Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rusty Editing Skills  
User currently offlineDahlgardo From Denmark, joined Sep 2004, 128 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1417 times:

Hi all

I'm beginning to find time for some uploading again, but with the ever increasing standards on a.net I would love some feedback on the shots I currently have queued. This is just to make sure I'm not wasting my time.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/hl7601-02102004-lax.jpg
Does the sticker on the side justify "hybrid" selection ?


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/cgaus1-06102004-mhv.jpg
Is quality OK ?


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/vhean1-09102004-vcv.jpg
Quality, motive ?

Thanks for any help.

/Jakob


Nothing to say
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKnighty From Australia, joined Dec 2004, 207 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1397 times:

Not sure about what category the first one falls into, the last 2 look a little heat hazed to me. Just out of interest, in the 3rd shot is the aircraft closest to camera VH-EAN?

Knighty



Ian Knight - Proud Canon shooter!
User currently offlineSinkrate From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 336 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1389 times:

Quoting Knighty (Reply 1):
is the aircraft closest to camera VH-EAN?

Knighty, it looks like it to me. Thats also what the file name says. smile 

Michael



Im not a photographer... But I did Stay at a Holiday Inn Express Last Night
User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

No. 1: Not sure about the category either, but I can't help feeling that the rear fuselage does not look as sharp as the front. I would try a little selective sharpening.

No. 2: Either heat distortion as Knighty says, or else (just possibly) artifacts introduced as a result of resizing in one step -- something that has happened to me in the past. I'm referring in particular to the apparent unevenness of the vertical stabiliser leading and trailing edges.

No. 3: I don't see any heat distortion on this one. I think the tape on the aircraft was simply applied unevenly. I would recrop to get the aircraft more vertically centred, but other than this I like the motive.

Charles



Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
User currently offlineDahlgardo From Denmark, joined Sep 2004, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1351 times:

Quoting Knighty (Reply 1):
Not sure about what category the first one falls into, the last 2 look a little heat hazed to me. Just out of interest, in the 3rd shot is the aircraft closest to camera VH-EAN?

It certainly is. VH-EAO is behind it.

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
No. 1: Not sure about the category either, but I can't help feeling that the rear fuselage does not look as sharp as the front. I would try a little selective sharpening.

The blurryness is possibly caused by the jet blast. I'll see if I can improve it.

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
No. 2: Either heat distortion as Knighty says, or else (just possibly) artifacts introduced as a result of resizing in one step -- something that has happened to me in the past. I'm referring in particular to the apparent unevenness of the vertical stabiliser leading and trailing edges

I thought re-sizing in one step was the best thing to do, to minimize loss of data ?

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
No. 3: I don't see any heat distortion on this one. I think the tape on the aircraft was simply applied unevenly. I would recrop to get the aircraft more vertically centred, but other than this I like the motive.

Thanks for your help

/Jakob



Nothing to say
User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1346 times:

Quoting Dahlgardo (Reply 4):
I thought re-sizing in one step was the best thing to do, to minimize loss of data ?

Exactly what I used to think, until I went from 3.2 to 8 megapixels and I started getting stepped diagonals. These days I resize in stages of around 400 pixels at a time.

Charles



Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5609 posts, RR: 45
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1316 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 5):
Exactly what I used to think, until I went from 3.2 to 8 megapixels and I started getting stepped diagonals. These days I resize in stages of around 400 pixels at a time.

What do you use to edit/resize you photos?
Using PSCS and before that PS7 I crop to a 3:2 or 4:3 aspect ratio image at orig resolution. If I have framed properly at shooting stage that will give me an image 2,200 to 3000px wide, then I do all the editing steps(leveled prior to crop if needed). I then resize to 1024 or 1200 wide in one step and save as Max jpg. I don't have the jaggie issue you speak of.

Cheers

Chris



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1283 times:

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 6):
What do you use to edit/resize you photos?

Chris,

I use Photoshop Elements 2.0. I follow pretty much the same workflow as you do, except that I sharpen after resizing as the very last step.

After I got my 350D I had a couple of photos rejected due to jaggies in areas where I had deliberately refrained from sharpening altogether. The effect was more one of steps rather than the normal sawtooth jaggies, a bit like the cheatline in this older photo (taken with a 4mp camera)

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Charles Polidano


but much more pronounced. Then I read that some people resized in stages, and now that I've started to do the same I haven't had the problem again. Maybe my version of Elements can't handle a lot of resizing at one go?

Charles



Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1244 times:

The shots of the 767's should be ok.

Korean is soft and I don't think the quality is there with that shot. If it could be improved and accepted - I would put into special category, but if that marking is on other aircaft, I'd place into Hybrid.

That's my take on things.


User currently offlineDahlgardo From Denmark, joined Sep 2004, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1198 times:

Quoting Eadster (Reply 8):
Korean is soft and I don't think the quality is there with that shot. If it could be improved and accepted - I would put into special category, but if that marking is on other aircaft, I'd place into Hybrid.

Thanks for your input. I'll pull the KE 747 from the queue and see if I can re-work it.

/Jakob



Nothing to say
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bad Editing? posted Thu Nov 30 2006 21:59:29 by 777MechSys
Rjxn For "Editing": Can Someone Please Explain? posted Thu Nov 23 2006 18:56:06 by D L X
Please Help With Re-editing posted Tue Nov 21 2006 06:55:49 by FlyingNanook
Help Editing A Picture. posted Tue Nov 21 2006 04:55:31 by Xaapb
Screen For Editing (apple Cinema Display) posted Sun Nov 19 2006 19:11:14 by DRAIGONAIR
What Monitor Do You Use For Editing? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 23:58:24 by Airplanenut
Editing Remarks On A Queued Image? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 00:10:35 by Ranger703
Motiv/size/editing Rejection posted Thu Nov 2 2006 15:38:14 by AirKas1
Quality Motiv Editing Soft Dark? posted Thu Oct 12 2006 17:11:33 by Mario340
Panning Shot Editing Help posted Sat Sep 16 2006 10:27:38 by Javibi