Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pre-screening Help  
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2645 times:

Hi.

Here are some shots, taken at Kjeller, 14th May:

http://home.no.net/ssaero/anet/IMG_7687%20copy.jpg

http://home.no.net/ssaero/anet/IMG_7465%20copy.jpg

Do they have a chance getting accepted?


Thanks

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2633 times:

Very nice, especially the Mustang.

The first one could use a bit of sharpening, I think.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2620 times:

Thanks, Viv!
BTW, should the Mustang-pic be categorized as a warbird?


User currently offlineAirplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2729 posts, RR: 42
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2613 times:

Nice photos, however I feel that the Mustang is too low in the frame?


Simon - London-Aviation.com
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2605 times:

Might be true, Airplanepics.

Is there any techniques to make a picture correct vertical centered?
I use Photoshop CS2 and 3:2-crop.

Thanks


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3884 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2595 times:

Quoting Andersosl (Reply 2):
should the Mustang-pic be categorized as a warbird?

Yes.

Quoting Airplanepics (Reply 3):
I feel that the Mustang is too low in the frame?

I agree, a bit higher in the frame and it would look even better.
If there's nothing left at the bottom of your photo, you could decrease space a bit at the top and sides.

Peter



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2583 times:

Quoting Andersosl (Reply 2):
should the Mustang-pic be categorized as a warbird?

If it has a civil registration, yes.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2554 times:

Quoting Andersosl (Thread starter):
Do they have a chance getting accepted?

Yes, but I feel both are slightly over-saturated.
The mustang needs to be higher. I think the F-16 is sharpened just enough.

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2547 times:

Thanks.
What about this one:

http://home.no.net/ssaero/anet/IMG_7299%20copy.jpg


User currently offlineWalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1292 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2522 times:

Quoting Andersosl (Reply 8):
What about this one:

Hi there,

Nice shot, but I think it's a bit low in the frame. It is was mine, I would crop it even tighter and cut some of the main rotor blades (they are just there to lift the "chopper", no added value to the picture  Smile ...) because that would give - according to me a much more dramatic effect...

Good luck with uploading,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2467 times:

The Mustang-pic was rejected for info and category.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...?filename=20060527_mustanganet.jpg

Categorized as "Warbird". I guess that is the reason for the category rejection?

I don't understand the info rejection.

Anyone?

Thanks.


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3884 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2455 times:

Please list all the information you uploaded?


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2443 times:

I used the auto complete form to find information about the aircraft. The reg. which was used : 414450.

Country/Location: Lillestrom - Kjeller (ENKJ) (typed manually).

Airline:: Scandanavian Historic Flight (typed by "Auto complete")
Aircraft: North American P-51D Mustang (typed by "Auto complete").

Date: 14th May 2006

Identification numbers: only the reg. number.

No remark, No watermark.

I don't remember which one i choosed: "Single engine prop" or "Airline or other".

The owner: Warbird

Paint Scheme: Normal (i guess)

Photo is picturing: Normal or Other.


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3884 posts, RR: 19
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2439 times:

It is a Warbird because it has a civil registration even if it is invisible.

That registration is N167F, and construction number is 122-40417.

The military registration number painted on it is probably not the original one and anyway, you don't need it for your upload.

So Reg: N167F, code: none, Cn: 122-40417.

It's a Single engine prop because it's a single engined propeller aircraft. You probably went wrong there. Again, it is a Warbird.



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineAndersosl From Norway, joined Feb 2006, 40 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2439 times:

Thank you very much !!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pre-Screening Help posted Fri Aug 4 2006 21:53:45 by Acontador
Been A While, Pre-screening Help Needed posted Sun Jul 16 2006 19:02:24 by MarkJBeckwith
Pre Screening Help posted Wed Jun 7 2006 22:29:17 by Andersosl
Pre-screening Help Request posted Mon May 29 2006 23:32:38 by Walter2222
Pre-screening Help posted Wed May 17 2006 13:21:29 by Andersosl
Pre-screening Help Please posted Sat Mar 11 2006 22:04:47 by Cosec59
I Need Some Pre-screening Help :-) posted Tue Nov 29 2005 12:19:52 by Avro85
Pre-screening Help! posted Tue Jul 19 2005 02:18:27 by YULtoPEI
Pre-screen Screening Help posted Thu Nov 23 2006 13:36:03 by Brett
Help On Motive Pre-screening posted Mon Oct 2 2006 18:16:53 by Lanas