Screener6 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2662 times:
I have to agree with CYKA, the fence in the foreground is a big distraction and greatly degrades the overall quality of the photo. If the fence was not there, it would be a great shot. The quality of the scan looks good. I would pass this photo on to Johan, but I have a feeling he would probably end up rejecting it. If it was a shot of very rare aircraft, the fence would not really be a big problem.
Ckw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 779 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2642 times:
Agreed, the nose isn't sharp - which is a shame as the rest of the aircraft is spot on! Personally I don't mind pics where the nose is sharp and the rest of the aircraft a blur, but if the cockpit area is even a little off, I don't like it - it's like eyes in portraits. The fence I don't mind as its not obscuring the aircraft in any way (though ideally it would be better without).
Ivailo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2603 times:
the photo is pretty good (seems very real) and it would be shame not to be added to the database ! there are pics which are worse than this one and are still added daily - why shouldn't that pic be added too...
anyways the nose is a little blurry, but the fence is just nothing because it doesn't affect the aircraft at all.