Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rejected For Motiv  
User currently offlineSingel09 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 151 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1985 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Guys

I am trying hard to get more then 4 photo's uploaded on A.Net ... not so much luck, but not giving up.

The next shot to me seemed a good option for getting uploaded.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...big/20060407_mteerdsbusyappron.jpg

Rejected for motiv. How would you guys rate it, be frank,be hard, here to learn!!

Mause

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMorvious From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 707 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1979 times:

I like this shot, and I think the motive was okay with it, but maybe not anet stuff, I don't know.

Maybe the motive has something to do with the angle used and the crop of the plane. If you could have shown more of the first plane (Nice Fokker but) instead of cropping the left wing out.

Cheers

Stefan van Hierden



have a good day, Stefan van Hierden
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1957 times:

That won't work Mause.
The position of the sun is not optimal, to much clutter and I see a big dust spot right from the near light post.
Nice Fokker's though.

Willem

edit:typo

[Edited 2006-04-22 23:18:24]


The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1196 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1950 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hi Mause,

Quoting Aviopic (Reply 2):
much clutter

I agree with Willem, and also find another dust spot right above the tail of plane, about 1 cm below the upper border of this image. Still a nice shot!

_Hongyin_

[Edited 2006-04-22 23:14:45]

User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1899 times:

Quoting Singel09 (Thread starter):
be frank,be hard, here to learn!!

Well good to make mistakes early in the piece.

I would reject:

* Motiv
* Centre
* Possibly even angle

Try first with simple easy shots. Also try reducing the resolution to max 1200 width. The higher the resolution, the greater the chance that flaws in the shot will show. I recommend a resolution of 1024x663 or 1200x800 (for DSLR/35mm 3:2 ratio).

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineSingel09 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 151 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1871 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks all for the feedback!! Will start simple and learn!

Mause


User currently offlineAzza40 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 1052 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1856 times:

would the motiv be all the ground verhiles?

Aaron  sly 



Not been on here for a good 2/3 years!
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1807 times:

Will archive this thread as I believe it has been answered.

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rejected For Quality posted Tue Nov 21 2006 16:54:07 by Acontador
Would This Be Rejected For Motive? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 20:47:41 by San747
Accident Pic Rejected For "personal" posted Wed Sep 20 2006 23:44:05 by EZYAirbus
Rejected For Common, On First Visit? posted Sat Aug 12 2006 08:47:05 by EWS
Rejected For Being "to Close" ;-) posted Fri Aug 11 2006 21:16:13 by Maiznblu_757
Just Had The Rejected For "Blurry" posted Sun Jul 23 2006 22:16:34 by Cosec59
Rejected For Soft... Really? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 14:51:17 by Ptrjong
Argh! - Rejected For Being Common. posted Mon Jul 17 2006 18:49:02 by AirbusA346
Rejected For Contrast - Advice Requested posted Fri Jun 30 2006 15:58:22 by D L X
Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please posted Sun Jun 11 2006 00:20:13 by Psych