Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will These Make It?  
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3163 times:

Hi,

I've edited some photos taken in March.
Since I'm rather new, I would appreciate your help finding possible reject reasons.

Here are the shots:
1#
http://home.no.net/ssaero/anet/IMG_6672%20copy.jpg
2#
http://home.no.net/ssaero/anet/IMG_6775%20copy.jpg

Thanks!

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3157 times:

Both photo's seem to have some sort of 'pinkish' colour cast on them unless it's my eyes.

[Edited 2006-05-12 15:13:54]

User currently offlineLinco22 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1380 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3157 times:

Andersosl,

Both very nice images. On my works monitor they both look a little soft. Apart from that they are very nice images!

Regards
Colin  Smile


User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3152 times:

The first one is backlit - a pity.

The second one is soft.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3149 times:

Thanks !

I will try to fix the softness if it's possible.

BTW, what is your unsharp mask-settings?


User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3148 times:

Poor lighting on the first. Both are soft. Second is a nice shot I would do a re-edit on the second one.

User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 28
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3142 times:

Quoting Andersosl (Reply 4):
what is your unsharp mask-settings

It depends on the shot. There is no hard and fast rule.

A couple of suggestions:

Sharpen just the aircraft, not the whole image. Do a first sharpening at 0.2, 0, 500, then experiment with 0.3, 0, xxx.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineVIAF From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 196 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3100 times:

How to sharp just the aircraft ?

[Edited 2006-05-12 19:25:57]

User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3096 times:

Quoting VIAF (Reply 7):
How to sharp just the aircraft ?

Some Excellent Tutorials (by 9VSPO May 10 2006 in Aviation Photography)


User currently offlineVIAF From Brazil, joined Jan 2004, 196 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3092 times:

Thanks Ian !!


VIAF


User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3073 times:

Ok, I have sharpened the pic once more. Is it any better?
Is it oversharped?
http://home.no.net/ssaero/anet/koreanaircargo2.jpg


User currently offlineFuffla From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3021 times:

It looks better. However, it looks oversharpened, this is evident by the pixilated registration and winglets. I think everything else is fine. I am not sure how you would fix that though.

User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1300 posts, RR: 28
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3003 times:

Quoting Andersosl (Reply 10):
Is it any better?

Hi, I would also change the cropping if your original allows (I would put the aircraft slightly higher in the frame to give it a more balanced look: centering the fuselage would be too much because there is also the tail section to take into account).

It is a nice picture, but to me also the snow (although it is nature  Smile ) in the right lower corner distracts a bit from the subject, so if possible - if the original allows - I would try to see wheter a crop closer to the tail section would not give better focus on the subject... just my thought...

Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will These Make It? posted Fri May 12 2006 15:07:35 by Andersosl
I Practiced..will These Make It? posted Mon Jan 10 2005 18:02:56 by GRZ-AIR
New Scanner, Will These Make It? posted Thu Apr 18 2002 06:40:01 by C-GRYK
Will Any Of These Make It? posted Tue Oct 23 2001 10:09:48 by YKA
A Dc-3 And A Sunset, Will They Make It? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 01:28:13 by Flugnord
Would Any Of These Make It? posted Thu Sep 14 2006 19:09:16 by B78710
Could These Make It? posted Sat Aug 26 2006 05:38:43 by Alaska737
Will This Make It? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 22:58:44 by AirMalta
Will This Make It? posted Tue Jun 13 2006 03:41:05 by Jetmatt777
Yet Another "will This Make It" Thread posted Sat Jun 3 2006 23:40:22 by ATCme