KLGAviation From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 243 posts, RR: 4 Posted (7 years 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1732 times:
Guys,
I am aware this photo isn't good quality. I'm aware that the aircraft has motion blur. I'm aware that the horizon curves. But my question is, would this photo make it?
The answer is obviously no for so many reasons, but I wonder, wouldn't many people enjoy this photograph more your standard side-on shot?
Let me know. Agree with me, grill me with questions, castrate me, I don't mind. But trust me, it is NOT my intention to make this turn into an Airliners.net bashing session so please don't go there.
Chris
There is a fine line between a picture and a photo. The latter seems to be disappearing.
KLGAviation From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 243 posts, RR: 4 Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1673 times:
Ah, thanks, and believe me, I know it's not close to A.net standards. The reason for my post was simply to be thought-provoking.
I wish there was some way that unconventional shots could get their own section or something, however the more I think about it the more far-fetched my own ideals seem!
Chris
There is a fine line between a picture and a photo. The latter seems to be disappearing.
9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1657 times:
Chris,
Photo's like that are important to the individual concerned and no-one else (unless it's news worthy). It's what I call a camera phone shot. These type of shots capture the moment as it is.
Quoting KLGAviation (Thread starter): wouldn't many people enjoy this photograph more your standard side-on shot?
No because the aircraft in your shot is barely recognisable.
Glennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 56 Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1544 times:
Quoting Javibi (Reply 5): Probably, but those people have no say here at A.net.
Javier... I'd prefer a bit more positivity from you
We listen, but Javier is right when he says:
Quoting Javibi (Reply 5): Could it be done better? Has it been done better?
If it's a brilliant shot and motivation and quality supports the shot, then it will be accepted. Unfortunately it's MUCH HARDER to get these kind of shots right. But you already know this in practice
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...