Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Quality...really?  
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1692 times:

I just don't see it.

Suggestions?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ename=20060407_74-0665FSM32506.jpg

Danny


Bring back Bethune!
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1691 times:

It does look a bit flat (and soft at the top of the cockpit).

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1674 times:

Fire the B*stard that rejected that! (j/k....i'm partial to Phantoms....)

Nice image, excellent subject.


User currently offlineFL350 From Belgium, joined Feb 2003, 517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

There are some guys in training I heard....

Maybe an appeal

Fabrice



Fabrice Sanchez - Brussels Aviation Photography
User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1293 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1650 times:

Hi Danny,

I like that shot of the Phantom too. If I really do my best for finding any flaws, it would be around the numbering on the nose-gear part (right side), but - for me - it does not distract from the shiny nose! I hope that the screener who rejected this shot can give you some advise on what the real quality issue is and I do hope that you can get it in with a minor adaptation!

PS: The last time I saw this version - if I am correct, it's the one with "TISEO" integrated in the left wing - was in the seventies when similar aircraft were operating from Soesterberg AFB in The Netherlands. I still must have some slides "somewhere" from that period, but these certainly would not be in such a shiny condition (I had the Canon A1, but with FD-lenses, so without autofocus...  Sad ).

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineLinco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1380 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1643 times:

Cracking shot Danny, really nice motive and that nose is really shiny and smooth. I'd appeal it

Regards
Colin  Smile


User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1629 times:

Great image Danny!

I know the F4 is quite a big plane but if you look at it from this side, it looks very elegant and slim. I think I would hit that appeal button as well.

Roel.



Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1622 times:

Guys, I was thinking the same, appeal. I wanted to gather some thoughts first. I personally don't see anything wrong with is as is the general consensus here. I'll wait for an offical reply maybe before doing anything. As my acceptance rate has gone from 86% down to 66% in a week's time!  Confused

Thanks,
Danny



Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 42
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1615 times:

Danny,
you can always use the appeal function, when in doubt.
Photos looks good to me. But whats up with that thin line at the right bottom?
Looks a bit weird...

regards,

Denis



That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
User currently offlineZSOFN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1413 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1609 times:

Quoting Beechcraft (Reply 8):
But whats up with that thin line at the right bottom?

Looks like a shadow of some equipment to me... If, hypothetically, Danny was to clone that out for the sake of getting it uploaded, would there be a problem in this case as it's so small?


User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1602 times:

I will appeal it I guess. As for that line, ZSOFN is correct. It is the shadow of a ladder. They were all over the place. Thanks everyone.

Danny



Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1566 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Fiveholer (Thread starter):
I just don't see it.

Me neither, Danny - literally. Unfortunately the link is gone, which is very frustrating.

Given the debate above - and particularly Jeff's comment  wink  - I would have liked to see the subject of the conversation.

Let us know the outcome.

Cheers.

Paul


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1531 times:

Quoting Psych (Reply 11):
Given the debate above - and particularly Jeff's comment - I would have liked to see the subject of the conversation.

LOL Paul, mine was strictly in jest, I think the screeners do an admirable job, thankless as it may be. I would hope it was an error on that photo, but as I mentioned, I'm very phond of phantoms...


User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 13, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1468 times:

Wow....well....rejected on the appeal with no reason rather than quality. Shame really...some kind of explanation from higher ups would be nice. Here it is hosted externally so those who tried the broken link can see.

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=124953354&size=o

Danny  Sad



Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineFly747 From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1497 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1466 times:

Wow, unbelievable clarity. What a beaut. I don't see the NOA_quality either. Thanks for providing another link because I didn't get to see it first time around. You know whose loss it is that it didn't get accepted...

Ivan

[Edited 2006-04-08 05:04:17]


Contrails Aviation Photography
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 15, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1451 times:

Great shot Danny. I love the refection on the nose...
I should add that Im a Phantom Phan as well. Not quite a seasoned as Jeff though..  Wink


User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1293 posts, RR: 28
Reply 16, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1379 times:

Quoting Fiveholer (Reply 13):
Wow....well....rejected on the appeal with no reason rather than quality.

Hi Danny,

Sorry to see that the appeal was rejected  Sad Did you change something to your original image before the appeal?


Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1371 times:

Nope, left it as it was. A personal message on the appeal would have been nice. So it was known exactly what was "bad" about it.

Danny



Bring back Bethune!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Are This Pictures Really Bad Quality? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 04:27:29 by XAAPB
Opinions On Quality After Revised Workflow posted Tue Dec 12 2006 09:22:09 by LOCsta
Incorrect Missing Info? & Quality Rejection Help. posted Mon Dec 11 2006 20:24:25 by Pride
My Quality Rejections - Please Help posted Mon Dec 11 2006 20:24:22 by Lanas
Quality Blurry Soft Oversharpened? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 11:58:07 by Andrei
Quality Reject - Can It Be Saved? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 00:11:46 by Walter2222
Really Badcentered? posted Sun Dec 3 2006 18:26:19 by APT
Perplexed By A Quality Reject posted Sat Dec 2 2006 23:53:32 by San747
Is It Really Badcentered? posted Thu Nov 30 2006 23:47:20 by Dazed767
Quality Soft/Oversharpened? posted Thu Nov 30 2006 16:38:08 by Alibo5NGN