. Andy
31 Propfreak: hi all, also have one which didn't make it here (quality i think was the issue..) http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=300061 hope you like it
32 Administrator: Those are all excellent shots and I find it very strange to hear that they were rejected. Could you please email me the registrations and other info
33 Danny: The Dash 8 shot by Florian is stunning. Shame to see it rejected.
34 PUnmuth@VIE: The same goes for the Lauda with the reflected mountains is also a great photo. Glad to see that Johan is taking care of this.
36 Pepef: It's propably just a plot to make me write something nice. I'm not falling for it. -Pepef-
37 Ptrjong: A joke I hope. This is one I regret. Rejected not for motive but quality. http://www.logmonster.com/images/ful...=D-HHTS-1ptr_1136315480-1-4231.jpg P
38 Pepef: Of course it's a joke. That's why the smilie is there. -Pepef-
39 N949WP: Well, here are a few that sadly didn't make it. What's even sadder was that some of the rejection comments really made me think that creativity is not
40 Ptrjong: HKG, that surrounded 747 is a fantastic shot! Sorry Pepef.
41 DerekF: My favorites that didn't get past the "quality" hurdle were these two snap shots. First a now rare C-141 passes the moon and this German F-4F blasts o
43 Jspitfire: Here's a couple of mine. One of Conair's Air Tractors in Abbotsford, Rejected for bad centered. Didn't even try uploading this one of the feathered pr
49 SoBe: Never made it but I still love this shot. [Edited 2006-04-08 16:27:38]
50 Christeljs: Hmm I wish this page would load properly and stop cropping everyone's photos!
51 JeffM: Wouldn't be a problem if they just upload at 650 wide or less.
52 Spencer: I was a little disappointed about this one not making it, however it made a nice print. http://www.airliners.net/uf/536884509/11445116946w3I4H.jpg Spe
53 Edoca: Ben, that's a very interesting shot! Was it rejected for motive or did you not bother to upload it?
54 JayDavis: N949WP, The Cargolux shot is FANTASTIC and I truly see nothing wrong with the wonderful shot you took of the B-777 in house colors. I know I "might" b
55 Fiveholer: Sponsored by the flavor of the month....quality. Danny[Edited 2006-04-09 04:13:48]
56 LGW: Edoca, Thanks, I did upload it but from memory it god 'bad motiv', shame as I thought it was pretty cool but as this thread has proved, there are a to
57 Walter2222: Hi there, This one had "motive" as rejection criteria: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...BRD_EBFN_20050902_IMG_2398_WVB.jpg ... I was just trying
58 Jcf5002: I love this pic, but never tried uploading it in an edited format. Too many no-nos and it'll surely get rejected: E.g. backlit, slightly soft (I guess
59 Javibi: I am still looking for my jaw that dropped when I saw those Cargolux and China shots!!!! Impressive!! Some of my own: More can be found here: http://
60 Birdy: I don't really remember reason why it was rejected Cheers, Greg
61 TRVYYZ: This one http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=252651
62 Cosmic: Rejected due to Quality. Still, an interesting Photo which I like! Cosmic
63 Maiznblu_757: Rejected for soft/blurry and then dark the 2nd upload.
66 KLGAviation: I was pretty upset about these rejections because it showed me that artistic shots aren't appreciated anymore... aviation photography is becoming avia
67 SkyWestFan: I think your statement hit it right on the head!!! I couldnt have said it better. PS. Peter...that shot makes my heart flutter. It would have been an
69 ChrisZRH: what a nice topic! just awesome what some people get to capture... and sad they wount make it onto a.net here are three of my latest, maybe i'll try s
70 Maiznblu_757: That Thai MD11 would have been awesome... If it wasnt for the fence. [Edited 2006-04-16 23:03:32]
71 BritPilot777: http://myaviation.net/search/photo_search.php?id=00543356&size=large Rejected for bad quality, as am AMATEUR photographer using my Nikon Coolpix Camer
72 BrianW999: KGL, I don't care what Anet think, that clouds shot is one of the moodiest aviation pictures I have ever seen. I would be proud to have that as a wall
73 Aviopic: For some unknown reason this was rejected Dam...... screeners
76 Corey07850: I took this picture at the NBAA show in Orlando of the new Dassault Falcon 7x... It would've been the first picture of this reg in the database (and s
78 Fiveholer: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ons/big/20060319_N638USLAXCity.jpg Danny
79 JayDavis: I'd really like to ask the screeners, as a panel, if possible, just what the heck is wrong with so many of these shots. That is why I get so upset wit
81 Yanqui67: Some recent ones for me. The 777 for quality, the other three for contrast. Oh well.[Edited 2006-04-20 20:32:18]
82 Miamiair: Here's my contribution: [Edited 2006-04-20 21:02:07]
83 Aero145: Hi everybody! Here is one of my rejections, rejected for quality: It was taken in February 2006, and is really deticated to Paul Markman. He gave me t
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 179 posts, 
(but in hindsight, accurate.)
From Australia, joined Aug 2001, 1451 posts, 
From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1122 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1394 posts, 
From Finland, joined Oct 2002, 440 posts, 
From Germany, joined May 2004, 540 posts, 
a pity, but life goes on.
From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, 
From Cuba, joined Jul 2002, 2441 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2235 posts, 
From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, 
From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 582 posts, 
From South Africa, joined Sep 2003, 1883 posts, 
From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 687 posts, 
From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
){kind=link}