And here are some items it may could cause this rejection.
* Photos that include window reflections (for shots taken through glass such as terminal windows).
-- Ok, some flash reflections on the display. Need for rejection?
* Photos showing just a part of an aircraft (with no motivation for doing so, like a special sticker, damage etc.).
-- Yes, it's part of an aircraft. The Cockpit :-/
* Photos with distracting or obstructing objects in the foreground (this is especially true for gate shots which are very difficult to get accepted due to their common nature and the large amount of equipment which usually surrounds the aircraft).
-- obstructing object in the foreground? The Yokes on the foreground maybe????
* Photos that do not show an aircraft or anything sufficiently related to aviation at all.
-- Yes, it is an aircraft
* Photos showing the date in the lower left or right corner of the image (some cameras do this, please diable this feature)
-- No date visible.
Can someone tell me why this belongs to a motiv rejection? Or was it just a wrong selection of rejection reason.
GlennStewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1783 times:
You can also try flash compensation. Drop it by -2/3 EV. If the screens aren't on and there is little light in the cockpit, hand held shots without flash are fairly difficult.
One of the best ideas is to estimate the conditions before you go into the cockpit (if you have limited time), and to take several shots with varied settings. This way you can make the call on all of your shots as to which one would come out better after post processing.
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
Karlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1746 times:
Quoting QANTAS077 (Reply 7): here is a tip, just use the bandaid tool in PS and the flash reflections will be non-existent. Wink if you can do it for dust then i can't see why you can't do it for flash reflection?
QANTAS077 From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5869 posts, RR: 39
Reply 12, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 1701 times:
question is, if it were a dust spot in the same location of the flash reflections it would be ok to clone them? i seriously don't know what the issue is with a few minor flash reflection clones from the LCD, it doesn't lessen the quality of the image in any way, just makes it a poofteenth more acceptable?
a true friend is someone who sees the pain in your eyes, while everyone else believes the smile on your face.