Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 II Lens  
User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 18
Posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4786 times:

Hello guys,

I am thinking of buying this lens soon. Can anybody of you guys that have this lens tell me your opinion about it? I've seen opinions on the net, but it's very nice to get some real-life opinions...

It's not so expensive here in Iceland, about 105$ U.S.A., so I don't think it'll be a loss to buy it. It's also a prime, and I shoot most often f9-f16, so sharpness will un-likely be a problem.

Thank you!
David

[Edited 2006-04-21 00:57:56]

[Edited 2006-04-21 00:59:07]

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGVerbeeck From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 245 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4776 times:

Great lens optically and a must have I think... Arguably the best value for money in the Canon lineup. I used to have one but it died on me; build quality is its only drawback. The f/1.4 is a better lens in all respects, but is it worth the bucks?

Quoting Aero145 (Thread starter):
It's also a prime, and I shoot most often f9-f16, so sharpness will un-likely be a problem.

Performance will peak at f/4 - f/5.6; at f/8 it (already) starts to suffer from diffraction. You don't buy an available-light lens to shoot it at f/16 right?  Wink

Giovanni

[Edited 2006-04-21 01:11:06]

User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4770 times:

Quoting GVerbeeck (Reply 1):
Great lens optically and a must have I think... Arguably the best value for money in the Canon lineup. I used to have one but it died on me; build quality is its only drawback. The f/1.4 is a better lens in all respects, but is it worth the bucks?

Quoting Aero145 (Thread starter):
It's also a prime, and I shoot most often f9-f16, so sharpness will un-likely be a problem.

Performance will peak at f/4 - f/5.6; at f/8 it (already) starts to suffer from diffraction. You don't buy an available-light lens to shoot it at f/16 right? Wink

Giovanni

[Edited 2006-04-21 01:11:06]

Hi there.

Well, if the lens is not good at small apartures (high numbers) then I'll not buy it. I want sharp photos, and I want a pretty cheap prime. Build quality of lens is not important for me.

So, what do you think? For photos of aircraft, maybe good enough for A.net ( Smile), is this lens what I should go for?

Thanks!
David


User currently offlineEDDL From Germany, joined Dec 2002, 738 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4760 times:

Some 100% crops for you ... no scientific research, just some random shots in dull weather.



Phil / EDDL


User currently offlineGVerbeeck From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 245 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4760 times:

Quoting Aero145 (Reply 2):
Well, if the lens is not good at small apartures (high numbers) then I'll not buy it. I want sharp photos, and I want a pretty cheap prime. Build quality of lens is not important for me.

Relatively speaking, that is. It'll easily outperform (consumer) zooms sharpness-wise at any aperture, don't worry. I just mentioned that the sweet spot is f/4 'till f/8, afterwards, quality drops, just like it drops on any lens (although some zooms peak at f/11)  Smile.

If the range is right (50mm), yes, this is a great lens, not only for A.net I hope?  Wink

Take care,
Giovanni


User currently offlineAsgeirs From Iceland, joined May 2001, 516 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4760 times:

Quoting GVerbeeck (Reply 1):
Performance will peak at f/4 - f/5.6; at f/8 it (already) starts to suffer from diffraction. You don't buy an available-light lens to shoot it at f/16 right?

Does the f/1.4 lens give better results than the f/1.8 above f/4 - f/5.6, let's say at f/11 or thereabout?



Reykjavik Aviation Photography - Just bring the aircraft to us and we'll photograph them! :-)
User currently offlineEDDL From Germany, joined Dec 2002, 738 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4758 times:

Quoting Asgeirs (Reply 5):
Does the f/1.4 lens give better results than the f/1.8 above f/4 - f/5.6, let's say at f/11 or thereabout?

Don't think so, but AF performance will be much better. Haven't used the 1.4 version though.

Phil / EDDL


User currently offlineGVerbeeck From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 245 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4745 times:

Didn't test the two against eachother, but they should be more or less the same. Optical quality is very similar, although most tests on the net give the 1.4 a slight edge at wide apertures (which was to be expected).

http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_50_14/mtf.gif

vs.

http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_50_18/mtf50.gif


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4743 times:

Quoting GVerbeeck (Reply 4):
Quoting Aero145 (Reply 2):
Well, if the lens is not good at small apartures (high numbers) then I'll not buy it. I want sharp photos, and I want a pretty cheap prime. Build quality of lens is not important for me.

Relatively speaking, that is. It'll easily outperform (consumer) zooms sharpness-wise at any aperture, don't worry. I just mentioned that the sweet spot is f/4 'till f/8, afterwards, quality drops, just like it drops on any lens (although some zooms peak at f/11) Smile.

If the range is right (50mm), yes, this is a great lens, not only for A.net I hope? Wink

Take care,
Giovanni

Thanks Giovanni.

Maybe I should just buy it and see how it works. I do never at least buy a lens ONLY for A.net.  Smile

Regards,
David

PS: Phil, thank you very much for the crops. They're pretty good!


User currently offlineWhyWhyZed From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 914 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 4721 times:

I have this lens in my bag. I have yet to use it for Aviation photos, but for non-aviation the results are great for the price. So many owners say that it should be considered L, and I think I agree.

Gotta love the bokeh!  Wink

- Jason DePodesta


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4709 times:

This is probably the one of my lenses that I use the least. It's sharp, but it's a bit on the long side on a 1.6 crop camera. Never used it for aviation.

User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1690 posts, RR: 62
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4708 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

David
It is within the range covered by your zoom and unless you need the low light facility which is negated by your desire to use it at small apertures, save your money.

Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineAero145 From Iceland, joined Jan 2005, 3071 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4707 times:

Hi guys.

Thanks for the replies, I will get myself a new zoomlens later then.  Smile

Regards,
David


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Canon EF 70-200mm F/4L USM posted Mon Jul 3 2006 03:35:04 by Aero145
The Canon EF 70-200mm 1:4L USM posted Mon Apr 17 2006 00:57:27 by Flyingzacko
Question About Canon EF-S 18-55 Lens posted Tue Mar 7 2006 15:02:55 by Jorge1812
How Many People Are Using The Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6 L? posted Wed Mar 9 2005 09:50:29 by Sean377
Canon EF 2x II Question posted Mon Dec 20 2004 13:07:17 by F70173
Opinions On The Canon 28-300 L Is Lens posted Fri Jun 25 2004 11:46:36 by Paulianer
Canon EF 1.4x II Extender Or 2x? posted Fri Mar 26 2004 22:08:26 by Dazed767
Canon EF 75 300 Lens posted Wed Feb 11 2004 05:28:01 by Ryan h
Thoughts About The Canon EF 28-135? posted Sun Nov 16 2003 09:41:55 by Airways
Anyone Using The Canon EF 100-400mm F/4.5-5.6L Is? posted Sun Jul 13 2003 22:13:52 by Brick