Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question About Distance Rejection  
User currently offlineEdoca From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 688 posts, RR: 9
Posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4283 times:

I just had the following pic rejected and appeal-rejected for Distance.



I know, nothing special, and The Law applies - too much 'empty space'. My plea that the two aircraft on the ground add something (I would have the composition led to a somewhat different picture than the usual) obviously didn't help.

So, given that "This problem may be very easy to correct", does a.net really want me to upload this instead?


Ugly. I guess I'll just leave it. I'm not going to edit another shot from the sequence that shows this plane, a few seconds earlier, not showing the other ones - too many similar but better-quality shots there already... But I don't really understand the rule. Or am I wrong?

(PS - on neither of both screenings, I received any other rejection reasons. Quality may be nothing special, but I don't see any obvious defects neither).

[Edited 2006-05-19 13:26:12]

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 63
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4279 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think you could get away with leaving the 767 in. The 737 adds nothing to the shot imo.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 42
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4243 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Agree with Tim .
Edit the shot including the entire 767 but don't worry to much about the 737 as its chopped anyway and doesn't add a lot to the shot.
Cheers



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineEdoca From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 688 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4209 times:

Thanks gents, that's useful. Might give it another try soon!

User currently offlineMorvious From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 708 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4183 times:

Just as I thought to.. the B767 is nice on the background, and spoils the image when cropped half way down the middle!!


have a good day, Stefan van Hierden
User currently offlineDavidu From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 60 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4181 times:

"This problem may be very easy to correct", does a.net really want me to upload this instead? "

Yes. I would give this shot an HQ if I were to see it in the Q, and I'm sure other screeners would agree.

bregds
davidu


User currently offlineEdoca From Belgium, joined Mar 2005, 688 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4155 times:

Okay, so reworked from scratch, it would now look like this:

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/N674AN-MIA-holes-new.jpg

As I feared, I'm not entirely happy with the quality though... leave it, or drop it?


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4149 times:

I know this opinion is coming a little late in the game, but I think just the winglet and tip of the tail of the 737 is a little awkward there.

User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5814 posts, RR: 42
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4145 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Have to go with Eric on this one.. that winglet and tiny bit of tail.. just doesn't work for me, in some ways I think having a tiny bit of an A/C in a pic is as bad as cutting off a tiny bit.

If it was my photo, for my personal collection I might get out the clone tool... I know you can't do that here.

Cheers



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineUnattendedBag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2355 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4134 times:

I don't think the winglet or the tail add or distract from the picture one bit. However, the quality of the photo is not up to standards.


Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineMorvious From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 708 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4101 times:

Quoting UnattendedBag (Reply 9):
I don't think the winglet or the tail add or distract from the picture one bit.

I agree with this, I didn't even notice it in my first view.



have a good day, Stefan van Hierden
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question About A Badcenter Rejection posted Mon Dec 13 2004 02:43:26 by Asgeirs
Question About A Badmotiv Rejection posted Thu Jan 29 2004 15:53:10 by Clickhappy
Question About Bangkok Suvarnabhumi International posted Sun Nov 19 2006 15:34:39 by Airimages
A Question About PS Jpeg Options posted Tue Nov 7 2006 10:02:25 by Stil
Distance Rejection,Appeal? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 20:59:03 by Ranger703
A Question About Doubles And Motive posted Sun Oct 15 2006 14:49:31 by Psych
Question About Phuket posted Sun Oct 15 2006 09:56:03 by Airimages
Help With Distance Rejection posted Wed Oct 4 2006 00:27:20 by Ranger703
Flabbergasted About A Motiv Rejection! posted Mon Sep 25 2006 18:23:22 by Avro85
Question About Motiv. posted Wed Sep 13 2006 04:51:41 by COIAH756CA