Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Clutter?!? ;)  
User currently offlineLIPH From Italy, joined May 2004, 848 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1172 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Royal S King



Is it not clutter ?!?!?  Wink

Regards


Life sucks. Then you die. Live fast, die young.
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLinco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1380 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1158 times:

What gets me thinking is all that equipment, all that manufacturing time, all the testing, and most of all the price of a 773. I can never get my head round the cost of such things. When airlines advertise low fares I always think to myself, how do they actually make money? With all the other fees involved in running an airline.

Regards
Colin  Smile

P.S. Kudos to Royal, great insite to the building of the 773


User currently offlineZSOFN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1413 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1150 times:

It's a great shot  Smile

User currently offlineANITIX87 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 3307 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1087 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was under the impression that Boeing uses a moving assembly line. Which part of all of that moves!?

Either way, great picture.

TIS



www.stellaryear.com: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EOS 5DMkII, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 24-70 2.8L II, Canon 100mm 2.8L, Canon 100-4
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1055 times:

Quoting Linco22 (Reply 1):
When airlines advertise low fares I always think to myself, how do they actually make money? With all the other fees involved in running an airline.
One way they claim equipment back on tax.
They must be doing something right to stay in business.
Cheers
Edit to congratulate Royal on a stunning shot well done mate.

[Edited 2006-04-28 02:26:36]


On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1027 times:

Royal,

Fantastic shot! It's a pity we won't see many more shots like this. I think it's fantastic (and positive) exposure for Boeing  Smile

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1022 times:

So how did Royal get that picture? I've been on that tour - and cameras are prohibited. Does he have friends at Boeing? Or did he just use a cameraphone (damn Nikon guys)?  duck 

Drew



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 40
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1009 times:

I just saw the answer on another thread.


I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 996 times:

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 6):
Or did he just use a cameraphone

A little off topic, but the day will come when phone take very high quality shots. Imagine the can of worms that will open up?

Okay.... I'll put my hand up for being naughty.
I bent over in the Sistine Chapel in Rome, tied my shoelace whilst my 10D was facing towards the ceiling on timer. Got a neat shot, but I doubt the Pope would have been happy.

In the future, we'll be sneaking mobile phone cameras into all sorts of forbidden areas.

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1668 posts, RR: 61
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 989 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Glennstewart (Reply 8):
Okay.... I'll put my hand up for being naughty.

Glenn,
Do not bring your confessions to the Forum and expect absolution, you should go to a Confessional and have to do a penance my son.
(This is not meant to upset Catholics)
Temptation is a Sin but anyone who has been to the Sistine Chapel can understand your temptation. (I managed more than one photo every time I went)
Your penance........
Go away and press the accept button ten times on marginal shots (preferrably mine)

Quoting Glennstewart (Reply 8):
A little off topic, but the day will come when phone take very high quality shots. Imagine the can of worms that will open up?

Seriously though, what harm does it do, a few personal photos in an amazing place like the Sistine Chapel?
It is money talking again, reduced postcard sales etc and I bet if it was a for commercial purposes you could take them for a fee. Here, I am not being cynical about the Church, merely using Glenn's example. The situation with Royal's shot is more extreme in that it has been published, but my shots of the Sistine Chapel are only seen by friends and family. Nowhere will be safe from photos one day.

Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 1299 posts, RR: 27
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 970 times:

Hi there,

When I looked at this picture of the aircraft under construction, it reminded me of a picture that I took of an engine (F-16) in a test-bench (during a Base-visit). Would this be an acceptable "motive" for A.net?

http://walter2219.fotopic.net/p22519045.html

http://walter2219.fotopic.net/p22519043.html

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5697 posts, RR: 44
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 966 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I guess this is OT but Glenn & Mick started it...
When was photography banned in the Sistine Chapel? I was there in '89 and was OK but that was before the restoration was finished.
The camera I had then would sit perfectly flat on it's back so I have many W/angle shots of ceilings etc.. put timer on lay it on the floor and stand back.. trick was keeping others away but it is easy to convince them you are a crazy Australian and they had better keep their distance.

Back on topic.. Great shot Royal, glad you got to share it with us.

Chris



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 961 times:

Quoting LIPH (Thread starter):
Is it not clutter ?!?!?

No  Smile



-
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Strict Is Foreground Clutter? posted Sat Feb 24 2007 02:35:18 by Aussie18
Too Much Foreground Clutter? posted Mon Sep 18 2006 12:00:21 by Pavvyben
How Much Clutter Can I Have? posted Fri May 26 2006 12:21:35 by Aero145
Too Much Clutter Around This Bird? posted Fri May 5 2006 08:02:32 by 777MechSys
Clutter?!? ;) posted Thu Apr 27 2006 20:51:52 by LIPH
To Much Clutter? posted Sat Apr 1 2006 14:27:34 by EWS
Rejected Photo Due To Ramp Clutter posted Sun Oct 5 2003 00:06:30 by CanadaEH