Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No Acceptions At A.net...  
User currently offlineLufthansi From Germany, joined May 2002, 454 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3118 times:

Hi folks. Just received some rejections. Looks like I'm collecting them, In know...

Please tell me your thoughts about it. Keep in mind the shots where taken from non public places and that I tried to get you guys something special.

Don't get me wrong you hard working screeners (or should I say rejectors?). You prevented me uploading some real stupid pics on my earlier days. But those aren't that bad...

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060424_img_gdfh.jpg
rejecting reasons:quality motiv

Is it too boring??? What is wrong with the quality? Too bright?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060424_IMG_2022.jpg
rejecting reasons:quality

Maybe you're right on this one

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060424_img_2020.jpg
rejecting reasons:quality motiv personal centered

Come on guys! The quality looks ok to me. Personal??? We have a lot of pics with waving pilots! And you cannot make out the face for to identify him! And in what is out of center on this pic???

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20060423_CRW_2166.JPG
rejecting reasons:soft

Sharpening looks bad on this one.


Life starts at take-off!
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1669 posts, RR: 62
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3092 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Lufthansi,
Doing things differently is not always good, it can be, but isn't on the top photo. The angle is uninteresting and the nosewheel off to the left is chopped in half. the image is either grossly undersharpened or slightly out of focus to my eye.
N0 2 the contrast and saturation is too high and the image is oversharpened a touch
No 3
The nose needed to be nearer the right side of the frame which would have also removed the distracting light object on the right edge. The motive is the Hanghai logo chopped in half. The personal means that the screener sent you a message, but you did not apparently scroll down to read it. Rejections for recognisable persons are people
N0 4 is a lovely image and I really like it. It is a bit soft and could also be rejected for distance or centreing, though I like it as it is. You do seem to have a distracting hot pixel, or perhaps a few, in the smoke that should be cloned out if resubmitting
Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineLufthansi From Germany, joined May 2002, 454 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3065 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 1):
You do seem to have a distracting hot pixel, or perhaps a few, in the smoke that should be cloned out if resubmitting

That is a landing plane there. Sure I can clone it but that's reality...


Thanks for your reply! I didn't thought that people will look at the nosewheel of the T7... Ok I'll keep that in mind next time! Shanghai is chopped. That's sad. You're right.



Life starts at take-off!
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1669 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3056 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Lufthansi (Reply 2):
That is a landing plane there. Sure I can clone it but that's reality...

I guess that is rather like the distant bird that looks like a dust spot, better to be removed than taken as such. I would be inclined to remove it as if I thought it was a hot pixel, others could easily do the same.
Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineAirportmanager From Ecuador, joined Mar 2001, 558 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2941 times:

Ive also noticed many good shots of mine being rejected, MANY here. And just when my acceptance rate was betteer. Its really many times, sad to get confiramtion emails because so many pics I want to share with the rest of the people, are rejected.A bit dis-ilusioning.  Sad I like a.net, but so many good ones down the drain. Maybe more screeners should come in? that way, all the photos in the qeue can be viewed in a more detailed way, and not rush through them. therefore the qeue moves on.

Stefano

No hard feelings


User currently offlineWillo From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 1352 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2882 times:

Quoting Airportmanager (Reply 4):
Maybe more screeners should come in? that way, all the photos in the qeue can be viewed in a more detailed way, and not rush through them. therefore the qeue moves on.

If the fault is there, the fault is there - it won't matter how many people screen the picture or how detailed a look is given, the result will be the same: rejection.

There's one thing that anet can't be accused of, and that is rushing through the queue  Wink


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2874 times:

Quoting Lufthansi (Thread starter):
rejecting reasons:quality motiv personal centered

Come on guys! The quality looks ok to me. Personal??? We have a lot of pics with waving pilots!

NOA_personal means tht the screener left a personal not on this rejection, this message appears at the end of the rejection mail.
Peter



-
User currently offlineLufthansi From Germany, joined May 2002, 454 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2742 times:

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 6):
NOA_personal means tht the screener left a personal not on this rejection, this message appears at the end of the rejection mail.
Peter

Oh sorry, I got that, I got that...



Life starts at take-off!
User currently offlineBrianW999 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 312 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2633 times:

I've taken the liberty of making a crop, selective sharpen and selective lightening of Lufthansi's 747 dustcloud shot.
I'd be interested in any comments from Lufthansi, or anyone else for that matter.

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/7904/dustcloud8ry.jpg


User currently offlineTS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2631 times:

Nice photo, but I've seen sharper ones. There's also too much dead space.

User currently offlineLufthansi From Germany, joined May 2002, 454 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2580 times:

Well I see the improvements but maybe this one would get a rejection due to format? If we cut the yellow line and a bit of the sky it returns to wallpaper format. Too much quadratic look isn't good for a.net. Anyway. Look at my thread "Do you like this one"... I reworked the pic too.


Life starts at take-off!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
My 300th Pic At A.net. posted Fri Aug 11 2006 12:10:11 by Warthog64
Commercial Sales At A.net? posted Thu Dec 23 2004 14:20:15 by Tommy Mogren
Who To Contact At A.net To Change Email Address? posted Sun May 16 2004 15:56:00 by Andyhunt
No Ladders At TUL posted Mon Apr 19 2004 03:33:07 by Law4fun
One More Swedish Photographer At A.net... posted Wed Jul 23 2003 18:06:53 by Ljungdahl
No Photography At LHR? posted Tue Feb 11 2003 11:15:36 by Bapilot2b
Reuters Buys At A.net Again posted Thu Nov 7 2002 15:03:14 by Fly-K
Digital SLR Images Now Standard At A.net? posted Thu May 2 2002 10:56:30 by AKE0404AR
Man U Logo Jet At MAN - No Priority posted Fri May 5 2006 16:54:58 by Clickhappy
Some Ripping Off At Myaviation.net posted Tue Apr 4 2006 16:24:19 by Gerardo