TS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (7 years 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1912 times:
Hello guys,
I got a rather embarassing rejection yesterday with a whopping 5 reasons. http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...21_p1496_96-0006latch_sxf_17ma.jpg
By ticking quality, motiv, level, category, & dark the screener made it abundantly clear this photo doesn't really fit into the database. I understand I didn't invest enough time to post-process the photo (quality, dark, level) & that tail as category is wrong. My question for the screeners: Are such latch views always rejected or is there a chance of saving this one. I remember Willem (Aviopic) posted a similar view from PH-BUK, but I'm not sure what he was told.
Aviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 46 Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1879 times:
Haha Thomas first thing that came to my mind was "it must have been pretty bad then"
After seeing it I don't think it is that bad but of course it can be improved.
Personally I like the "different motive" whether it suits A.net is not up to me though.
I do remember the rejection I received from a similar shot but don't ask me what the rejection reasons were as I don't keep track of them.
Look at it from the positive side, you don't have to re-work and re-upload it just to get it rejected for another reason
At least I have the memory of how it was done in the database
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
I understand I didn't invest enough time to post-process the photo (quality, dark, level) & that tail as category is wrong. My question for the screeners: Are such latch views always rejected or is there a chance of saving this one. I remember Willem (Aviopic) posted a similar view from PH-BUK, but I'm not sure what he was told.
From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, 
From Spain, joined May 2004, 1058 posts, 
From India, joined May 2005, 450 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2045 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
