Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Individual Flightdeck Item Not Acceptable?  
User currently offlinePaparadzi From Malaysia, joined Jan 2005, 201 posts, RR: 4
Posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

I have this picture of the CDSS monitor rejected for motiv.


MyAviation.net photo:
Click here for bigger photo!
Photo © M Radzi Desa



Just wonder, why is it not acceptable? How about pictures of landing gears and individual engines? Those seems to be acceptable here.

If I am to post picture of the wheel well bay, will it be acceptable?

[Edited 2006-06-28 07:42:44]


Rules are made for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEadster From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 2216 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1171 times:

I don't want to sound mean or arrogant here but for all I or others know, that monitor could be on a boat.

Engines, landing gears yes as they are easily identified.

Just my thoughts


User currently offlineGlennstewart From Australia, joined Jun 2003, 1124 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1166 times:

Quoting Paparadzi (Thread starter):
Just wonder, why is it not acceptable?

These are certainly considered to be motiv. Furthermore, this one could be borderline people given the person on the monitor.

Wheels and engines are typically borderline. They taken on the merit, context and quality of the shot, but the acceptance rate is very low.

The engines and gear accepted are typically where there is action or something unusual. In addition, the acceptance shows that we consider the motive to be valid for that particular shot.

Context and therefore motive of the above shot is suspect. Sure.. it's aviation, but it is somewhat of a random portion of the plane. It is clearly rejectable for motive.

Glenn



Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4162 posts, RR: 54
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1158 times:

Quoting Glennstewart (Reply 2):
Furthermore, this one could be borderline people given the person on the monitor.



Quote:

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/reasons.php#People
Your photo(s) showed people in a way so that they can be recognised.

We do not accept photos with people on them whose faces are clearly visible, either from the front or from the side. This even applies to photos of people whom you may know personally and who have given you permission to upload the photo. The only exceptions to this rule are people of common interest, like for example Sir Richard Branson or Michael O'Leary, or if pilots are visible in general aviation aircraft



-
User currently offlineAirplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2729 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1145 times:

And you'd know all about that Peter.  sarcastic 

One word, Apache?



Simon - London-Aviation.com
User currently offlineViv From Ireland, joined May 2005, 3142 posts, RR: 29
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

The shot does not suggest "Aviation" to me.

But then I'm prejudiced - I don't find cabin shots interesting either.



Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Acceptable Or Not Acceptable? posted Wed Mar 23 2005 23:22:53 by Aviopic
Acceptable Motive?... Or Not? posted Tue Jul 18 2006 23:04:39 by Walter2222
Backlit, Acceptable Or Not? posted Fri Dec 30 2005 21:28:09 by Edoca
Citation 750 Photo Acceptable? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 09:51:30 by GertLOWG
Acceptable Motive? posted Thu Nov 23 2006 22:53:13 by Ranger703
Canon 90-300 Lens Not Sharp Anymore posted Sun Nov 19 2006 11:35:48 by Numloxx
Would This Photo Be Acceptable - 'motive'? posted Tue Nov 14 2006 01:41:04 by Chukcha
Acceptable Photo posted Sat Nov 11 2006 21:50:17 by CYEGsTankers
This Tail-shot - Still Acceptable Motive? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 14:36:47 by Walter2222
Acceptable? posted Sun Nov 5 2006 00:19:20 by FighterPilot