Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1605 posts, RR: 64 Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1981 times:
Doing things differently is not always good, it can be, but isn't on the top photo. The angle is uninteresting and the nosewheel off to the left is chopped in half. the image is either grossly undersharpened or slightly out of focus to my eye.
N0 2 the contrast and saturation is too high and the image is oversharpened a touch
The nose needed to be nearer the right side of the frame which would have also removed the distracting light object on the right edge. The motive is the Hanghai logo chopped in half. The personal means that the screener sent you a message, but you did not apparently scroll down to read it. Rejections for recognisable persons are people
N0 4 is a lovely image and I really like it. It is a bit soft and could also be rejected for distance or centreing, though I like it as it is. You do seem to have a distracting hot pixel, or perhaps a few, in the smoke that should be cloned out if resubmitting
Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1605 posts, RR: 64 Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1945 times:
Quoting Lufthansi (Reply 2): That is a landing plane there. Sure I can clone it but that's reality...
I guess that is rather like the distant bird that looks like a dust spot, better to be removed than taken as such. I would be inclined to remove it as if I thought it was a hot pixel, others could easily do the same.
Airportmanager From Ecuador, joined Mar 2001, 558 posts, RR: 3 Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1830 times:
Ive also noticed many good shots of mine being rejected, MANY here. And just when my acceptance rate was betteer. Its really many times, sad to get confiramtion emails because so many pics I want to share with the rest of the people, are rejected.A bit dis-ilusioning. I like a.net, but so many good ones down the drain. Maybe more screeners should come in? that way, all the photos in the qeue can be viewed in a more detailed way, and not rush through them. therefore the qeue moves on.
Willo From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 1352 posts, RR: 14 Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1771 times:
Quoting Airportmanager (Reply 4): Maybe more screeners should come in? that way, all the photos in the qeue can be viewed in a more detailed way, and not rush through them. therefore the qeue moves on.
If the fault is there, the fault is there - it won't matter how many people screen the picture or how detailed a look is given, the result will be the same: rejection.
There's one thing that anet can't be accused of, and that is rushing through the queue
Lufthansi From Germany, joined May 2002, 454 posts, RR: 2 Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1469 times:
Well I see the improvements but maybe this one would get a rejection due to format? If we cut the yellow line and a bit of the sky it returns to wallpaper format. Too much quadratic look isn't good for a.net. Anyway. Look at my thread "Do you like this one"... I reworked the pic too.