DLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted
Wed May 24 2006 06:17:15 UTC (8 years 4 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4684 times:
Soft/Blurry and lacks contrast. Sorry dude not this time. The angle looks good, I think if you could put something in the photo to somehow give it depth, give the aircraft something to be moving away from, it would come off really nicely.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted
Wed May 24 2006 06:19:00 UTC (8 years 4 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4683 times:
I'd say no as it's not centered, it's out of balance.
It's jagged on the right side, soft on the left side and tail.
I'm also seeing some grain on the areas that had shadow removal done.
Overall I'd say the angle just doesn't do it justice.
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted
Wed May 24 2006 06:20:09 UTC (8 years 4 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4683 times:
Maybe if you lowered it down to 1024 px wide and edited it correctly. But in this state, no.
Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
Eadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted
Wed May 24 2006 13:48:18 UTC (8 years 4 months 4 days ago) and read 4627 times:
Seems to have a slight hazy feel to it too.
Codeshare From Poland, joined Sep 2002, 1854 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted
Wed May 24 2006 15:14:48 UTC (8 years 4 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 4594 times:
Most likely you might get a quality rejection for that.
How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
VasanthD From India, joined May 2005, 450 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted
Wed May 24 2006 18:15:34 UTC (8 years 4 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4549 times:
Edging on a bad size too...
One Lucky shot deserves another!