Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lens Issues  
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Posted (6 years 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 840 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have a weird "halo" (sometimes 2) that shows up in every picture I take.

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 681 File size: 159kb
(Yeah my sensor needs cleaning)
This is one of my worst cases. Sunny days it isn't so obvious but still there. The lens in question is a Nikon 80 -200 F2.8. I bought the lens second hand from a guy at work who just bought a newer one with image stabilization. The lens originally had a Bower UV filter. I removed it when I noticed the halos. Didn't help at all. Filter on, filter off, hood on, hood off, 80mm, 200mm. Nothing really helps.

Anyone see this happen before? Anyone got any ideas to stop it?

Thanks,
Erick

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 57
Reply 1, posted (6 years 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 828 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I haven't seen this before and can't really help you out but just to make sure that it is you lens and not the camera have you tried a different lens on the camera or even your friends newer lens to see if it is still there. Just so that you eliminate either your camera or confirm that it is the lens. If it is the lens then I'd be asking for my money back from your friend.

Hope you get sorted

Fergul  sun 


Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1524 posts, RR: 67
Reply 2, posted (6 years 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 822 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

The fact that the marks appear to be part of a circle suggests some sort of flare within the combination of camera and lens. Lets face it, the lens you have bought is a damned good lens but I suspect that it has something wrong with it.
If it was in my hands now I would be looking at the lens mount, within the 'throat' of the camera and I suspect that some of the anti-reflective coating has been scratched/worn away from the metal. If your friend was using it on a film camera he would be far less likely to see the problem as digital cameras are more prone to it.
Nikon would re-coat the mount I guess
I would be very interested to know if I am right !

Mick Bajcar

User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 798 times:

Wow, that is interesting. I own the same lens so if you find out what it is let me know!

User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (6 years 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 763 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I will head to the camera repair shop tomorrow. I will let y'all know what I find out.

-Erick

User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 686 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

UPDATE: The shutter is damaged. Using the 80-200 lens magnifies the problem. They could see the cuts on the shutter blade. They were about to ship the camera to Nikon because they did not see the initial problem. After they called Nikon they knew what to look for and found the damage.

Before I bought the camera it was sent to Nikon for cleaning and firmware update. I am wondering if they might have accidentally damaged the shutter while cleaning. Nikon had a warranty on it but it expired before I bought the 80-200 and noticed the problem. Hell it could have been damaged long before I got the camera and no one ever noticed.

O'well that is life.

About two weeks before parts come in.  cry 

User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3053 posts, RR: 35
Reply 6, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 650 times:

Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 5):
Before I bought the camera it was sent to Nikon for cleaning and firmware update

It's really easy to do the firmware update oneself.


D700, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 80-400/4.5, Zeiss Ikon, 21/2.8, 28/2.8, 50/2, 90/2.5, Leica M9, Bronica ETSRi, 75/2.8
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 626 times:

Maybe they also calibrated the camera ? Does this happen on every shot with this lens?

Which 80-200 lens is it exeactly?

KS


How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 622 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 7):
Does this happen on every shot with this lens? Which 80-200 lens is it exeactly?

It is noticible with every shot only with Nikkor AF 80-200ED F/2.8. The arcs only showing up on that lens made me blame it.

Quoting Viv (Reply 6):
It's really easy to do the firmware update oneself.

I don't think you can do the firmware yourself on the D-100. I could be wrong. I only owned one for 4 months now. The previous owner sent it to Nikon for a check-up and firmware before selling it.

User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3053 posts, RR: 35
Reply 9, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 620 times:

Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 8):
I don't think you can do the firmware yourself on the D-100.

I did it on a D70.


D700, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 80-400/4.5, Zeiss Ikon, 21/2.8, 28/2.8, 50/2, 90/2.5, Leica M9, Bronica ETSRi, 75/2.8
User currently offlineCodeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 608 times:

Quoting 777MechSys (Reply 8):
It is noticible with every shot only with Nikkor AF 80-200ED F/2.8. The arcs only showing up on that lens made me blame it.

I've got this one:
http://www.europe-nikon.com/details....languageid=25&prodId=292&catId=121

I think it's the same as yours I hope. I didn't have any problems with it except for a slight BF.
Did you try doing test shots at different apertures and shutter speeds?

KS/codeshare


How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
User currently offline777MechSys From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 350 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (5 years 12 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 603 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Viv (Reply 9):
I did it on a D70.

I knew you could on the D70. Nikon says send in the D-100.

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 10):
I think it's the same as yours I hope

That is the lens.

Quoting Codeshare (Reply 10):
Did you try doing test shots at different apertures and shutter speeds?

Yep. The arcs never completely go away. Faster shutter speeds would help quite a bit. The above shot was F/8 at 1/250. (Could be wrong the original is at home)

Nikon is sending a new shutter assembly and all should be well in a couple of weeks.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Hyperzooms And Other Lens Issues. posted Fri May 4 2001 15:58:25 by Cfalk
Lens Compatibility Issues posted Tue May 13 2003 21:48:45 by Jderden777
Canon 90-300 Lens Not Sharp Anymore posted Sun Nov 19 2006 11:35:48 by Numloxx
New Lens Feedback posted Sun Nov 19 2006 08:40:07 by Aussie18
Rejects With New Lens posted Sun Nov 5 2006 18:43:13 by Manc
Thinking About A New Lens. posted Fri Oct 27 2006 07:52:50 by Avsfan
This From A Canon L Series Lens? posted Wed Oct 25 2006 16:56:34 by JakTrax
New Nikkor Lens posted Sun Oct 1 2006 19:34:15 by Domokun
Lens Flare posted Thu Sep 28 2006 18:02:17 by McG1967
Anybody Using A 180mm Prime Lens? posted Thu Sep 28 2006 01:07:23 by Lennymuir