Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would This Be Bad Double  
User currently offlineCallMeCapt From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, RR: 7
Posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4310 times:

A couple of weeks ago I uploaded a photo I took of an F18. I'm pleased to say it got accepted. However, I have a photo of the same aircraft, same day, taken from the back quarter. I quite like the photo and would like to upload it but I don't know if it would be rejected for bad double.
Here is the photo in question.
http://users.tpg.com.au/CaptainG/F18GoranWilliamtown.jpg


Without struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass)
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3149 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4292 times:

And the accepted one?

If it's this one
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Goran Matovina

I would say it's no double, but I'm not sure about. Nice pics!

Georg


User currently offlineCallMeCapt From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4279 times:

Yes, thats the accepted one.
Might upload then.
Thanks
Goran



Without struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass)
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4279 times:

I don't think it will because recently, I uploaded two shots of an aircraft at an airshow and one got rejected for double. One was the aircraft and the other was the engine. So going off that, I'd say that yours will get the boot. But stranger things have happened...

User currently offlineCallMeCapt From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4273 times:

shame if it does get booted. I quite like the angle.
I just uploaded it. Doesnt hurt to leave it there. I can deal with a bad double rejection.
 Big grin



Without struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass)
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 4220 times:

A copy of the rejection rule:

DOUBLE
You already have photos of this aircraft in the Airliners.Net database that are the same as or very similar to these photo(s).

In order to receive this rejection, the other (similar) photos in the database must also have been taken by you, at the same day and at the same airport. Please do not upload multiple sequential shots of an aircraft during landing, taxiing or take-off, taken only a few seconds apart. Eventhough these photos may appear to be from different angles, we consider them similar. Please select the best shot from the sequence and upload only that one. One shot taken during landing, and another during take-off will generally NOT be considered a DOUBLE error.

In certain cases you can also get this rejection if there are photos in the database that are nearly identical to the one(s) rejected here, but taken on another date by you. Examples of this are photos of stored or preserved aircraft that have not moved since you took the other photos.

For window views we accept 2 shots per flight and side of aircraft when they show considerable different motives. So in other words the maximum number of accepted window views of the same registration on the same flight all taken by you would be 4.

For cabin views views we allow 2 shots per registration, date and photographer, when they show considerable different motives. The same applies for cockpit views.

Note: This situation will also occur if there are other photos very similar to these that are still in the upload queue and are waiting for the final screening.



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 4219 times:

The answer is in this sentence here:

Please do not upload multiple sequential shots of an aircraft during landing, taxiing or take-off, taken only a few seconds apart. Eventhough these photos may appear to be from different angles, we consider them similar.

Although if different movement:

One shot taken during landing, and another during take-off will generally NOT be considered a DOUBLE error.



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 4210 times:

Quoting Glennstewart (Reply 6):
One shot taken during landing, and another during take-off will generally NOT be considered a DOUBLE error.

To me, that is more of a double than say a picture of an aircraft at a show static, then a pic of it's cockpit or engine, but an aircraft landing, one pic coming at you, the other once passed is not.  Confused

Am I missing something?


User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5692 posts, RR: 44
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 4206 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Eadster (Reply 7):
but an aircraft landing, one pic coming at you, the other once passed is not.

Martin, I think Glenn is trying to point out that Goran's second shot would(should) be a double rejection.

Cheers

Chris



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 4203 times:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 7):
but an aircraft landing, one pic coming at you, the other once passed is not

I think you need to read the rejection text more carefully. You've misunderstood the text.



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineCallMeCapt From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 4192 times:

Ok, thanks for the clarification, Glenn
photo has been pulled.
I'm sure it will find a place in a frame on my wall unit.
 Wink



Without struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass)
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4162 times:

Quoting CallMeCapt (Reply 10):
Ok, thanks for the clarification, Glenn

No problems!!!

Would still be good to head up sometime to Williamstown  Smile
I'll consider this one answered.

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would This Be Considered Double? posted Fri May 18 2007 19:43:54 by Walter2222
Would These Be Bad Double? posted Tue Aug 9 2005 11:33:30 by Fergulmcc
Would This Be Considered A "bad" Double? posted Tue May 23 2006 05:22:02 by Je89_w
Would This Be Considered As A Double? posted Thu Aug 30 2007 16:04:05 by KLM772ER
Would This Be Double? posted Thu Aug 24 2006 00:45:34 by JumboJim747
Would This Be "bad Motive"? posted Fri May 19 2006 19:15:32 by AIRBUSRIDER
Would This Be Rejected For Motiv? posted Mon Jun 18 2007 06:01:54 by Jetmatt777
Would This Be Acceptable For Here? posted Sat Jun 16 2007 15:29:00 by Walter2222
Would This Be Acceptable? posted Sat May 19 2007 01:15:27 by Walter2222
Would These Be Considered A Double? posted Wed May 2 2007 15:42:20 by Acontador
Would These Be Bad Double? posted Tue Aug 9 2005 11:33:30 by Fergulmcc
Would This Be Considered A "bad" Double? posted Tue May 23 2006 05:22:02 by Je89_w
Would This Be A Double Rejection?(VX Cabin Shots) posted Wed Oct 31 2007 02:13:25 by Deaphen
Would This Be Double? posted Tue Oct 9 2007 05:23:02 by AirKas1
Would This Be Considered As A Double? posted Thu Aug 30 2007 16:04:05 by KLM772ER
Would This Be Double? posted Thu Aug 24 2006 00:45:34 by JumboJim747
Would This Be "bad Motive"? posted Fri May 19 2006 19:15:32 by AIRBUSRIDER
Would This Be Rejected For Motiv? posted Mon Jun 18 2007 06:01:54 by Jetmatt777
Would This Be Acceptable For Here? posted Sat Jun 16 2007 15:29:00 by Walter2222