Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1524 posts, RR: 67 Reply 2, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1485 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
A great shame as what would otherwise be a superb photograph is spoiled.............
by the window frame in the bottom left corner.
Inevitable motive rejection.
Mick Bajcar
Dendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1524 posts, RR: 67 Reply 8, posted (5 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1347 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW HEAD SCREENER
This time it is the incomplete engine intake and, I think the window has just made it into the extreme bottom left corner which shows as a very out of focus light corner.
Glennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 59 Reply 9, posted (5 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1318 times:
Hi Phil,
I was one of the many screeners that screened the second shot. To your credit the quality was enough that it was considered good enough on quality to be accepted. Unfortunately (and explanation in my words) with the engine and wing so far to the left side, and with no additional interest balancing the right side, it was considered motive.
My recommendation for window shots is to ensure that you capture shots at a time where you're including something of interest. We've all seen clouds and trees; we love it especially when we see airports and the like.
Bottom line is your shot was not a clear one to reject or accept.
Keep up the good work.
Glenn
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
WakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1279 posts, RR: 21 Reply 13, posted (5 years 11 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1225 times:
I noticed that as well. Congrats Mick, and best of luck on the screening team.
-Matt
JumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2402 posts, RR: 52 Reply 14, posted (5 years 11 months 1 week ago) and read 1184 times:
Great news well done Mick and all the best i hope this doesn't mean we wont see much old stuff anymore as you will be doing more screening then scanning.
Good luck with it.
Cheers
FiveMileFinal From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 232 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (5 years 11 months 2 days ago) and read 1109 times:
I was thinking the view outside the cockpit was blown (overexposed), not to mention the brown visor on the right kinda jacks things up a little (IMO, of course).
You goin'? We fly you dere! You been? We done already flew up in dere!
9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 20, posted (5 years 11 months 2 days ago) and read 1091 times:
Quoting EDDL (Reply 19): I hope this one is better then ...
I would say no. You could always darken the backlighting if the cockpit windows are too bright but the crop doesn't look right to me. Too much space on the left. Plus it's still grainy around the dark areas.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 55 Reply 21, posted (5 years 11 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1084 times:
Quoting EDDL (Reply 19): I hope this one is better then ...
Phil, what is causing that ugly green color cast? It is clearly visible on the pilot's seat back, but not the other.
To overcome the blown out view out the windscreen, you need to bring in light in an amount greater then the outside, then expose to that value or 1/3 to 1/2 stop above to make the inside lighter then the outside.
EDDL From Germany, joined Dec 2002, 737 posts, RR: 22 Reply 22, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1007 times:
Quoting JeffM (Reply 21): Phil, what is causing that ugly green color cast? It is clearly visible on the pilot's seat back, but not the other.
I have no idea. I think it's some kind of reflection coming from something green behind the captain's seat. It's visible on all pictures, so it can't be a camera/lens problem. Thanks for the heads-up though.
Quoting 9VSPO (Reply 20): I would say no. You could always darken the backlighting if the cockpit windows are too bright but the crop doesn't look right to me. Too much space on the left. Plus it's still grainy around the dark areas.
You are right, but it seems to be good enough for A.net ...