Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are Registrations Required Now?  
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11499 posts, RR: 52
Posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2090 times:

I just got a rejection for missing information. I uploaded the shot without a registration, because I do not know it. Are these shots no longer acceptable without a registration?

Thanks again


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2085 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

You do need to fill in the correct format (e.g. PH-***) even if you don't know the reg

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11499 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2080 times:

Thanks!

(Can I do that retroactively?)

EDIT: by the way, is there any chance that the add photo page can be reprogrammed to not allow you to submit without doing that, or by automatically putting N***AA or whatever in there? Seems like a funky reason to reject.

[Edited 2006-06-14 21:13:21]


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineTimdeGroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2073 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting D L X (Reply 2):
(Can I do that retroactively?)

What do you mean?

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11499 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2073 times:

I was joking. I meant, can you accept it and update the record to say N***AA.


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2073 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 2):
retroactively?



Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 3):
What do you mean?

It's a new word just introduced into the English Language. It means retrospectively. Big grin


User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1991 times:

But seriously....


The strength of Airliners.net isn't just the photos, but the database containing a wealth of information.

Without registrations, the photos have far less meaning.



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlineVaporlock From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1990 times:

Quoting Glennstewart (Reply 6):
The strength of Airliners.net isn't just the photos, but the database containing a wealth of information.

Without registrations, the photos have far less meaning.

Glenn, well said! The pictures are always great due to the high standards of a.net, but the information about the picture is just as important.

Phyllis  bouncy 


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11499 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1979 times:

Quoting Glennstewart (Reply 6):
Without registrations, the photos have far less meaning.

If they are a boring, side-on shot, sure.

If it's say... the first ATA 757-300 passing through the Capitol at National Airport, I don't think the registration is nearly as important as the motive.

In any event, I always try to grab the regs if I can.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 54
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1974 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 8):
If they are a boring, side-on shot, sure.

No, generally speaking registrations should be sort on all occasions.

Quoting D L X (Reply 8):
In any event, I always try to grab the regs if I can.

Glad to hear it  Smile



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Screeners Are In Action Now posted Sat Jun 14 2003 18:29:27 by Boieng747-400
Are The Prices Of DSLR's Really This Low Now? posted Mon Jul 12 2004 16:21:36 by F9Widebody
Final Word On How Uploads Are Done Now posted Thu Feb 7 2002 22:05:19 by Joe pries
1024x768 Is NOA Size Now? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 13:04:02 by Fiveholer
French Military Registrations posted Mon Oct 30 2006 23:15:29 by Ptrjong
Who Are The New Talents And Underrated Shooters? posted Thu Oct 19 2006 22:18:17 by BigPhilNYC
Some Assistance Required posted Wed Oct 11 2006 14:04:53 by DarrenBe
Are Flags Copyrighted Also? posted Tue Sep 26 2006 19:38:43 by PUnmuth@VIE
Are These Shots Acceptable? posted Sun Sep 24 2006 23:17:11 by Ranger703
30D Soon... Buy Swabs Now? posted Sat Sep 16 2006 00:43:52 by WhyWhyZed