Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1732 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3386 times:
A very unusual composition that is slightly spoiled for me by the missing tail-cone, Included it might just have brought the tailplanes onto the top corners which would have made this strong, symmetrical composition even stronger.
I have not got a clue what the screeners would make of it though.
LIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 850 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3367 times:
Mario, great shot !! I personally tend to appreciate this kind of approach insome cases : it lets you see things ina different way and for this is much more original. I do not think yours could be part of the A.net database, but must repeat the yours is really a great, great shot. I have tons like this at home trying uncover a differents spot on a plane, or a different view on it. Keep this good work going.
LH526 From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 2439 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3056 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW FORUM MODERATOR
Thanks to everyone for their comments ... its still in the queu, so we'll see what the screeners opinion is on such kind of photo or if there preference is more on everyday shots.
Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 1): Included it might just have brought the tailplanes onto the top corners which would have made this strong, symmetrical composition even stronger.
Thats all my 17-35mm 2.8 lens allowed, However, I imagine such a photo to be little more boring that the one above as it suffers that incostistency from "cut off fuselage and full (not cut off) tail" So everything is cut off and that's where the balance rests (IMHO)
Trittst im Morgenrot daher, seh ich dich im Strahlenmeer ...